New pipeline proposal for Port Everglades

I received the following message regarding a natural gas off loading
pipeline proposed for Port Everglades. From the look of it, it will run
across the reef and then be suspended underwater some 8 to 10 miles off
shore. The proposal indicates it will be roughly 100 feet below the surface
except when in use. There is a public hearing on this as shown in the
following information. I will not be able to attend the meeting due to a
conflict with a meeting for the Winterfest Boat Parade. The message came
with the proposal attached. If you'd like a copy, just ask, but be sure to
ask from a legitimate e-mail address.

Lee
_______________________________________________
Hello SEFCRI stakeholders,

The US Coast Guard and the Maritime Administration are holding a public
meeting to receive comments prior to preparing an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the CALYPSO liquid natural gas pipeline (LNG) , LLC,
(Calypso) license application (see attached file). The meeting will be held
on December 6th, 2006 6.30pm at the Ft Lauderdale Marriott. You may also
provide written comments until December 21st.

Thanks

Nikki

=======================================
Nikki Poulos
Coral Reef Conservation Program Coordinator/MICCI Program Coordinator
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Biscayne Bay Environmental Center
1277 NE 79th Street Causeway
Miami, FL 33138
Phone: 305-795-2111
Fax: 305-795-3470
Email: Nikki.Poulos@dep.state.fl.us
Websites: www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/programs/coral/
and www.southeastfloridareefs.net (under construction)

=======================================

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 17:08:05 -0500, "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

>I received the following message regarding a natural gas off loading
>pipeline proposed for Port Everglades. From the look of it, it will run
>across the reef and then be suspended underwater some 8 to 10 miles off
>shore. The proposal indicates it will be roughly 100 feet below the surface
>except when in use. There is a public hearing on this as shown in the
>following information. I will not be able to attend the meeting due to a
>conflict with a meeting for the Winterfest Boat Parade. The message came
>with the proposal attached. If you'd like a copy, just ask, but be sure to
>ask from a legitimate e-mail address.
>
>Lee
>_______________________________________________
>Hello SEFCRI stakeholders,
>
>The US Coast Guard and the Maritime Administration are holding a public
>meeting to receive comments prior to preparing an Environmental Impact
>Statement (EIS) for the CALYPSO liquid natural gas pipeline (LNG) , LLC,
>(Calypso) license application (see attached file). The meeting will be held
>on December 6th, 2006 6.30pm at the Ft Lauderdale Marriott. You may also
>provide written comments until December 21st.
>
>Thanks
>
>Nikki
>
> =======================================
> Nikki Poulos
> Coral Reef Conservation Program Coordinator/MICCI Program Coordinator
> Florida Department of Environmental Protection
> Biscayne Bay Environmental Center
> 1277 NE 79th Street Causeway
> Miami, FL 33138
> Phone: 305-795-2111
> Fax: 305-795-3470
> Email: Nikki.Poulos@dep.state.fl.us
> Websites: www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/programs/coral/
> and www.southeastfloridareefs.net (under construction)
>
> =======================================
>
>
>
How come these pipelines are never run off the Kennedy compound in
Mass or the Bush compound in Maine ?

"Rod" <log_dog@verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:4570d116.2703406@news.verizon.net...
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 17:08:05 -0500, "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>>I received the following message regarding a natural gas off loading
>>pipeline proposed for Port Everglades. From the look of it, it will run
>>across the reef and then be suspended underwater some 8 to 10 miles off
>>shore. The proposal indicates it will be roughly 100 feet below the
>>surface
>>except when in use. There is a public hearing on this as shown in the
>>following information. I will not be able to attend the meeting due to a
>>conflict with a meeting for the Winterfest Boat Parade. The message came
>>with the proposal attached. If you'd like a copy, just ask, but be sure
>>to
>>ask from a legitimate e-mail address.
>>
>>Lee
>>______________________________________________ _
SNIP

>>
> How come these pipelines are never run off the Kennedy compound in
> Mass or the Bush compound in Maine ?

They tried to put Wind mills near the Kennedy compound in Mass. Didn't
happen

On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:43:58 GMT, "Gary Owens" <gowens1@cfl.rr.com>
wrote:
> They tried to put Wind mills near the Kennedy compound in Mass. Didn't
> happen

Only because they figured out that all the hot air coming from the
Kennedy compound would interfere with the normal prevailing winds...

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gm52n2t7su99g2i8ss70dut52bpmrkft5p@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:43:58 GMT, "Gary Owens" <gowens1@cfl.rr.com>
> wrote:
> > They tried to put Wind mills near the Kennedy compound in Mass. Didn't
> > happen
>
> Only because they figured out that all the hot air coming from the
> Kennedy compound would interfere with the normal prevailing winds...

I thought that was why they wanted them there in the first place. Otherwise, they'd have been
looking somewhere like west Texas where you never have to worry about a shortage of wind.

On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:55:05 +0000, in
<ZUldh.26167$wP1.24104@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net> , Chris Guynn wrote:
> I thought that was why they wanted them there in the first place.
> Otherwise, they'd have been looking somewhere like west Texas where you
> never have to worry about a shortage of wind.

I suspect that they were wanting to get the winds off the ocean, but the
hot air from the Kennedy compound was coming from the other way and
screwed it up...