Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace.

John Francis wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:53:43 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Senile is the word that comes to mind. That and the obvious effects of the
> >alcohol makes you post some really stupid, contradictory garbage.
>
> I posted that drinking coffee this morning before heading out for
> work. You're not likely to find me under the influence at 9 in the
> morning.
>
Not everyone understands that logic.

Geo

chilly wrote:
> "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
> news:11nssom34jkjnda@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>When I'm elected President,
>
>
> Greg for President!!
>
>
Followed shortly after by another Kennedy scenario

--
“The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their
neutrality in times of moral crisis.”

"John Francis" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fioun1do4bclmmgmt9qjt5e2i89t1gti8r@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:44:50 -0500, "Popeye"
> <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>> >Stand for something just once in your miserable fucking life.
>>>>
>>>>> >Just once.
>>>>
>>>>> Interesting comment, given the gist of this thread.
>>>>
>>>>Once again, despite your constant machinations about "I dont want to
>>>>disarm
>>>>everyone.", "Why is it when I type in that I dont want to disarm
>>>>everyone,
>>>>it doesnt come out on other peoples screens?", etc, ad infinitum, ad
>>>>nauseum, you do another complete 180.
>>>
>>> I don't follow your reasoning there.
>>
>> 'Sokay, everyone else does.
>
> Everyone?

Everyone -else-...


>
> JF
>

"John Francis" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0doun114m0es65pmoq4v44gusvsvspsi5a@4ax.com...

> I envy those folks who have all the necessary information on a
> subject from day one.

Or you could try to conceptualize that -your- first day is this context
was about 25 YEARS -after- mine.

That's why I posted the 5 year old thread, which was the first OT Gun
thread, at least since my arrival.

If you would go back and read that entire thread, THE ENTIRE THREAD, and
takes notes/ questions to ask if you wish, I will buy you a bottle of real
estate trouser value Scotch, or donate the money to DAN in your name.

Bring us back some coherent questions, and stop protesting your pro-gun
stance, because no one's buyin it.

As far as middle of the road around here,

THAT WOULD BE ME, not you.

>It's particularly impressive in these fast-changing times.

I'm a particularly impressive guy.

"Geo" <ghmorris@candlelight.ca> wrote in message
news:1132422765.592521.282740@g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

> Not everyone understands that logic.

Logic and 90% of what John posts are mutually exclusive.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:23:58 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

>"John Francis" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4moun1116n2l86d347lllqldqbfdg5kkdj@4ax.com.. .
>
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:53:43 -0800, "Scott"
>> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Once again, no direct answers, and no denials.

I deny it.

>> >Senile is the word that comes to mind. That and the obvious effects of
>the
>> >alcohol makes you post some really stupid, contradictory garbage.
>>
>> I posted that drinking coffee this morning before heading out for
>> work. You're not likely to find me under the influence at 9 in the
>> morning.
>
>So you say. I wasnt talking about hs mornings post, but nice spin, not.
>
>One of my buds busted two DUI's last saturday, took one to jail at 07:30,
>and picked off another one 3 blocks from the jail at quarter to 9.

Ergo I must be drunk at 9am. Impeccable logic.

JF

"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
news:j_qdnYnsfek4HuLeRVn-oQ@comcast.com...

>> Greg for President!!
>>
> Followed shortly after by another Kennedy scenario

A scandal with Marilyn Monroe?

Greg Mossman wrote:
> "dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
> news:j_qdnYnsfek4HuLeRVn-oQ@comcast.com...
>
>
>>>Greg for President!!
>>>
>>
>>Followed shortly after by another Kennedy scenario
>
>
> A scandal with Marilyn Monroe?
>
>
if you want to add that to your fantasies

--
“The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their
neutrality in times of moral crisis.”

"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
news:S4WdnZDN8fG6PeLeRVn-sA@comcast.com...

>>>Followed shortly after by another Kennedy scenario
>>
>>
>> A scandal with Marilyn Monroe?
> if you want to add that to your fantasies

Only if I can substitute a live actress of my choice. Marilyn's a bit ripe
by now.

dazed and confuzzed wrote:

> Greg Mossman wrote:
>
>> "dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
>> news:S4WdnZDN8fG6PeLeRVn-sA@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>>>>> Followed shortly after by another Kennedy scenario
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A scandal with Marilyn Monroe?
>>>
>>>
>>> if you want to add that to your fantasies
>>
>>
>>
>> Only if I can substitute a live actress of my choice. Marilyn's a bit
>> ripe by now.
>>
> Be sure to make the Presidential Lincoln a convertible....
>
make that "Presidential Limo a Lincoln Convertible"

--
“The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their
neutrality in times of moral crisis.”