|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 686. Popeye Apr 6 2000, 2:00 am show options Newsgroups: rec.scuba From: buzcutt...@aol.comMJBBITZ (Popeye) - Find messages by this author Date: 2000/04/06 Subject: Re: Gun Control (OT) - Marcel says it as it is! Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse >Popeye, from your previous posts you seemed to be one of the smarter > >pro-gun people in this thread, but you are sinking...maybe it's >instinctive... And yet, this lower level seems to be right where you and I meet.... Your answer is at the bottom of the pro-gun diatribe.Sorry! Luap, I'd say the deadliest weapon in the world would be a Phd in nuclear physics or biochemistry. One person, with one of these, could kill a hundred million, or perhaps the entire human race. So when do these become illegal? The deadliest small arm in the world is, was, and will always be the pump shotgun, available at Wal-mart for around $125.00, no waiting period to my knowledge. This weapon, readily available and already predominant in many American households, can issue 60 projectiles with a magnum powder charge in under 4 seconds, lethal to 150 yards. No other weapon readily availible can touch that. Not a handgun, although it can be cut down to near that size. Not an assault rifle. Not a machine gun. But people entrenched in anti-gun media-hype hysterics just don't understand. Which is why, from a position of their near total ignorance, and fear, I don't want them making any decisions that affect my right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Get it? One Congressman, when asked what an assualt weapon was, said: "A weapon that can be fired from the hip". What a maroon. Then they owtlawed bayonet lugs (the metal clip a bayonet attaches to on the rifle). Did we have a rash of bayonet attacks? Wouldn't this be a stabbing? But that's the logic I see from your side of the argument. I see the problem, better than you do. Until we address social ills and revitalize our justice system, this violence problem will not go away. It has to do with our schools, our communities, Drugs, Hollywood, how much TV and how little parental attention the kids get. Greed. Opportunity. And a bunch of other stuff that has nothing to do with my firearms. I'd like to see drug related gunviolence separated from other gun statistics, for the same reason that drunk driving accidents are separated from other car accidents. If you've ever paid money for drugs at any level, you have contributed to drug/gun violence. Chew on that. You (Marcel,Fish,Greg) see me as a contributor to this problem. you have no basis for that opinion. I merely wish to defend myself from a problem not of my making. I have an exellent basis for that opinion. You should study the "Gun Control Act of 1968". This is the Federal law that says who can own what. It's a decent law, although it does lump switch blades with rocket launchers. With a permit, you can own a .50 caliber belt fed weapon (Big Assed Machine Gun, in case you didn't know). I have no problem with that if you are obeying the law. People collect machine guns for the same reasons that they collect butterflies and model trains and WW1bi-planes. As to your snide reference to my instinctive sinking, the point I was making was that in this country, we have the freedom to do as we choose. As long as I don't break the law, It's none of your business if I collect machine guns. Whether you think I need one or not has no bearing. And finally, to answer your question, in this Glorious Country, an individual with the apropriate license or permit can own a fighter plane, aircraft carrier, submarine or a tank. This is not a joke, and is AOK by me. Me personally, Luap, I already own just about every firearm I wish to. I think automatic weapons are for people who need to improve their marksmanship skills (although they are really fun to shoot). Sorry this was long, but I'm home with the Flu (got it from Mike Blitch, one of those internet viruses you hear about). By the way, of which firearm free democracy are you a denizen? Popeye I Dive, Therefore I Am www.ssminnowcharters.com www.diverssupply.com My favorite dive boat and shop |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What happens to a dis-armed populace. | Douglas W. \Popeye\ Frederick | Croatia | 685 | 03-26-2007 07:44 PM |
| Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace. | Popeye | Croatia | 65 | 03-26-2007 07:40 PM |
| Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace. | Douglas W. \Popeye\ Frederick | Croatia | 54 | 03-26-2007 07:35 PM |
| Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace. | Doug Frederick | Croatia | 1 | 03-26-2007 07:34 PM |
| Re: What happens to a dis-armed populace. | Douglas W. \Popeye\ Frederick | Croatia | 12 | 03-26-2007 07:32 PM |