Re: Disturbing Post About Muslims

On Jan 5, 8:55 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I got this from a friend. As an American, at the very least, I find it
> troubling both because it conflicts with my personal beliefs and because, it
> appears to be based on fact. I am unable to reconcile the two issues. I
> present it without agreeing or disagreeing, for discussion as others choose.
>
> Lee

1) You posted it because you agree with it.
2) You're stupid enough to believe it, just like you believed that
stupid gun myth about the 11-year old girl shooting two Hispanics
trying to break into her house.

You're a fuckin' gullible clown, Lee.

<nisarel@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:530bd22a-994b-4a57-8c9b-d51a6cbc2fe1@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 5, 8:55 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> I got this from a friend. As an American, at the very least, I find it
>> troubling both because it conflicts with my personal beliefs and because,
>> it
>> appears to be based on fact. I am unable to reconcile the two issues. I
>> present it without agreeing or disagreeing, for discussion as others
>> choose.
>>
>> Lee
>
> 1) You posted it because you agree with it.
> 2) You're stupid enough to believe it, just like you believed that
> stupid gun myth about the 11-year old girl shooting two Hispanics
> trying to break into her house.
>
> You're a fuckin' gullible clown, Lee.

I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.

You interpret that to mean I agree with it.

I sat it appears to be based on fact.

You call me gullible, but offer not a single word to indicate that it's not
factual.

I say I neither agree or disagree.

You claim that means I agree.

You're a liar, an idiot, or both. The only gullible people in this
discussion are those that believe anything you have to say.

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:25:13 -0500, "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

><nisarel@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:530bd22a-994b-4a57-8c9b-d51a6cbc2fe1@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 5, 8:55 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> I got this from a friend. As an American, at the very least, I find it
>>> troubling both because it conflicts with my personal beliefs and because,
>>> it
>>> appears to be based on fact. I am unable to reconcile the two issues. I
>>> present it without agreeing or disagreeing, for discussion as others
>>> choose.
>>>
>>> Lee
>>
>> 1) You posted it because you agree with it.
>> 2) You're stupid enough to believe it, just like you believed that
>> stupid gun myth about the 11-year old girl shooting two Hispanics
>> trying to break into her house.
>>
>> You're a fuckin' gullible clown, Lee.
>
>I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.
>
>You interpret that to mean I agree with it.
>
>I sat it appears to be based on fact.

Based on exactly nothing you cite.

>
>You call me gullible, but offer not a single word to indicate that it's not
>factual.

You haven't offered a single word to indicate that it's factual
either.

>
>I say I neither agree or disagree.
>
>You claim that means I agree.

Why wouldn't someone think that? You're the one who said it disturbs
you without saying why other than some ridiculous claim that it
"appears" to be factual. On Halloween, children appear to be ghosts.
Does that disturb you too?

On Jan 7, 8:25 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> <nisa...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > On Jan 5, 8:55 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> I got this from a friend. As an American, at the very least, I find it
> >> troubling both because it conflicts with my personal beliefs and because,
> >> it
> >> appears to be based on fact. I am unable to reconcile the two issues. I
> >> present it without agreeing or disagreeing, for discussion as others
> >> choose.
>
> >> Lee
>
> > 1) You posted it because you agree with it.
> > 2) You're stupid enough to believe it, just like you believed that
> > stupid gun myth about the 11-year old girl shooting two Hispanics
> > trying to break into her house.
>
> > You're a fuckin' gullible clown, Lee.
>
> I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.

You mean it conflicts with your ignorant personal biases.

> You interpret that to mean I agree with it.

You do. You're just playing games trying to pretend that you don't.

> I sat it appears to be based on fact.

Only because you're a gullible moron.

> You call me gullible, but offer not a single word to indicate that it's not
> factual.

Your immediate acceptance of the 11-year old Montana girl gunhugger
myth demonstrates that you are a gullible fool who believe the crap he
finds on the internet.

> You haven't offered a single word to indicate that it's factual
> either.

I don't have to. I posted the original article, offering it for comment.
You're the ones claiming it's racist without an ounce of support.

> Why wouldn't someone think that?

Because it's exactly the opposite of what I said?

You apparently have no basis for your opinion except your desire for the
information to be untrue. It's a shame. I would have preferred to have
someone actually show where it is false. It's pretty obvious it's not going
to be you.

Lee

nisarel@gmail.com wrote

>> I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.
>
> You mean it conflicts with your ignorant personal biases.

That would be my bias for freedom of religion. I can understand that you
think that's an ignorant personal bias, but it's kind of essential to the
essence of my country.

>> You interpret that to mean I agree with it.
>
> You do. You're just playing games trying to pretend that you don't.

Check. I keep saying otherwise to fool you. Could not possibly be that I
mean what I say.

>> I sat it appears to be based on fact.
>
> Only because you're a gullible moron.

I'm still waiting for you to point out something wrong. Do you have
something to say or are you just running off at the keyboard because you
can?

In article <532b9b87-4ff9-4c25-85c1-8c7e07989483
@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, nisarel@gmail.com says...
-On Jan 7, 8:25 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
-> <nisa...@gmail.com> wrote in message


-> I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.
-
-You mean it conflicts with your ignorant personal biases.

carLito, congrats on your achievement.

you are the loudest most ignorant most obnoxious
ranting jerk in the whole usenet.

you sound like one of the losers that hide in NY.





--
Bob Crownfield
crownfield@verizon.net

"crownfield" <crownfield@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.21ec73e8827d5500989777@news.verizon.net.. .
> In article <532b9b87-4ff9-4c25-85c1-8c7e07989483
> @j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, nisarel@gmail.com says...
> -On Jan 7, 8:25 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> -> <nisa...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>
> -> I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal
beliefs.
> -
> -You mean it conflicts with your ignorant personal biases.
>
> carLito, congrats on your achievement.
>
> you are the loudest most ignorant most obnoxious
> ranting jerk in the whole usenet.

I object.

That guy that posts the MI5 posts incessantly is the most ranting guy in the
whole usenet.

John Kulp wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:25:13 -0500, "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>><nisarel@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:530bd22a-994b-4a57-8c9b-d51a6cbc2fe1@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>On Jan 5, 8:55 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I got this from a friend. As an American, at the very least, I find it
>>>>troubling both because it conflicts with my personal beliefs and because,
>>>>it
>>>>appears to be based on fact. I am unable to reconcile the two issues. I
>>>>present it without agreeing or disagreeing, for discussion as others
>>>>choose.
>>>>
>>>>Lee
>>>
>>>1) You posted it because you agree with it.
>>>2) You're stupid enough to believe it, just like you believed that
>>>stupid gun myth about the 11-year old girl shooting two Hispanics
>>>trying to break into her house.
>>>
>>>You're a fuckin' gullible clown, Lee.
>>
>>I say I find it troubling because it conflicts with my personal beliefs.
>>
>>You interpret that to mean I agree with it.
>>
>>I sat it appears to be based on fact.
>
>
> Based on exactly nothing you cite.
>
>
>>You call me gullible, but offer not a single word to indicate that it's not
>>factual.
>
>
> You haven't offered a single word to indicate that it's factual
> either.
>
>
>>I say I neither agree or disagree.
>>
>>You claim that means I agree.
>
>
> Why wouldn't someone think that? You're the one who said it disturbs
> you without saying why other than some ridiculous claim that it
> "appears" to be factual. On Halloween, children appear to be ghosts.
> Does that disturb you too?

no, but clowns do
>
>

On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:39:25 -0600, Joe English
<joe2aenglish@wisperhome.com> wrote:


>>
>> Why wouldn't someone think that? You're the one who said it disturbs
>> you without saying why other than some ridiculous claim that it
>> "appears" to be factual. On Halloween, children appear to be ghosts.
>> Does that disturb you too?
>
>no, but clowns do
>>
>>

Looking into the mirror?