Happy Fathers Day

All us poor bastards.

http://www.timesrecordnews.com/trn/l...756054,00.html

The mom sounds classy. Has she been cashing the support checks for the last
11 years?

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:nomdnV7Iuv6bKgjZnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@wavecable.co m...
> All us poor bastards.
>
> http://www.timesrecordnews.com/trn/l...756054,00.html
>
>

"Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MGxlg.25543$VE1.17662@newssvr14.news.prodigy. com...
> "Stagger Lee" <ProcambarusREMOVE.c@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ltplg.57780$9c6.56962@dukeread11...
> > The mom sounds classy. Has she been cashing the support checks for the
> last
> > 11 years?
>
> I'd guess that she never received the checks. I'd guess that either the
> California agency stopped the outgoing side and just neglected to stop the
> incoming side or the outgoing checks were redirected to an employees
account
> because "the parents would never know".
>
> Damn, I'm cynical sometimes.

I hope he gets a lawyer with fangs and guts them.

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ZoqdnZtXItDIJQvZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@wavecable.co m...
>
> "Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MGxlg.25543$VE1.17662@newssvr14.news.prodigy. com...
> > "Stagger Lee" <ProcambarusREMOVE.c@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ltplg.57780$9c6.56962@dukeread11...
> > > The mom sounds classy. Has she been cashing the support checks for
the
> > last
> > > 11 years?
> >
> > I'd guess that she never received the checks. I'd guess that either the
> > California agency stopped the outgoing side and just neglected to stop
the
> > incoming side or the outgoing checks were redirected to an employees
> account
> > because "the parents would never know".
> >
> > Damn, I'm cynical sometimes.
>
> I hope he gets a lawyer with fangs and guts them.

He's already made at least one smart move by not accepting the $2000 offered
by the California agency. It didn't say if he had cashed the check from
Texas or not. I'd guess probably not. I wouldn't.

Scott wrote:

> All us poor bastards.
>
> http://www.timesrecordnews.com/trn/l...756054,00.html

Like the dad said, they had no problem finding him and collecting money
for his daughter who was deceased. The system not only sucks there, but
here in NY also.

I hope he nails them all to the wall, starting with Family Court in both
states and his dopey ex-girlfriend.

The money went somewhere. And I am sure that he is owed a LOT more.

"TonyP" wrote

> I hope he nails them all to the wall, starting with Family Court in both
> states and his dopey ex-girlfriend.

> The money went somewhere. And I am sure that he is owed a LOT more.

The cool thing is, since the state intervened, they're probably responsible
for principal and interest even if the wife can't cough up the dough.

Lee

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:8ZGlg.67480$qd2.42155@bignews6.bellsouth.net. ..
> "TonyP" wrote
>
> > I hope he nails them all to the wall, starting with Family Court in both
> > states and his dopey ex-girlfriend.
>
> > The money went somewhere. And I am sure that he is owed a LOT more.
>
> The cool thing is, since the state intervened, they're probably
responsible
> for principal and interest even if the wife can't cough up the dough.

Damn straight.

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:8ZGlg.67480$qd2.42155@bignews6.bellsouth.net. ..
> "TonyP" wrote
>
> > I hope he nails them all to the wall, starting with Family Court in both
> > states and his dopey ex-girlfriend.
>
> > The money went somewhere. And I am sure that he is owed a LOT more.
>
> The cool thing is, since the state intervened, they're probably
responsible
> for principal and interest even if the wife can't cough up the dough.
>
> Lee

I'd like to point out that there is still the possibility that the wife
didn't receive the money.

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:30:12 GMT, "Chris Guynn"
<chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to point out that there is still the possibility that the wife
> didn't receive the money.

Since the government was involved, it might very well be a case of
"don't attibute to malice what can adequately be described by
incompetence"...

Chris Guynn wrote

> I'd like to point out that there is still the possibility that the wife
> didn't receive the money.

Yes, but as a twice divorced man, I prefer to think the worst of her.

Actually, the point was that the guy is likely to get his money back plus
interest because the state forced him to pay it to them. Whether the wife
got it, or if she did, has it, the state is still on the hook.

Lee