Gotta Love The Brits

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5


"Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when
he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness
and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~

Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:137eg9gqe4nrr37@news.supernews.com...
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5

why and your point is what?

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46774831$0$22443$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
> message news:137eg9gqe4nrr37@news.supernews.com...
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5
>
> why and your point is what?

Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
desperate you are to get back on topic.



--
> So which one will you ban and confiscate?

I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch
there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're
in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my
concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of
firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often
called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers
another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip>

> >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean.

> > Did I say I would confiscate them?

> Yes, several times.

Delusion. -JOF


"Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when
he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness
and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~

Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:137ej6j67bto97@news.supernews.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46774831$0$22443$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>> message news:137eg9gqe4nrr37@news.supernews.com...
>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5
>>
>> why and your point is what?
>
> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
> desperate you are to get back on topic.

so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
posts. NOT

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46775035$0$22425$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
> message news:137ej6j67bto97@news.supernews.com...
>> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:46774831$0$22443$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>
>>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
>>> in message news:137eg9gqe4nrr37@news.supernews.com...

>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5
>>>
>>> why and your point is what?
>>
>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
>> desperate you are to get back on topic.
>
> so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
> posts. NOT

No need to get your panties knotted.

But you sure do keep answering them.

Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who?

--
> So which one will you ban and confiscate?

I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch
there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're
in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my
concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of
firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often
called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers
another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip>

> >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean.

> > Did I say I would confiscate them?

> Yes, several times.

Delusion. -JOF


"Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when
he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness
and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~

Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:137ekhlb6ubcm49@news.supernews.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46775035$0$22425$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>> message news:137ej6j67bto97@news.supernews.com...
>>> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:46774831$0$22443$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>>
>>>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
>>>> in message news:137eg9gqe4nrr37@news.supernews.com...
>
>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...id=181 1&ct=5
>>>>
>>>> why and your point is what?
>>>
>>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
>>> desperate you are to get back on topic.
>>
>> so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
>> posts. NOT
>
> No need to get your panties knotted.

I'm not wearing any that should excite you

>
> But you sure do keep answering them.

just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about

>
> Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who?

Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46775418$0$22435$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>>>>> why and your point is what?
>>>>
>>>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
>>>> desperate you are to get back on topic.
>>>
>>> so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
>>> posts. NOT
>>
>> No need to get your panties knotted.
>
> I'm not wearing any that should excite you

I'm not a "show me yours" Aussie trucker.

>> But you sure do keep answering them.
>
> just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about

You sure you have a funny way of putting a stop to these "prattish" OT
posts.

Sounds like you were porking a pie.

Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon.

>> Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who?
>
> Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov

No, the original post has its own point, not mine.

Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one.

In fact, the converse is more likely true.

Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:137em1rj43k4lee@news.supernews.com...
> "dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46775418$0$22435$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
>>>>>> why and your point is what?
>>>>>
>>>>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
>>>>> desperate you are to get back on topic.
>>>>
>>>> so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
>>>> posts. NOT
>>>
>>> No need to get your panties knotted.
>>
>> I'm not wearing any that should excite you
>
> I'm not a "show me yours" Aussie trucker.

we know that your a "show me yours" Yankee trucker who travels to Canada for
some back channelling
..
>
>>> But you sure do keep answering them.
>>
>> just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about
>
> You sure you have a funny way of putting a stop to these "prattish" OT
> posts.

why should I?

>
> Sounds like you were porking a pie.

so that was you in American Pie was it?

>
> Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon.
>
>>> Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who?
>>
>> Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov
>
> No, the original post has its own point, not mine.

which is what? come on explain

>
> Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one.
>
> In fact, the converse is more likely true.
>
> Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time.
>

Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...181 1&ct=5God bless them, every one.> "This is an occasion for the world's 1.5 billion Muslims to look at theseriousness of this decision," said Mohammed Ijaz ul-Haq,> Pakistan's religious affairs minister. "The West is accusing Muslims ofextremism and terrorism," he told his country's parliament.> "If someone exploded a bomb on his body he would be right to do so, unlessthe British government apologizes and withdraws> the 'sir' title."Bang. Problem resolved.> The parliament in Islamabad - supposedly a key ally in the war on terror -then backed a government-sponsored motion> demanding an apology and the withdrawal of the honor from the The SatanicVerses author.Imagine that. The guy that just supported exploding a bomb on the body of aBritish knight, to his parliament no less, is complaining about hisreligion being accused of extremism and terrorism. Talk about proving thepoint. It would be hard to have done so more quickly, completely anddecisively.Bang again, just in case the first shot only wounded him.Lee

"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:467759b5$0$22408$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in

>>>>>> Listen, I'd answer this painfully obvious question, but I know how
>>>>>> desperate you are to get back on topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> so you can'/won't make a point? Looking forward to more of your random
>>>>> posts. NOT
>>>>
>>>> No need to get your panties knotted.
>>>
>>> I'm not wearing any that should excite you
>>
>> I'm not a "show me yours" Aussie trucker.
>
> we know that your a "show me yours" Yankee trucker who travels to Canada
> for some back channelling

I'm not the one playing porkie pie patty cake with carl nisrael.

>>>> But you sure do keep answering them.
>>>
>>> just trying to figure out wtf u r going on about
>>
>> You sure you have a funny way of putting a stop to these "prattish" OT
>> posts.
>
> why should I?

Well, you've only stated 5 times that it's the purpose of your inquiries.

I certainly didn't think it was, but now you've confirmed it.

Looks like you told another FJF whopper.

>> Sounds like you were porking a pie.
>
> so that was you in American Pie was it?

You're the pie porker, mate.

>> Try dialing 1-800-usenetanon.
>>
>>>> Tell me and Futile again, who was it that was reeling in who?
>>>
>>> Oh so your original post was a troll and you had no pov
>>
>> No, the original post has its own point, not mine.
>
> which is what? come on explain

Tell you what.

Why don't -you- give us your opinion of the Brits Knighting Salman
Rushdie.

But is sure does seem like you're dragging out these off-topic posts you
said you were trying to end.

>> Just because -you- don't get it, doesn't mean there isn't one.
>>
>> In fact, the converse is more likely true.
>>
>> Ask Futile John, he's in that predicament all the time.
>>
>
>



--
> So which one will you ban and confiscate?

I don't know much about the different guns but based on the tv I watch
there are lots of automatic weapons out there. In fact I'm sure they're
in the majority, certainly in the handgun department. I guess my
concern would be with the more easily concealed weapons capable of
firing sustained bursts at extreme cycling rates. I think they're often
called full auto, but it seems to me that any weapon that chambers
another round automatically should probably be called an automatic. <snip>

> >> Since you intend to confiscate them, I'm sure you know what I mean.

> > Did I say I would confiscate them?

> Yes, several times.

Delusion. -JOF


"Life is too short to be little. Man is never so manly as when
he feels deeply, acts boldly, and expresses himself with frankness
and with fervor." ~Benjamin Disraeli~

Popeye/ www.finalprotectivefire.com