Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:44:48 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

>Like the lazy snob you are.

I'm no snob.

>> >"Bike" certainly not meaning "motorcycle".
>>
>> You know better.
>
>No, I dont.
>
>You called it.

Then I guess you'll never believe my story about shilling for the
cops, huh?

JF

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wfydnRi12opdPuPeRVn-sQ@wavecable.com...

> fuck
> asshole
> shit
> pussy
> fucking
> Fuck off.

You're on a roll now, John. Just a teensy bit more and his head will start
spinning. Works every time.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:03:39 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

>Stand for something just once in your miserable fucking life.
>
>Just once.

Interesting comment, given the gist of this thread..

JF

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:avcun1tou251jd5sm5q4se3q5cne5gqbqh@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:03:39 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

> >Stand for something just once in your miserable fucking life.

> >Just once.

> Interesting comment, given the gist of this thread.

Once again, despite your constant machinations about "I dont want to disarm
everyone.", "Why is it when I type in that I dont want to disarm everyone,
it doesnt come out on other peoples screens?", etc, ad infinitum, ad
nauseum, you do another complete 180.

So, John, lets just see if we can nail down just one or two things that come
out of that fucking mud puddle you call a brain;

Am "I a shill for the cops" or a "responsible gun owner"?

Do you or do you not want to disarm everyone?

Here we are after 3000 posts, and no one has any fucking idea where you
stand on anything.

Fuck it, you are a waste of time and air.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:11nssom34jkjnda@corp.supernews.com...
>
> When I'm elected President,

Greg for President!!

JOF wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:14:16 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> But I'm still thinking about it.
>> Dont hurt yourself, the conclusion is really quite simple.
>
> You wouldn't understand, but thinking isn't always a painful process.

you do not think, you 'feel' your way to a conclusion.
that is a big difference. you are not bound by logic.

>
> JF
>

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:51:52 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

>"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:avcun1tou251jd5sm5q4se3q5cne5gqbqh@4ax.com.. .
>
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:03:39 -0800, "Scott"
>> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >Stand for something just once in your miserable fucking life.
>
>> >Just once.
>
>> Interesting comment, given the gist of this thread.
>
>Once again, despite your constant machinations about "I dont want to disarm
>everyone.", "Why is it when I type in that I dont want to disarm everyone,
>it doesnt come out on other peoples screens?", etc, ad infinitum, ad
>nauseum, you do another complete 180.

I don't follow your reasoning there.

>So, John, lets just see if we can nail down just one or two things that come
>out of that fucking mud puddle you call a brain;
>
>Am "I a shill for the cops" or a "responsible gun owner"?

I have no idea what your relationship is with the cops. I would assume
that you have some official status. I'd be amazed if the police would
use a civilian as bait in a sting, particularly an ongoing one. Seems
like that would leave them wide open to all kinds of liability.

I've always given you the benefit of the doubt as to being a
responsible gun owner. Not having met you I can only accept your
written commitment to doing the right thing with your guns. Besides
that, I've met Doug, several times, and I believe that for all his
tough attitude, he's a good guy with the best intentions who will bend
over backwards to be a responsible gun owner as he defines it. He
seems onside with you and that's good enough for me. I have a hunch
that despite your mercurial temper you are not unlike Doug in terms of
knowing what's right.

>Do you or do you not want to disarm everyone?

I have absolutely no interest in seeing everyone disarmed. The key
word there is everyone.

>Here we are after 3000 posts, and no one has any fucking idea where you
>stand on anything.

There are some folks who can't seem to understand the concept of
middle of the road. That's not my fault.

>Fuck it, you are a waste of time and air.

Then don't respond. That's your choice.

JF

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9cfun1ds0r4v9lfe8jktkenu1lnr1j8ais@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:51:52 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:avcun1tou251jd5sm5q4se3q5cne5gqbqh@4ax.com. ..
>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:03:39 -0800, "Scott"
>>> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >Stand for something just once in your miserable fucking life.
>>
>>> >Just once.
>>
>>> Interesting comment, given the gist of this thread.
>>
>>Once again, despite your constant machinations about "I dont want to
>>disarm
>>everyone.", "Why is it when I type in that I dont want to disarm everyone,
>>it doesnt come out on other peoples screens?", etc, ad infinitum, ad
>>nauseum, you do another complete 180.
>
> I don't follow your reasoning there.

'Sokay, everyone else does.

>>So, John, lets just see if we can nail down just one or two things that
>>come
>>out of that fucking mud puddle you call a brain;
>>
>>Am "I a shill for the cops" or a "responsible gun owner"?
>
> I have no idea what your relationship is with the cops. I would assume
> that you have some official status. I'd be amazed if the police would
> use a civilian as bait in a sting, particularly an ongoing one. Seems
> like that would leave them wide open to all kinds of liability.
>
> I've always given you the benefit of the doubt as to being a
> responsible gun owner. Not having met you I can only accept your
> written commitment to doing the right thing with your guns. Besides
> that, I've met Doug, several times, and I believe that for all his
> tough attitude, he's a good guy with the best intentions who will bend
> over backwards to be a responsible gun owner as he defines it. He
> seems onside with you and that's good enough for me. I have a hunch
> that despite your mercurial temper you are not unlike Doug in terms of
> knowing what's right.
>
>>Do you or do you not want to disarm everyone?
>
> I have absolutely no interest in seeing everyone disarmed. The key
> word there is everyone.
>
>>Here we are after 3000 posts, and no one has any fucking idea where you
>>stand on anything.
>
> There are some folks who can't seem to understand the concept of
> middle of the road. That's not my fault.
>
>>Fuck it, you are a waste of time and air.
>
> Then don't respond. That's your choice.
>
> JF
>

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9cfun1ds0r4v9lfe8jktkenu1lnr1j8ais@4ax.com...

> I have no idea what your relationship is with the cops.

<snip the rest of the flowery bullshit that completely avoids a simple,
honest, direct answer>

Then why did you call me a shill? (and you wonder why you never heard the
story before)

Just trying to piss me off so you could later comment on my "mercurial
temper"?

You aren't half as clever as you like to think John. Transparent as a sheet
of clean glass.

Senile is the word that comes to mind. That and the obvious effects of the
alcohol makes you post some really stupid, contradictory garbage.

> There are some folks who can't seem to understand the concept of
> middle of the road. That's not my fault.

And you are patently unable to understand that you absolutely represent no
"middle of the road" position, and never have, no matter how cleverly you
think you camouflage your words. With you there is no middle to this road.
After people like you reduce the 4 lane road to one, there is no longer room
for two vehicles at once. Since you have the spine of a jelly fish, you get
run off into the ditch.

> >Fuck it, you are a waste of time and air.

> Then don't respond. That's your choice.

Actually, I am going to respond, just because you cant keep your fucking
mouth shut about American gun rights. You get some kind of kick out of
dragging these threads out for weeks, changing your colors as often as a
tree in the fall wind. It's all some kind of little game to you. You like
pissing good people off on this subject. Your hope is to wear people out
arguing with you, and then claim some kind of "win". You havent won a single
debate on the issue yet. All you have done is piss good people off, and make
many of actually, actively resent you.

I had you in the killfile for the longest time because I was sick of your
insults and your holier-than-thou, "mercurial" attempts at insult and
condescending, weird need to feel like you are controlling people.

You never have anything to say about diving, only Americans and guns.

Every time you beak off about American gun rights, I am going to pound you
and your bullshit like cheap meat.

Count on it.

Asshole.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:53:43 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:


>Senile is the word that comes to mind. That and the obvious effects of the
>alcohol makes you post some really stupid, contradictory garbage.

I posted that drinking coffee this morning before heading out for
work. You're not likely to find me under the influence at 9 in the
morning.

JF