Re: M,I-5 Persecut ion , bu gging a nd count er-surveillance

imfeviv@hotmail.com wrote in news:bo0800010855111596@4ax.com:

> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -= MI5:. bugging and counter-surveillance -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why. not ?
> I mean if PO: >I thought. that was happening to me, I'd search the
> place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know if
> anything was out of place.. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would
> call. in one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have. those
> machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This PO: >reminds
> me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1. on
>
> That's exactly what we did. We went to a competent,. professional
> detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to debug our
> house. They. used scanner devices which go to over 1 GHz and would.
> pick up any nearby transmitter in that range, they also checked the.
> phones and found nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange,. then
> they wouldn't find anything, would. they?
>
> CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs. to
> be found?
>
> You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other. people
> in more "serious" cases, where. they would know the targets would
> suspect the presence of electronic surveillance.. So they will have
> developed techniques and devices which are not readily detectable.
> either by visual inspection or by electronic means. What those
> techniques might be, I couldn't. guess.
>
> In this case, the existence of bugging devices was. clear from the
> beginning, and they "rubbed it in". with what was said by the boy on
> the coach. It was almost as. if they wanted counter-surveillance
> people to be called in, who they knew would fail to. detect the
> bugging devices, causing loss of credibility. to the other things I
> would have to say relating to the harassment.
>
> I did. all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find
> the bugs. In. addition to calling in professional help using
> electronic counter-surveillance, I made a. close visual inspection of
> electrical equipment, plus any points where audio or video
> surveillance. devices might have. been concealed. Of course, I found
> nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras". are quite noticeable and
> require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best place to
> put a small video. surveillance device would be additional to. a piece
> of electronic equipment such as a TV or video. It would be necessary
> to physically break in to a property to. fit such. a device.
>
> 2985
>
>

How many cocks did you suck tonight?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com