Rescue Me.

Dan Bracuk <NOTbracuk@pathcom.com> wrote:

> I tried it and didn't like it. Too keyboard unfreindly. I
> forget the details.

That's because you're not smart enough, Dan.

Thus spake Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> :

>On Mon, 7 May 2007 02:35:57 -0400, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
><Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Does Vista have Outlook Express, and where is it?
>>
>> Your timely answer could save random innocent lives.
>>
>
>Vista... Just say, "NO"...

Dell isn't going to Vista until Oct. At least internally. Same for
Intel, Freescale, Motorola, TI, etc. Is there a trend?
--
dillon

The pen may be mightier than the sword, but I've never
seen a .sig beat a Sig.

On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:18:33 -0500, Dillon Pyron
<dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote:

> Dell isn't going to Vista until Oct. At least internally. Same for
> Intel, Freescale, Motorola, TI, etc. Is there a trend?

Probably not any more so than with the new release of any other O/S
(especially one from MSFT)... Large corporations want time to test
their apps to see what gets broke by the new O/S... Often they rely on
3rd party applications and libraries which might not work under the
new O/S... MSFT is not in the business of creating a stable O/S that
developers can develop towards and never have to worry about changing
their application... MSFT is in the business of making changes just
for the sake of changing things so that developers will constantly
need to be modifying their apps so that they can work on the O/S
version du jour... Of course, this also means that the other software
that MSFT sells also needs to be updated... Combine that with the fact
that they let their O/S get more bloated with each version and one
could argue that they are also in the business of selling hardware...

"Sharkie" <sharkdba@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179176147.271205.47890@k79g2000hse.googlegro ups.com...
> On May 7, 1:35 am, "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick"
> <Pop...@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote:
>> Does Vista have Outlook Express, and where is it?
>>
>> Your timely answer could save random innocent lives.
>
>
> Well, it's like asking: "does Chevrolet Impala have a roofrack, and
> where is it?"
>
> Although they're both made by the same company (Microsoft),
> they're separate products.
>
> Vista is an operating system (like car make/model: Chevrolet Impala),
> while Outlook Express is an add-on piece of software (like car
> accessory: roofrack).
>
> Whether there is one depends if previous owner (retailer if you bought
> new) decided
> to install this particular piece of software.
>
> Piece of advice: unless your employer requires it, use a different
> mail client.

For anyone that didn't catch it, OE allows me to read RS and my mail in the
same place (so I don't wander out into cyberspace and get lost).

As soon as I get back from... TORONTO (Ooohhhhhh Carrrrrlllllllll), We'll
have to teach Popeye about newsreaders.

I just got the mount for the 20" flatscreen on the dash of the truck for
maps.

And coming back soon- Buzcutt454!!(@finalprotectivefire.com).

I just bought an old 454 Suburban for a dive-mo-beel.

On 14 May 2007 13:55:47 -0700, Sharkie <sharkdba@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Well, it's like asking: "does Chevrolet Impala have a roofrack, and
> where is it?"
>
> Although they're both made by the same company (Microsoft),
> they're separate products.
>
> Vista is an operating system (like car make/model: Chevrolet Impala),
> while Outlook Express is an add-on piece of software (like car
> accessory: roofrack).
>
> Whether there is one depends if previous owner (retailer if you bought
> new) decided to install this particular piece of software.

Actually, OE has come with the default distribution of various flavors
of Windows over the years... A better comparison would be between a
car and the tires... It comes with one particular brand, it might not
be the best, but it works -- and you're free to change it to your
personal preference...

> Piece of advice: unless your employer requires it, use a different
> mail client.

OE is acceptable as long as you can learn not to click on everything
that gets sent to you... There are better email clients out there and
*definitely* better newsgroup readers, but it works well enough... I
have quite a few different machines on my home network and it's quite
likely that they all have at least one different email or newsgroup
client other than OE... Although there are better clients than OE,
there are also worse -- Lotus Notes and cc:Mail come to mind...
<blech>

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:134htih3h9bp3ae@news.supernews.com...

> And coming back soon- Buzcutt454!!(@finalprotectivefire.com).
>
> I just bought an old 454 Suburban for a dive-mo-beel.

No muckin' about with faggoty BMW, Lexus, Accura and the rest of the
metrosexual SUV trash.