OT: For the lawyers

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3603670.html

"The ruling so outraged eminent domain foes across the country that they
decided to get even. Invoking the same premise used by the Supreme Court -
that businesses will generate higher incomes for communities than individual
landowners - they want to turn Souter's 200-year-old farmhouse into an inn
to be known as the Lost Liberty Hotel."

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xvidnbp4YP9bM07enZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@wavecable.co m...
> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/3603670.html

<quote>
Neal Kurk, who represents Weare in the statehouse, said he and "a lot of
other people in town" were troubled by the idea of subjecting a Supreme
Court Justice to the consequences of one of his own decisions. "It's almost
as if they are trying to intimidate judges," said Kurk, a Republican.
</quote>

Yeah, we can't have Supreme Court Justices subject to the consequences of
their decisions, can we? <snicker>