Ya gotta Love The French

"Mike from Ottawa" <mev@tikaCANOE.ca> wrote in message
news:nda7r0len06kk47nop42tmk3ahj3t1mpqi@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:17:01 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@geemail.com> wrote:
>
> >"Mike from Ottawa" <mev@tikaCANOE.ca> wrote in message
> >news:ri47r0tg7dgutll4cou3pc9vakk8nll90e@4ax.com.. .
> >
> >> I know you love jumping on the French all the time, but I wish you'd
just
> >give it a rest and stop
> >> assuming the rest of the world is out to get you.
> >
> >Soon as the rest of the world stops blaming the US for all evil and
wrong.
>
> That's in your own head, but it drives a lot of your hate and anger.
> Too bad for you.

Drop the condescending bullshit.

I neither seek nor require any sympathy from you for any reason.

Matthias Voss wrote:

> Joe English wrote:
>
>> Mike from Ottawa wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:07:24 -0800, "Scott"
>>> <pugetsounddiver@geemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Mike from Ottawa" <mev@tikaCANOE.ca> wrote in message
>>>> news:6847r0tptlv0vacplf2ujpjihbcs2lqnp6@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> And why would the world be so enraged if the US lost its explosives?
>>>>> It would be just another screw-up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As contrasted against success', including the Canadian lack of need for
>>>> military.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Take chip off shoulder, put firmly on ground.
>>>
>>> I meant that "it would be just another screw-up" in the most general
>>> of ways and with respect to all security forces. The US has had its
>>> share of screw-ups, such as with Cat Stevens. The French have had
>>> theirs, and we've had ours. So why do you kids think the world would
>>> treat you differently if you had lost the explosives? People are just
>>> going to smile, shrug their shoulders and get on with life. Ain't no
>>> big deal.
>>>
>>> Nobody's security forces are perfect.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Mike from Ottawa
>>
>>
>> Past expereinces says you're wrong.
>
>
> That someones security forces are perfect?
>
> Prove it
>
> Matthias
>

Non, no I agree with the nobody's security is perfect. I disagree that
we handled the cat Stevens episode poorly. Sorry I was a little
ambiguous with my reply -

Joe English wrote:

> Mike from Ottawa wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:07:24 -0800, "Scott"
>> <pugetsounddiver@geemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Mike from Ottawa" <mev@tikaCANOE.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:6847r0tptlv0vacplf2ujpjihbcs2lqnp6@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>> And why would the world be so enraged if the US lost its explosives?
>>>> It would be just another screw-up.
>>>
>>>
>>> As contrasted against success', including the Canadian lack of need for
>>> military.
>>
>>
>>
>> Take chip off shoulder, put firmly on ground.
>>
>> I meant that "it would be just another screw-up" in the most general
>> of ways and with respect to all security forces. The US has had its
>> share of screw-ups, such as with Cat Stevens. The French have had
>> theirs, and we've had ours. So why do you kids think the world would
>> treat you differently if you had lost the explosives? People are just
>> going to smile, shrug their shoulders and get on with life. Ain't no
>> big deal.
>>
>> Nobody's security forces are perfect.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Mike from Ottawa
>
> Past expereinces says you're wrong.

That someones security forces are perfect?

Prove it

Matthias

I must admit that we have nicely ridiculed ourselves here.

For our next move we could play with highly enriched uranium and
plutonium. Kids love it. "Look mummy, I glow in the dark!" A bit too
heavy for a carry-on luggage, though. Or just put some anthrax or
smallpox in these mosquito sprays they use on landing.
Cheers,

Froggy

Joe English wrote:

>
>>
>
> Non, no I agree with the nobody's security is perfect. I disagree that
> we handled the cat Stevens episode poorly. Sorry I was a little
> ambiguous with my reply -

I agree that he tried to convince peoaple he is an asshole, in spite of
his music which I really liked.

I think this event is receiving more attention in the media than it merits.

I am more concerned about such like when Harry Belafonte was denied
access in an L.A. bar, or people accused Charlie Chaplin as being a
communist.

Matthias

>From: Mike from Ottawa mev@tikaCANOE.ca

> The US has had its
>share of screw-ups, such as with Cat Stevens. The French have had
>theirs, and we've had ours

But you never point out theirs or yours.

Infact you're busy defending them.

But you'll jump in any thread at America's expense whenever you can.

Your agenda, like Matthias's is and always has been clear, your envy
palpable.

I hope I get to meet you someday.

Soon.



Popeye
The only working atomic bomb platforms the
Japanese ever had were delivered via airmail.

> how do you kmow that the french have not lost 5 kg of plutonium?
You misspelled sold

Cheers,

Froggy

>From: "Froggy" hub666@hotmail.com
>Date: 12/6/2004 10:11 AM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <1102345896.784164.21580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups. com>
>
>> how do you kmow that the french have not lost 5 kg of plutonium?
>You misspelled sold
>
>Cheers,
>
>Froggy

Don't worry, we haven't found it yet.



Popeye
The only working atomic bomb platforms the
Japanese ever had were delivered via airmail.

Froggy wrote:

> I must admit that we have nicely ridiculed ourselves here.
>
> For our next move we could play with highly enriched uranium and
> plutonium. Kids love it. "Look mummy, I glow in the dark!" A bit too
> heavy for a carry-on luggage, though. Or just put some anthrax or
> smallpox in these mosquito sprays they use on landing.
> Cheers,
>
> Froggy
>

I thought for your next move an officer would lock himself up in a arms
depot with 60 ton of explosives...

--
Michael Wolf

-----

Cthulhu For President.
Why settle for the lesser evil?

remove stopspam to reply

> Do you have an cite of this or just more stupid American bashing as we
> have come to expect?

If americans kept their fucking big mouths shut, and did not export all
their warmongering, drugs, crap TV, pornography and shite films, then you
would not get 'bashed'

As you sow shall you reap