diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question

diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.

Thus spake George Cathcart <gcathcar@umd.edu> :

>sweir toronto canada wrote:
>> diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
>> Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
>> Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
>>
>
>That is so transparent. You just want to rent the movie cause you're hot
>for Mary-Kate and Ashley, but you want to be able to say you're renting
>it "for the dive scenes."
>
>Yeah, and Bill Clinton reads Playboy for the stories.
>
>gc

He buys the Braille edition.

--
dillon

Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

sweir toronto canada wrote:
> diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
> Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
> Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
>
Yes but it's probably not the type of diving you're referring to.

sweir toronto canada wrote:
> diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
> Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
> Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
>

That is so transparent. You just want to rent the movie cause you're hot
for Mary-Kate and Ashley, but you want to be able to say you're renting
it "for the dive scenes."

Yeah, and Bill Clinton reads Playboy for the stories.

gc

"George Cathcart" <gcathcar@umd.edu> wrote in message
news:dcr7do$pbi$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu...
> sweir toronto canada wrote:
> > diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
> > Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
> > Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
> >
>
> That is so transparent. You just want to rent the movie cause you're hot
> for Mary-Kate and Ashley, but you want to be able to say you're renting
> it "for the dive scenes."
>
> Yeah, and Bill Clinton reads Playboy for the stories.

And smokes cigars because he likes the flavor.

I wonder how many Cohiba's he burned...

"George Cathcart" wrote in message
news:dcr7do$pbi$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu...
> Yeah, and Bill Clinton reads Playboy for the stories.

Billy-Boy can read?

Thus spake Lembo <lembo27@gmail.com> :

>sweir toronto canada wrote:
>> diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
>> Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
>> Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
>>
>Yes but it's probably not the type of diving you're referring to.

Umh, does the phrase "16 will get you 20" mean anything?

--
dillon

Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:030820052134494720%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...
> ?
> ?
>
> One may ask why your eye is so highly trained in this area

Quick answer; I have some young nieces and nephews. I might ask why you
wouldn't notice yourself, having young daughters and all.

The real answer is I don't know. However, I was at the docs the other day
and found myself thumbing through a People mag or something like that.
There was an article about one of the twins breaking up with her boyfriend,
who was 33 IIRC. (the pervert) And next to the article was a picture of the
twin. It struck me that she looked like a little girl playing dressup.

I'm sure I don't know why those two are so popular. I always hated that
stupid sitcom they were in and I've certainly never seen any of their
movies.

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:oVhIe.107848$5V4.28137@pd7tw3no...

> "Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:030820052134494720%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...
>> ?
>> ?
>>
>> One may ask why your eye is so highly trained in this area
>
> Quick answer; I have some young nieces and nephews. I might ask why you
> wouldn't notice yourself, having young daughters and all.

That's a damn good question.

In article <GNgIe.110443$s54.970@pd7tw2no>, chilly
<slarson@shaw.canada> wrote:

€ "Dillon Pyron" <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
€ news:ktl2f191c2smpce4k6ivp08gq5ddr0rmu4@4ax.com...
€ > Thus spake Lembo <lembo27@gmail.com> :
€ >
€ > >sweir toronto canada wrote:
€ > >> diver with too much time on his hands asks an important (not) question.
€ > >> Are there any dive scenes in the 1996 The Adventures of Mary-Kate &
€ > >> Ashley: The Case of the Shark Encounter.
€ > >>
€ > >Yes but it's probably not the type of diving you're referring to.
€ >
€ > Umh, does the phrase "16 will get you 20" mean anything?
€
€ I think the twins are over 18 now. To my eye, they still look quite
€ underage though.
€
€
€

One may ask why your eye is so highly trained in this area