Trip Report: Kauai

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:70393$435fc85d$18d64cf6$28269@KNOLOGY.NET...

> > Well, you're in luck. I'm just so D@MN happy about these pending
> > indictments that I'm not going to ride your hypocrite @ss today.

You really need to read Loius Freeh's book.

> Not that you'll see this, since I'm in our killfile & all, but I'm just
> tickled that you now realize that obstruction of justice and perjury are
> serious offenses.
> You seemd to have such a different opinion in 2000.
>
> Only two more days to get the indictments though.

Forget all that "innocent until proven guilty" shit the left likes to act
like they alone persue.

Indicted doesnt mean a thing.

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:43:10 GMT, "Suds \(Popeye's friend\)"
<walkthetalk@blowhard.com> wrote:

>
>"Doug Frederick" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message
>news:11luhjbs6ppca14@news.supernews.com...
>>
>You're still here?!
>
>Well, you're in luck. I'm just so D@MN happy about these pending
>indictments that I'm not going to ride your hypocrite @ss today.
>
>>
>> Make sure you two send pictures.
>>
>
>You got anymore pictures from the road to share. My kids are missing snow.
>I'd send them to Grandma's house for Xmas but Matty is still to young to fly
>alone.
>
>You take care of yourself. I still want you alive when the impeach shrub.
>
>
>Your Loving Pal
>
>
>suds
>
>
Hiya suds, I'm gonna look you up this time, the wife and I are coming
back to Maui in January...it's been 2 years and I miss the guys over
at Ed Robinson's... So I'm going to look you up and introduce myself
to ya

Moyo

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f5mdnU0-m7oPecLeRVn-hg@wavecable.com...
> "Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
> news:70393$435fc85d$18d64cf6$28269@KNOLOGY.NET...
>
> > > Well, you're in luck. I'm just so D@MN happy about these pending
> > > indictments that I'm not going to ride your hypocrite @ss today.
>
> You really need to read Loius Freeh's book.
>
> > Not that you'll see this, since I'm in our killfile & all, but I'm just
> > tickled that you now realize that obstruction of justice and perjury are
> > serious offenses.
> > You seemd to have such a different opinion in 2000.
> >
> > Only two more days to get the indictments though.
>
> Forget all that "innocent until proven guilty" shit the left likes to act
> like they alone persue.
>
> Indicted doesnt mean a thing.
>
>

To Democrats, it means a lot.
a) if the indicted person is a Republican, it means they're guilty - guilty
guilty guilty!
b) if the indicted person is a Democrat, or sympathwetic to Democrat causes,
it means they'rte the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
c) if the indicted person is apolitical - just yer basic crook, then it
means its a further victimization of the person by our oppressive society.
The root causes must be determined, and understanding achieved. Then, then
the crook would become a nice person.

Dennis

"Galen Hekhuis" <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:7o2tl1diqqo5b53lcf3cck5injgugnjinf@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:37:37 -0700, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Grumman-581" <grumman(five)(eight)(one)@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:z_u7f.26863$GQ.12622@tornado.texas.rr.com.. .
>
>>..
>>> "kph"? kilometers per hour? Whatcha doin', going metric on us? Hell,
>>> I
>>> though Hawaii was supposed to be part of the US...
>>
>>I thought a knothead like you would understand knots.
>>...
>
> Isn't "knots" in reference to "nautical miles per hour" usually
> abbreviated as kn or kt? Anyway, a reference to knots per hour would be
> sort of like saying rpm per minute. Strictly speaking, a "knot" is a unit
> of speed, a nautical mile is the measure of distance. I don't think I've
> ever seen knots as "kph."
>
>
Oops, shoulda checked the timestamp before responding.

LD.

"Limey" wrote in message
news:Iyt8f.518008$5N3.216290@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Oops, shoulda checked the timestamp before responding.

You're still recovering from your quickie with Wilma... It's
understandable...

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:1a067$43603c44$18d64cf6$6721@KNOLOGY.NET...

> To Democrats, it means a lot.
> a) if the indicted person is a Republican, it means they're guilty -
guilty
> guilty guilty!
> b) if the indicted person is a Democrat, or sympathwetic to Democrat
causes,
> it means they'rte the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
> c) if the indicted person is apolitical - just yer basic crook, then it
> means its a further victimization of the person by our oppressive society.
> The root causes must be determined, and understanding achieved. Then, then
> the crook would become a nice person.

Yeah, look how tore up they are;

http://www.zombietime.com/2000_iraq_deaths_party/

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Cq-dnQT1rb0LdP_eRVn-ow@wavecable.com...
>
> "Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
> news:1a067$43603c44$18d64cf6$6721@KNOLOGY.NET...
>
>> To Democrats, it means a lot.
>> a) if the indicted person is a Republican, it means they're guilty -
> guilty
>> guilty guilty!
>> b) if the indicted person is a Democrat, or sympathwetic to Democrat
> causes,
>> it means they'rte the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
>> c) if the indicted person is apolitical - just yer basic crook, then it
>> means its a further victimization of the person by our oppressive
>> society.
>> The root causes must be determined, and understanding achieved. Then,
>> then
>> the crook would become a nice person.
>
> Yeah, look how tore up they are;
>
> http://www.zombietime.com/2000_iraq_deaths_party/

Perhaps they were excited that the truth about the ridiculous Iraq invasion
is finally coming to roost. Me, I celebrated hard today knowing that
Scooter is finally getting his just deserts. Hopefully Rove will soon
follow. It's too bad that Fitzgerald is merely a bipartisan investigator.
God knows what they could have drug up if only they had a $40 million biased
prosecutor like Ken Starr. I was waiting for him to question the entire
executive branch about their sexual proclivities, but I guess that's only
reserved for Republicans to ask of Democrats.

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:JWt8f.25559$Bf7.21561@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> "Limey" wrote in message
> news:Iyt8f.518008$5N3.216290@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> Oops, shoulda checked the timestamp before responding.
>
> You're still recovering from your quickie with Wilma... It's
> understandable...
>
>
Yup, I'm still a little punchy, and waaay behind in my reading.

LD.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:11m6fbehh6vr3d9@corp.supernews.com...
> "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Cq-dnQT1rb0LdP_eRVn-ow@wavecable.com...
> >
> > "Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:1a067$43603c44$18d64cf6$6721@KNOLOGY.NET...
> >
> >> To Democrats, it means a lot.
> >> a) if the indicted person is a Republican, it means they're guilty -
> > guilty
> >> guilty guilty!
> >> b) if the indicted person is a Democrat, or sympathwetic to Democrat
> > causes,
> >> it means they'rte the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.
> >> c) if the indicted person is apolitical - just yer basic crook, then it
> >> means its a further victimization of the person by our oppressive
> >> society.
> >> The root causes must be determined, and understanding achieved. Then,
> >> then
> >> the crook would become a nice person.
> >
> > Yeah, look how tore up they are;
> >
> > http://www.zombietime.com/2000_iraq_deaths_party/
>
> Perhaps they were excited that the truth about the ridiculous Iraq
invasion
> is finally coming to roost. Me, I celebrated hard today knowing that
> Scooter is finally getting his just deserts. Hopefully Rove will soon
> follow. It's too bad that Fitzgerald is merely a bipartisan investigator.
> God knows what they could have drug up if only they had a $40 million
biased
> prosecutor like Ken Starr. I was waiting for him to question the entire
> executive branch about their sexual proclivities, but I guess that's only
> reserved for Republicans to ask of Democrats.
>
>

Remember that Janet Reno gave approval for the investigation to include the
paula jones harrassment claims.
Let me guess, she's part of the VRWC too.


And, currently, there's no reason to ask.

Dennis

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:cc17b$4363acba$18d64cf6$29877@KNOLOGY.NET...

> Remember that Janet Reno gave approval for the investigation to include
> the
> paula jones harrassment claims.
> Let me guess, she's part of the VRWC too.

Fortunately it was just Reno. Had Gonzales been AG at the time, he would
have approved torture.