Oldest original C-card around

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:

:intersected in them. However it has to be the original card, not a
:replacement

What makes you think it isn't?

Dan Bracuk
Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47cb54fe$0$23613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>I just relaminated a c-card replaced in 1990 ( after losing the original ).
>Do people still have their original c-cards and does anyone like me use a
>very old one to dive with when ID is necessary ( quite a few " is this card
>for real looks " from the young'uns)?
>

Mine is original unlaminated with a bit of the bottom missing (breaking up)

It is dated 1/80 and is numbered A0541 of the National Qualification System.

I used it yesterday, though I leave it inside the plastic sleeve of the NGQ
passbook thing that holds my log and qualification register.

Now that you have mentioned laminating, I think I'll get mine done tomorrow
(we have a laminator in the office)

Hoges in WA

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47cb54fe$0$23613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>I just relaminated a c-card replaced in 1990 ( after losing the original ).
>Do people still have their original c-cards and does anyone like me use a
>very old one to dive with when ID is necessary ( quite a few " is this card
>for real looks " from the young'uns)?
>

Mine is original unlaminated with a bit of the bottom missing (breaking up)

It is dated 1/80 and is numbered A0541 of the National Qualification System.

I used it yesterday, though I leave it inside the plastic sleeve of the NGQ
passbook thing that holds my log and qualification register.

Now that you have mentioned laminating, I think I'll get mine done tomorrow
(we have a laminator in the office)

Hoges in WA

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47cb54fe$0$23613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>I just relaminated a c-card replaced in 1990 ( after losing the original ).
>Do people still have their original c-cards and does anyone like me use a
>very old one to dive with when ID is necessary ( quite a few " is this card
>for real looks " from the young'uns)?
>

Mine is original unlaminated with a bit of the bottom missing (breaking up)

It is dated 1/80 and is numbered A0541 of the National Qualification System.

I used it yesterday, though I leave it inside the plastic sleeve of the NGQ
passbook thing that holds my log and qualification register.

Now that you have mentioned laminating, I think I'll get mine done tomorrow
(we have a laminator in the office)

Hoges in WA

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:47cb54fe$0$23613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>I just relaminated a c-card replaced in 1990 ( after losing the original ).
>Do people still have their original c-cards and does anyone like me use a
>very old one to dive with when ID is necessary ( quite a few " is this card
>for real looks " from the young'uns)?
>

Mine is original unlaminated with a bit of the bottom missing (breaking up)

It is dated 1/80 and is numbered A0541 of the National Qualification System.

I used it yesterday, though I leave it inside the plastic sleeve of the NGQ
passbook thing that holds my log and qualification register.

Now that you have mentioned laminating, I think I'll get mine done tomorrow
(we have a laminator in the office)

Hoges in WA

"Dan Bracuk" <bracuk@pathcom.com> wrote in message
news:thtms3dtqpm0i494unbqaoomejf33ajr4f@4ax.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
>
> :intersected in them. However it has to be the original card, not a
> :replacement
>
> What makes you think it isn't?

sorry think I misread your post the 1st time for some reason

"Dan Bracuk" <bracuk@pathcom.com> wrote in message
news:thtms3dtqpm0i494unbqaoomejf33ajr4f@4ax.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
>
> :intersected in them. However it has to be the original card, not a
> :replacement
>
> What makes you think it isn't?

sorry think I misread your post the 1st time for some reason

"Dan Bracuk" <bracuk@pathcom.com> wrote in message
news:thtms3dtqpm0i494unbqaoomejf33ajr4f@4ax.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
>
> :intersected in them. However it has to be the original card, not a
> :replacement
>
> What makes you think it isn't?

sorry think I misread your post the 1st time for some reason

"Dan Bracuk" <bracuk@pathcom.com> wrote in message
news:thtms3dtqpm0i494unbqaoomejf33ajr4f@4ax.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
>
> :intersected in them. However it has to be the original card, not a
> :replacement
>
> What makes you think it isn't?

sorry think I misread your post the 1st time for some reason

"Hoges in WA" <tzhoganzz2@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:xDKyj.21661$421.15923@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:47cb54fe$0$23613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>I just relaminated a c-card replaced in 1990 ( after losing the
>>original ). Do people still have their original c-cards and does anyone
>>like me use a very old one to dive with when ID is necessary ( quite a few
>>" is this card for real looks " from the young'uns)?
>>
>
> Mine is original unlaminated with a bit of the bottom missing (breaking
> up)
>
> It is dated 1/80 and is numbered A0541 of the National Qualification
> System.
>
> I used it yesterday, though I leave it inside the plastic sleeve of the
> NGQ passbook thing that holds my log and qualification register.
>
> Now that you have mentioned laminating, I think I'll get mine done
> tomorrow (we have a laminator in the office)
>
> Hoges in WA

NGQ?