A clear example of the bad effects of the Republicans.

Greg Mossman wrote:
> "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:oz0Pf.3918$l7.2339@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>> "Dillon Pyron" wrote
>>
>>> Straight to alt.humor.best-of-usenet
>> I figured it would get a smile here, but I have to admit that it's not a
>> Lee Bell original. It was sent to me earlier today. I have no idea who
>> originated it.
>
> Hmmmm. What have we learned about copyright law?
>
> But it was funny. One of the dopiest things the Bush adminstration has done
> (twice if you count daddy) was leave Saddam alive to become a martyr. When
> they found him in the hole, they should have "disappeared" him right quick.

but greg, that would be illegal.

>

Of course, you're too fuckin' stupid to realize that Saddam had nothing
to do with 9/11.

You and your buddies are paying out of the nose for Bush's folly in
Iraq. You're less safe than you were 6 years ago but you're too butt
ignorant and blind to see what's happening.

The Bushites are doing anything they can to insure that a Repug is in
the White House in 2008.

They are taking away your rights.

They are listening to your phone calls.

They are spending the country into bankruptcy.

Fuckwits like you deserve the morass of a country that Bush has created
for you.

Greg Mossman wrote:
> "Joe English" <joeenglish2@wisperhome.com> wrote in message
> news:440cd727$0$52052$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster. com...
>
>
>>>But it was funny. One of the dopiest things the Bush adminstration has
>>>done (twice if you count daddy) was leave Saddam alive to become a
>>>martyr. When they found him in the hole, they should have "disappeared"
>>>him right quick. All he's doing nowadays is motivating the Sunni
>>>"insurgency" just like Bin Laden, whom Bush left alive to appease his
>>>buddies in the Bin Laden family, is still a major thorn in the "War" on
>>>terror.
>>
>>He left Bin LAden Alive???? How so?? I thought that was Clinton
>
>
> He's dead?
>
>
>
one could only wish! Who left Bin Laden Alive - that would be Clinton

>> They are listening to your phone calls.

> If you're making overseas calls to al Queda they are.

The NSA is listening to purely domestic phone calls that have no direct
connection with foreign terrorists.

<nisarel@postmaster.co.uk> wrote

>> If you're making overseas calls to al Queda they are.

> The NSA is listening to purely domestic phone calls that have no direct
> connection with foreign terrorists.

They called and told you this?

Lee

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:4c36a$440d1383$18d64cf6$25498@KNOLOGY.NET...

>> But it was funny. One of the dopiest things the Bush adminstration has
> done
>> (twice if you count daddy) was leave Saddam alive to become a martyr.
> When
>
> As opposed to killing him, so he wouldn't become a martyr?

As opposed to "disappearing" him, so no one would know either way. His
people would have thought he ran away to hide in exile and he would have
been disgraced. We could have killed him and obliterated the remains, or
else stuck him in our of our secret Romanian prisons. Instead, he now
serves to incite the Sunni faction who still hold out a belief that they can
return to the happy days prior to the U.S. invasion.

>> they found him in the hole, they should have "disappeared" him right

Thus spake "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> :

><nisarel@postmaster.co.uk> wrote
>
>>> If you're making overseas calls to al Queda they are.
>
>> The NSA is listening to purely domestic phone calls that have no direct
>> connection with foreign terrorists.
>
>They called and told you this?

The NSA cannot, by law, listen to purely domestic communications. I
know this from very personal experience.

>
>Lee
>
--
dillon

Could have been is in the past
Could be is in the future
There is only the now

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xDHPf.67$e6.19@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> "Dillon Pyron" wrote
>
>>><nisarel@postmaster.co.uk> wrote
>>>
>>>>> If you're making overseas calls to al Queda they are.
>>>
>>>> The NSA is listening to purely domestic phone calls that have no direct
>>>> connection with foreign terrorists.
>>>
>>>They called and told you this?
>>
>> The NSA cannot, by law, listen to purely domestic communications. I
>> know this from very personal experience.
>
> Personally, I think Carl's as full of shit as the Christmas turkey, but I
> have doubts about what may be going on as well. There seems to be quite a
> few things that the government can't do legally, that they're doing
> anyway. It's making even some of us conservatives a bit nervous.

But illegally, they'll do it anyway.

"They" have been for decades.

No one can stop them.

Hardly anyone can catch them.

If I hear you tell your brother you're going to rob a bank, I don't want
or need the tape as evidence.

I just go wait at the bank.

Or invest the illegal information in an "anonymous tip".

Cops do it all the time.

They couldn't then, or now, use the information legally, except -maybe- in
this most recent episode.

Or keep you and I from listening in on each other.

You can buy the entry level stuff at Wal Mart, and spend as much as you
want to legally buy better.

It's much ado about -nothing-.

Unless you're suds sending blocks of (your wife's hard earned) cash to the
Iraqi Insurgent's Fund.

>
> Lee
>

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:120tu50s2l3n34b@corp.supernews.com...
> "Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4c36a$440d1383$18d64cf6$25498@KNOLOGY.NET...
>
> >> But it was funny. One of the dopiest things the Bush adminstration has
> > done
> >> (twice if you count daddy) was leave Saddam alive to become a martyr.
> > When
> >
> > As opposed to killing him, so he wouldn't become a martyr?
>
> As opposed to "disappearing" him, so no one would know either way. His
> people would have thought he ran away to hide in exile and he would have
> been disgraced. We could have killed him and obliterated the remains, or
> else stuck him in our of our secret Romanian prisons. Instead, he now
> serves to incite the Sunni faction who still hold out a belief that they
can
> return to the happy days prior to the U.S. invasion.
>
> >> they found him in the hole, they should have "disappeared" him right
>
>
>

So you think the Sunni insurgency would not be inspired by the thought of
Saddam roaming free, defying the infidels?
Oh please.

Dennis

"Popeye" wrote

>> I have doubts about what may be going on as well. There seems to be
>> quite a few things that the government can't do legally, that they're
>> doing anyway. It's making even some of us conservatives a bit nervous.

> But illegally, they'll do it anyway. "They" have been for decades. No
> one can stop them.

Certainly true, but either they used to be better at it, or they're doing so
much more of it that they're getting caught more often. I'm a lot more
concerned with their "ends justify the means" attitude when caught than I am
with the crime itself. Just as Clinton's lying to Congress was a much more
serious problem than what he was lying about, their claiming that it was OK
to violate privacy laws is worse than the violations they intentionally
committed.

Perhaps we should forgive the trespass, but we should not condone it, no
matter where we are on the line between rabid liberal and rabid
conservative.

Lee