Hillary's Heroic Trip to Bosnia

"Joe English" <joe2aenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
news:47ed2141$0$25209$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster. com...

> Contrary to popular media lies, the current Iraqi conflict was based on
> Sadaam Hussein's direct violation of the terms the first Iraqi conflict
> was stopped. The United Nations gave Sadaam plenty of chances to live
> up to his agreement - he disobeyed nearly everyone.
>
> There is no dispute about WMD's. In case you were unaware he used them
> - he used them on the Iranis.
>
> If he had no more after the first Gulf War is still a matter of
> discussion but not what the war was about. Sadaam nay not have had
> them, someday we may find some in one of his neighboring countries or
> buried in the desert. If he never had them why not let the inspections
> be done as he agreed. Looks to me like he was hiding something.
>
> But again no matter how many time you repeat that the Iraqi War was over
> WMDs it doesn't change the fact that it was over the violations of the
> term of surrender from the first Iraqi Conflict

Don't worry Joe, Cathcart is just doing the usual cheap-shot drive by.

It's what defines him.

On 28 Mar, 17:38, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On 28 Mar, 12:37, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>> On 27 Mar, 22:26, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On 27 Mar, 04:21, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:6cf610e5-b8ae-4e60-b8f8-73c327e91a5e@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>> On Mar 26, 10:07 pm, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "nitespark" <nitesp...@cox.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> Well, since most of you guys voted for Bush..
> >>>>>>> - Twice
> >>>>>> Love it.
> >>>>>> More leftist bigotry and projection.
> >>>>>>> I'll sit back, see what your general consensus is on who to vote for then
> >>>>>> vote for The Other Candidate.
> >>>>>> Cool. Then we can count on you to *not* vote for HillBillary.
> >>>>>>> ( - & Don't Blame me, I voted for Al Gore )
> >>>>>>> Harvey . .
> >>>>>> Just so you know, I didn't vote for Dubya the first time, and had to the
> >>>>>> second time because you rocket surgeons proposed Lurch and The Breck Girl.
> >>>>> Scotty, you didn't vote for Dubya? Do you know that makes you real
> >>>>> liberal, leftist scum?
> >>>>> Janusz
> >>>> not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran
> >>>> against Al Gore. It means nothing else
> >>> I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal
> >>> and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had
> >>> been different candidate. That's make him real, dedicated liberal or
> >>> like he prefer real leftist scum.
> >>> Janusz
> >> it means squat, I not shocked at all seems that Scot picked a candidate
> >> by what the candidate stood for instead of what the party affiliation
> >> stood for.
> > Joe, can you read with comprehension? He clearly stated that he is
> > declared Democrat. He voted for Democrat candidate and would have done
> > the same next time. It was his choice to become leftist scum.
>
> >> Too bad more don't blindly lead the party's declarations
>
> > as you do?
>
> > Janusz
>
> Yes I read very well with comprehension.
You must be kidding.

> Because Scott voted for a
> particular candidate doesn't make him a leftist scum.
Of course not. It's his clear preference for liberals.
"and had to the second time because you rocket surgeons proposed...."
It's clear for anyone with even elementary reading skills - Scotty
wanted to vote for a democrat.

> It is with deep
> pity that I feel for you not to be able to understand simple concepts.
Joe, read the whole text couple more times, but very, very slowly and
maybe you'll catch up. (frankly speaking I doubt if it is possible).

>
> Sometimes with our political parties and the selection of candidates you
> have to pick a candidate that is the lesser of two evils.
>
> It must be hell being you

Oh Yes, I'm hell of a man.

Janusz

On 28 Mar, 17:40, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On 28 Mar, 12:39, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> >> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>> On 27 Mar, 22:25, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> >>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On 26 Mar, 22:19, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html
> >>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>> It is useless for sheep to pass resolutions in favor of
> >>>>>> vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion.
> >>>>>> WILLIAM RALPH INGE, D. D. 1860-1954
> >>>>> Small lie story. Even Douggy can invent something better. BTW on the
> >>>>> web page you missed really interesting story about new self defense
> >>>>> invention. There is big field for improvements. You can work out how
> >>>>> to carry it concealed.
> >>>>>http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=68244
> >>>>> Janusz
> >>>> she blames it on sleep deprivation - even though she repeated the lies
> >>>> several times
> >>>> who would figure she would lie
> >>>> maybe if she would have wagged her finger they would have believed her
> >>> I don't care about her petty lies. It's nothing in comparison with
> >>> some politicians who created some real lies, which cost many human
> >>> lives.
> >>> Janusz
> >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here
> >> Bosnia trip is not petty.
>
> > To make your task easier. Answer the question
> > How many have died due to that lie?
>
> what lie that she was under attack in Bosnia, that is the lie she wasn't
>
>
>
> >> But then most here don't care what you think
>
> > Did you mean that most of Metoos don't care? Are you the club
> > speaker?
>
> I'm not aware of any metoo club. I am not the speaker for any club

What is it? Denial or Alzheimer?

Janusz

On 28 Mar, 17:47, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
> George Cathcart wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 7:39 am, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>
> >> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here
> >> Bosnia trip is not petty. But then most here don't care what you think
>
> > A lot more petty than the lies about WMDs in Iraq that have costs
> > thousands of lives. A lot more petty than "Mission Accomplished" and
> > "Major combat is over." But then most here know that you don't think.
>
> > gc
>
> Contrary to popular media lies, the current Iraqi conflict was based on
> Sadaam Hussein's direct violation of the terms the first Iraqi conflict
> was stopped. The United Nations gave Sadaam plenty of chances to live
> up to his agreement - he disobeyed nearly everyone.
OMG Joe, it's even worse than I thought. You need something to read.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War

>
> There is no dispute about WMD's. In case you were unaware he used them
> - he used them on the Iranis.
Iranis? Joe, inhabitants of Iran are called Iranians or Persians.
BTW chemical weapons were used against Iran with full blessing and
guidance
of you peace loving country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Ir...emical_weapons
"the CIA began in 1984 secretly to give Iraq intelligence that Iraq
used to "calibrate" its mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. In
August, the CIA establishes a direct Washington-Baghdad intelligence
link, and for 18 months, starting in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq
with "data from sensitive U.S. satellite reconnaissance
photography...to assist Iraqi bombing raids." The Post's source said
that this data was essential to Iraq's war effort."

>
> If he had no more after the first Gulf War is still a matter of
> discussion but not what the war was about. Sadaam nay not have had
> them, someday we may find some in one of his neighboring countries or
> buried in the desert. If he never had them why not let the inspections
> be done as he agreed. Looks to me like he was hiding something.
Are you WMD or intel expert? I don't think so. Definitely you're the
dream of politicians - citizen who buys any BS delivered to him by
propaganda.

>
> But again no matter how many time you repeat that the Iraqi War was over
> WMDs
And I in my naivety all the time thought that it was Bush, Powell,
Rumsfeld and couple of others, who used to repeat this lie.

>it doesn't change the fact that it was over the violations of the
> term of surrender from the first Iraqi Conflict

No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL.

Janusz

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:31:45 -0700, janusz_w@hotmail.com wrote:

> No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL.

Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days...

--
See NNTP header field "X-Real-Email-Address" to reply by email.

On Mar 28, 3:26*pm, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net>
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:31:45 -0700, janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL.
>
> Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days...

We were supposed to win the war first. Instead, under the new
calculations according to your candidate, gas prices are now expected
to decrease in approximately 100 years.

janusz_w@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 28 Mar, 17:38, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On 28 Mar, 12:37, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Mar, 22:26, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>>>>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On 27 Mar, 04:21, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> <Harveyat8c4...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:6cf610e5-b8ae-4e60-b8f8-73c327e91a5e@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 26, 10:07 pm, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "nitespark" <nitesp...@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> Well, since most of you guys voted for Bush..
>>>>>>>>> - Twice
>>>>>>>> Love it.
>>>>>>>> More leftist bigotry and projection.
>>>>>>>>> I'll sit back, see what your general consensus is on who to vote for then
>>>>>>>> vote for The Other Candidate.
>>>>>>>> Cool. Then we can count on you to *not* vote for HillBillary.
>>>>>>>>> ( - & Don't Blame me, I voted for Al Gore )
>>>>>>>>> Harvey . .
>>>>>>>> Just so you know, I didn't vote for Dubya the first time, and had to the
>>>>>>>> second time because you rocket surgeons proposed Lurch and The Breck Girl.
>>>>>>> Scotty, you didn't vote for Dubya? Do you know that makes you real
>>>>>>> liberal, leftist scum?
>>>>>>> Janusz
>>>>>> not it doesn't it only means he didn't vote George Bush when he ran
>>>>>> against Al Gore. It means nothing else
>>>>> I know you're shocked, but let's face the truth. He voted for liberal
>>>>> and he would have done the same in the next elections if there had
>>>>> been different candidate. That's make him real, dedicated liberal or
>>>>> like he prefer real leftist scum.
>>>>> Janusz
>>>> it means squat, I not shocked at all seems that Scot picked a candidate
>>>> by what the candidate stood for instead of what the party affiliation
>>>> stood for.
>>> Joe, can you read with comprehension? He clearly stated that he is
>>> declared Democrat. He voted for Democrat candidate and would have done
>>> the same next time. It was his choice to become leftist scum.
>>>> Too bad more don't blindly lead the party's declarations
>>> as you do?
>>> Janusz
>> Yes I read very well with comprehension.
> You must be kidding.
>
>> Because Scott voted for a
>> particular candidate doesn't make him a leftist scum.
> Of course not. It's his clear preference for liberals.
> "and had to the second time because you rocket surgeons proposed...."
> It's clear for anyone with even elementary reading skills - Scotty
> wanted to vote for a democrat.
>
>> It is with deep
>> pity that I feel for you not to be able to understand simple concepts.
> Joe, read the whole text couple more times, but very, very slowly and
> maybe you'll catch up. (frankly speaking I doubt if it is possible).
>
>> Sometimes with our political parties and the selection of candidates you
>> have to pick a candidate that is the lesser of two evils.
>>
>> It must be hell being you
>
> Oh Yes, I'm hell of a man.
>
> Janusz

if I was a man as you define I'd castrate myself with a very dull knife

janusz_w@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 28 Mar, 17:40, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On 28 Mar, 12:39, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On 27 Mar, 22:25, Joe English <joe2aengl...@wisperhome.com> wrote:
>>>>>> janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On 26 Mar, 22:19, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> http://www.breitbart.tv/html/68124.html
>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>> It is useless for sheep to pass resolutions in favor of
>>>>>>>> vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion.
>>>>>>>> WILLIAM RALPH INGE, D. D. 1860-1954
>>>>>>> Small lie story. Even Douggy can invent something better. BTW on the
>>>>>>> web page you missed really interesting story about new self defense
>>>>>>> invention. There is big field for improvements. You can work out how
>>>>>>> to carry it concealed.
>>>>>>> http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=68244
>>>>>>> Janusz
>>>>>> she blames it on sleep deprivation - even though she repeated the lies
>>>>>> several times
>>>>>> who would figure she would lie
>>>>>> maybe if she would have wagged her finger they would have believed her
>>>>> I don't care about her petty lies. It's nothing in comparison with
>>>>> some politicians who created some real lies, which cost many human
>>>>> lives.
>>>>> Janusz
>>>> typical - lies are lies - and liars or liars. Hillary's lies about here
>>>> Bosnia trip is not petty.
>>> To make your task easier. Answer the question
>>> How many have died due to that lie?
>> what lie that she was under attack in Bosnia, that is the lie she wasn't
>>
>>
>>
>>>> But then most here don't care what you think
>>> Did you mean that most of Metoos don't care? Are you the club
>>> speaker?
>> I'm not aware of any metoo club. I am not the speaker for any club
>
> What is it? Denial or Alzheimer?
>
> Janusz

You are slower than I thought

It really does suck to be you

There will be no more replies from me

I would at least like a challenge - you are not worth the bandwidth

"Joe English" <joe2aenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
news:47ed7e2f$0$14548$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster. com...

> You are slower than I thought
>
> It really does suck to be you
>
> There will be no more replies from me
>
> I would at least like a challenge - you are not worth the bandwidth

Thanks to whatever deity you worship, or better yet, thank you for being
American.

On 28 Mar, 23:26, Grumman-581 <grumman581-usenet-2...@spambob.net>
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:31:45 -0700, janus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > No, my poor naive, uneducated friend - it was about OIL.
>
> Agreed... That's why gas is so cheap these days...
>
gas or US dollar?

Janusz