|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Think about this (This was sent to me, it is unverified) Food for thought.......... Most of us haven't thought about this -- no matter how much we like or dislike John Kerry. Even an estimate of this cost is staggering. If elected, you and I (or those of us who actually pay taxes) will pay upkeep and secret service protection for five Kerry mansions here in the United States plus those he and his wife own abroad. It is good to be John F. Kerry...the F stands for Forbes in case you ever wondered. He is one of the richest senators in government and he married even richer. Their properties certainly reflect their opulent lifestyle. When someone is elected president, the Secret Service has to protect this person and family as well as their property - for as long as the president and his spouse lives! 1. Beacon Hill, Boston $6.9 million As mentioned, the Kerry's have five US properties and several foreign properties. The cost to run one of these homes for a year is more than upper middle income Americans could afford, even if the rent was free, and all you had to pay was the water, gas & electric bills (we won't mention ground keepers, maintenance, pool, cooks and house keepers). 2. Fox Chapel, PA $3.7 million (this is their "shanty") If Kerry becomes president each property requires staffed secret service security 24 hours a day. Security improvements to each home will come at tax payer expense. Even if the Kerry's never use all the properties - they will be retrofitted -- just in case they drop by for a weekend. Facilities for the secret service agents must also be provided on each property. Who do you think will pay for this? We pay! This takes all the expense off Kerry and puts it on us. Bill Clinton is paying for his New York manor house by charging the government monthly rent for the required secret service facility. The monthly rent is nearly three times more than his mortgage payment. So we the tax payers are buying his house and he pockets the extra money from the rent on the secret service facility. Then he gets to write off the interest on his mortgage. Well, he was broke from defending his immoral skullduggery and his wife's little scandals, so maybe we should feel sorry for poor old Slick Willie. 3. Georgetown, Washington D.C. $4.7 million 4. Ketchum, Idaho $4.92 million What does it cost to staff one property in terms of secret service agents? Let's just talk about his American properties. Each property would require 5 agents per 6 hour shift 4 times a day 365 days a year for the rest of Kerry's life and however long his widow might live. In addition, we pay to house and feed these agents at each property for the duration. Do the math. Five properties requiring five agents per shift, times four shifts. That is 20 agents per day per property, 365 days per year. Lets say each agent receives a salary of about $60K (this doesn't include insurance, retirement, etc.; add 30% of salary for that). There will also be vehicles, repairs, gas, and other miscellaneous costs. Straight salary and benefits for 100 agents for one year would cost $7,800,000. We can only guess at the cost of retrofitting each property, building the facility necessary to house the agents and the monthly rent for each facility. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5. Nantucket, MA $9.18 million ~~ On the other hand, George Bush owns one house - the one at his ranch in Crawford, Texas ~~ Again, who pays? You and I pay. I don't mind one property; heck I wouldn't even complain about two - but five in the U.S. and those abroad? Perhaps Mr. and Mrs. Kerry should offer to foot the bill for all but two of these properties if they want me to consider his candidacy. Does it make sense to spend this kind of money on his excessive life style when he and Mrs. Heinz-Kerry can better afford it?? Paying for the Kerry mansions is only a small part of my concern about this man sitting in the White House. Tax and spend Kerry - that's his party motto. I'd rather see the money we'd spend protecting his fancy properties go toward health care, our military and homeland security. Which America does he live in?? Not the same one I live in - that's for sure! Please pass the mustard; do America a favor and pass this to your friends. Let's keep Bush a resident of the White House rather than spend millions and millions to protect Kerry's preferred lifestyle and opulent properties. We'd save an incredible amount of money for more deserving programs. Oh, and viva Del Monte Ketchup! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message news:a1732$41839141$ce504902$32345@allthenewsgroup s.com... > Think about this (This was sent to me, it is unverified) You guys are getting real desperate, we can plainly see. Worried? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Joe English <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote: > Think about this (This was sent to me, it is unverified) Bunch of debunked BS.... http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/secret.asp -- Mike NAR #70953 - Sr/HPR Level-1 ~ BEMRC - NAR Section #627 NO Junk Email, please! Real email to: amphoto [at] blarg [dot] net. <WANTED: Experienced Kamikaze Pilot> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Mike Pearson <see .sig>" <nojunk@this_address.com> wrote in message news:1gmgxgg.1704isl95fha8N%nojunk@this_address.co m... > Joe English <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote: > >> Think about this (This was sent to me, it is unverified) > > Bunch of debunked BS.... > > http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/secret.asp "The only thing sillier than that notion that taxes would have to be raised to protect a putative President Kerry is the suggestion that the cost of Secret Service protection should be a factor in voters' choosing who should serve as President of the United States." But Republicans' arguments certainly are getting sillier by the minute as we count down the remaining pre-Election Day hours with Bin Laden alive and well, ever-increasing military casualties in the unnecessary war in Iraq, more revelations about Halliburton's secret misdealings, missing explosives, and the obvious fact that our president is a dumbshit. No wonder the undecideds are switching to Kerry at a breakneck pace. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > "Mike Pearson <see .sig>" <nojunk@this_address.com> wrote in message > news:1gmgxgg.1704isl95fha8N%nojunk@this_address.co m... > >>Joe English <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote: >> >> >>>Think about this (This was sent to me, it is unverified) >> >>Bunch of debunked BS.... >> >>http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/secret.asp > > > "The only thing sillier than that notion that taxes would have to be raised > to protect a putative President Kerry is the suggestion that the cost of > Secret Service protection should be a factor in voters' choosing who should > serve as President of the United States." > > But Republicans' arguments certainly are getting sillier by the minute as we > count down the remaining pre-Election Day hours with Bin Laden alive and > well, ever-increasing military casualties in the unnecessary war in Iraq, > more revelations about Halliburton's secret misdealings, missing explosives, > and the obvious fact that our president is a dumbshit. No wonder the > undecideds are switching to Kerry at a breakneck pace. > > I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message news:7d396$41841f8b$ce504822$1315@allthenewsgroups .com... > I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. But you didn't tell us it was completely fabricated. Your information source is suspect and that tarnishes the credibility of anything you have to say. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message > news:7d396$41841f8b$ce504822$1315@allthenewsgroups .com... > > >>I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. > > > But you didn't tell us it was completely fabricated. Your information > source is suspect and that tarnishes the credibility of anything you have to > say. > > I learned from you |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message news:82074$41845e83$ce504822$14602@allthenewsgroup s.com... > Greg Mossman wrote: > > "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message > > news:7d396$41841f8b$ce504822$1315@allthenewsgroups .com... > > > > > >>I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. > > > > > > But you didn't tell us it was completely fabricated. Your information > > source is suspect and that tarnishes the credibility of anything you have to > > say. > > > > > I learned from you Touché |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message > news:7d396$41841f8b$ce504822$1315@allthenewsgroups .com... >>I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. > But you didn't tell us it was completely fabricated. Your information > source is suspect and that tarnishes the credibility of anything you have to > say. Sounds like Kerry... tarnished and suspect. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Joe English wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > >> "Joe English" <jenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote in message >> news:7d396$41841f8b$ce504822$1315@allthenewsgroups .com... > >>> I thought it was good reading, I told you it was unverified. >> But you didn't tell us it was completely fabricated. Your information >> source is suspect and that tarnishes the credibility of anything you >> have to say. >> > I learned from you That deserves a BINGO! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FAQ, un vote ? | BMPP | (French) | 88 | 04-12-2007 02:11 AM |
| Planète Bleue - Vote | loran45 | (French) | 10 | 04-12-2007 12:42 AM |
| Vote of confidence (101 uses for an Undersuit) | Dave Appleby | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:34 PM |
| Let's take a vote. | nospam@all.please.net | Divers Hangout | 2 | 03-26-2007 08:33 PM |
| vote pro or con reef fish | Bill Fright | Vacation ideas | 306 | 12-22-2006 07:49 PM |