OT: "Rebels"

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:41373493$0$104$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com...
> "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10jebn894o8v915@corp.supernews.com...

> The KKK office is that a way ---->

No, I'm thinking it's this direction:
|
|
|
|
\ | /
\ /
V

"ben bradlee" <up2u2figr@NoWay.zip> wrote in message
news:l-WdnYjUnc5Bp6rcRVn-ig@centurytel.net...
>
> "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
> news:41373493$0$104$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com...
> > "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:10jebn894o8v915@corp.supernews.com...
>
> > The KKK office is that a way ---->

This is why I killfile you, you piece of shit.

Carl Nisarel wrote:
>
> But heard, half-heard in the stillness, Scott writes --
>
> > What I have a problem understanding is how anyone, for any
> > reason, in any way, can have any reaction at all towards
> > mass murdering Islamic terrorists (AKA "ragheads") other
> > than absolute resolve to remove their shadows from the
> > earth, and to remove their hatred and voices from mankind.
>
> You have a lot in common with Timothy McVeigh.
>
> You and those like you and McVeigh should be removed from
> mankind.

and you are just an agitator,
a master baiter in public newsgroups.

"Crownfield" <Crownfield@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4137376B.92D@cox.net...

> and you are just an agitator,
> a master baiter in public newsgroups.

Only because we empower him by reading and replying to his bullshit.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:41373493$0$104$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com...
> "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10jebn894o8v915@corp.supernews.com...
>
> > Muslims seem to have a pretty good corner on the market.
>
> No. Christians, by far, have been the worst terrorists this world has
ever
> seen. Take Adolf Hitler, one of the worst of the foul Christians.
Timothy
> McVeigh was another. What's your derogatory name for these people, "Jesus
> freaks"?

Only a dimwit like you would think Hitler was Christian.

>
> Obviously you have a bone to pick with Arabs. All we ask is that you keep
> your racist rantings to yourself. The KKK office is that a way ---->
>
>

Dennis

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:010920042302572250%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...

> Words to live by.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3621896.stm

In article <10jek2lj4qfpm1b@corp.supernews.com>, Scott
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

€ "Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
€ news:010920042302572250%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...
€
€ > Words to live by.
€
€ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3621896.stm
€
€


I'm not sure what your point is. Although all Al-Qaeda members are
Muslims, not all Muslims are members of Al-Qaeda or other terrorist
groups. Likewise, although all Al-Qaeda members are arabs, not all
arabs are Al-Qaeda members, and not everyone from the middle east is an
arab. They might all look alike to you, but then Americans and
Frenchmen look alike to many non-white cultures. I'm sure you wouldn't
ahve a problem with someone calling you a Frenchman, would you

Alan

But heard, half-heard in the stillness, Dennis (Icarus)
writes --

>> IOW, you know that Scott's an ignorant bigot and you're
>> trying to spin his spew.
>
> IOW, Scott is intelligent and tolerant,

You keep on spinning. Scott is neither intelligent nor
tolerant.

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:020920041031328431%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...

> I'm not sure what your point is. Although all Al-Qaeda members are
> Muslims, not all Muslims are members of Al-Qaeda or other terrorist
> groups. Likewise, although all Al-Qaeda members are arabs, not all
> arabs are Al-Qaeda members, and not everyone from the middle east is an
> arab. They might all look alike to you, but then Americans and
> Frenchmen look alike to many non-white cultures. I'm sure you wouldn't
> ahve a problem with someone calling you a Frenchman, would you

I am not the one who inferred any of the typical leftie hyperbole above. I
never said all Arabs or Muslims were assholes, you and that fucking liar
Mossman did.

I called the murdering pieces of shit ragheads, mainly because in all the
photo's you see of them taunting, marching and chanting with RPG's and
rifles, or standing before, and in the act of beheading, the innocents they
have kidnapped, their faces and heads are covered by cloth. Simple. You all
make it into some kind of reason to hate me and America, while
simultaneously being much greater bigots (great in the sense of size, not
goodness) than anyone you look down your nose at.

The simple fact that the huge majority of terrorist acts, mass murders,
kidnappings, executions and beheadings since the 1950's are committed by
Islamic fundamentalist fucking ragheads, doesn't make me a member of the KKK
(as that piece of shit Mossman like to infer), it simply means that I have
the temerity to see the enemy for who and what they are, and to name them
accordingly. It is the lefties inability to make a simple decision to call
an apple an apple, that gives the murderers the room in which they operate.
They use our tolerance to kill us and subjugate us to their intolerance.
They aren't rebels, insurgents, gunmen, dissident or radicals, they are
Islamic terrorists; ragheads. You and the leftist media just cant bring
yourselves to call them what they are, and that is your weakness, not mine.
All you and your PC bullshit amount to is another way to control another
persons thoughts and words. You don't like it, killfile me.

You lefties see, and in fact name Bush and the Republican party as the
enemy, which is not only galactically wrong, but infinitely stupid and
dangerous. The democrat party has gone off the deep end, and in a big way.
Did Bush, Halliburton, Cheney, etc cause the hostage situation in Russia?

What is it going to take? All the bombings and murders perpetrated in
Allah's name haven't gotten through your paper thick party line skulls yet,
including 9/11. Is it going to take a nuclear detonation in LA? Nerve gas in
San Diego? WTF do you need to understand the obvious?

You all want to kiss and make up with them, apologize, justify, obfuscate,
twist, spin and whatever else it is you do other than kill them, go ahead. I
want them dead. And I want the people who teach kids to kill in Allah's name
dead. I want the mullahs and clerics who preach murder in exchange for
paradise dead. I want the governments that tolerate mass murderers run under
the bus, bombed into oblivion.

You lefties want to elect what is quite easily the biggest piece of shit
ever admitted to political office. He has told so many fucking lies he cant
remember them all, nor can his campaign managers, and you fuckers don't
care. Which is *exactly* why Kerry will lose, and lose big. I keep asking
one of you to show any single piece of legislation that Kerry introduced and
carried in is 19 years sucking a check out of the American people. ZERO.
Explain how a guy who votes 100% of the time against America and its defense
appropriations is going to make a "stronger America". Who's going to defend
us, the French??? The fucking UN? The situation in Darfur is a shining
example of the effectiveness of the UN and its policies. But, I suppose
that's Bush's fault too, right?

Get a grip on reality.

Deny the media bias and blackouts. Keep chanting the same, long ago proven
lies fed to you by that fat piece of shit Moore. That is exactly what is
costing the left this election.

http://www.anncoulter.com/
The New York Times has a new typewriter key for the Swift Boat Veterans
story that reads: "the unsubstantiated charges of the Swift Boat Veterans."

Unsubstantiated? It was Kerry - not the Swift Boat Veterans - who told The
Washington Post: "I wish they had a delete button on LexisNexis." The Swift
Boat Veterans haven't been forced to retract any of their story. Meanwhile,
John Kerry has been issuing about a retraction a day since the Swift Boat
Veterans started talking.

Most recently, Kerry has had to backpedal on the circumstances surrounding
his first Purple Heart. Kerry has described the action on Dec. 2, 1968, for
which he received a Purple Heart as his "first intense combat." The Swift
Boat veterans say Kerry came under no enemy fire that day and that his
injury, such as it was, resulted from the ricochet of a grenade fired by
Kerry himself. (This rules out the Purple Heart but does qualify him for
another "Boy, is my face red" citation, with clusters.)

Among the eyewitnesses who say Kerry came under no enemy fire on Dec. 2,
1968, is John Kerry himself. According to Douglas Brinkley's book, "Tour of
Duty," Kerry wrote in his diary nine days later, on Dec. 11, 1968: "We
hadn't been shot at yet." His campaign is still trying to figure out how to
claim that Kerry couldn't have known this because he wasn't even on his own
swiftboat at the time.

A Kerry campaign official first explained the discrepancy by essentially
explaining that it depends on what the meaning of "we" is. Kerry, the
official said, apparently had a nontraditional understanding of the word
"we" to mean: "others not including me." "We": another two-letter word
successfully parsed by a Democrat!

Another Kerry campaign official, John Hurley, has since admitted that it is
"possible" that Kerry's first Purple Heart came from a self-inflicted wound.

The Kerry campaign has refused to release Kerry's personal Vietnam archive,
including his journals and letters, saying that the senator was
contractually bound to grant Kerry hagiographer Doug Brinkley exclusive
access to the material. But then Brinkley said the papers are the property
of the senator and in his full control. Still, no records.

On the bright side, the Kerry campaign is considering releasing the
director's cut of Kerry's own filmed re-enactments of his war "heroics" -
which, by the way, makes Kerry the first person ever to form a war
re-enactment club during the actual war.

Kerry had long maintained that he did not attend the 1971 meeting of Vietnam
Veterans Against the War in Kansas City, Mo., where the assassination of
U.S. senators was discussed. Kerry campaign spokesman David Wade said,
"Kerry was not at the Kansas City meeting." Later, FBI files showed Kerry
was at the meeting. Now Kerry admits he was there.

So I think that means John Kerry attended as many V.V.A.W. meetings at which
the assassination of U.S. senators was discussed as he did meetings of the
Senate Intelligence Committee on which he later sat.

And let's not forget that Kerry was caught telling a big, dirty, stinky lie
about being in Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968. What kind of adult tells a
lie like that? (Answer: The kind who carries a home-movie camera to war in
order to re-enact combat scenes and tape fake interviews with himself.)

One of the principal witnesses for Kerry's version of his heroics in Vietnam
is Jim Rassman, who says Kerry "saved his life" after a Viet Cong mine
knocked Rassman off his boat. Though Kerry would have us believe that - in
addition to being baby killers - his fellow servicemen were planning on
leaving Rassman to die, several eyewitnesses say another boat was about 20
yards behind Kerry's boat in getting to Rassman. (Kerry's boat was
positioned slightly closer to Rassman because the moment the mine exploded,
Kerry's boat fled the scene and returned only when Kerry was certain there
was no enemy fire.)

It is indisputable that other men were being pulled out of the water right
and left after a Viet Cong mine blew one of the swiftboats four feet in the
air. How come none of those guys got Bronze Stars? Did they pull men out of
the water in a less heroic way?

The way Kerry and Rassman tell it, you would think Kerry saved Rassman's
life by staging a daring, high-speed commando raid on a prisoner of war
camp. I was pulled from churning surfs a dozen times before I was 10 years
old, each time exclaiming, "YOU SAVED MY LIFE!" but I'm not seeking out the
people who fished me out of the water and demanding that they run for
president.

In determining whose memory is more accurate, it's worth mentioning that
Kerry and Rassman can't even get their stories straight about whose boat
Rassman was on. Among the many accounts out there are these:

In his own Aug. 10, 2004, Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rassman says he was on
Kerry's boat: "The second blast blew me off John's swiftboat, PCF-94 ..."

But according to the Kerry campaign press release: "On March 13, 1969,
Rassman, a Green Beret, was traveling down the Bay Hap river in a boat
behind Kerry's when both were ambushed by exploding land mines and enemy
fire coming from the shore."

On Page 106 of the book "John F. Kerry, The Official Biography by the Boston
Globe Reporters Who Know Him Best," Rassman is on a boat behind Kerry's.

In his Kerry campaign pamphlet, "Tour of Duty," hagiographer Brinkley
resolves the conflicting accounts by having Rassman fall off both the boat
that hit the mine (PCF-3) and Kerry's boat. (What would we do without
historians?)

Another account has Rassman on the S.S. Minnow stubbornly insisting that
Kerry's service in Vietnam consisted of just a three-hour tour ... a
three-hour tour ...

Perhaps like the many and various meanings of the word "we," liberals use
the word "unsubstantiated" to mean "tested repeatedly and proved true."

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:V7IZc.42328$5s3.4444@fe40.usenetserver.com...
> "Carl Nisarel" <hostlbuddha@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:Xns95586BB2EEF7Chostlbuddha@130.133.1.4...
> > But heard, half-heard in the stillness, Scott writes --
> >
> > >> Muslims are not exclusively terrorists.
> > >
> > > Muslims seem to have a pretty good corner on the market.
> >
> > McVeigh.
>
> Lets include the olymic park bomber and the Unabomber.
>
> thats 3 to how many since, say, 1983?
>
>
>
> Dennis
>
>
>

Olympic Park Bomber = Eric Rudolph... Hide and Go Seek Champion of the world
1998,1999,2000

Unabomber = Ted Kuchinski (sp?)