Some people say that there's no such thing...

as global warning.

Well, look at this and tell me what you think.

http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
advertising)

Chris Guynn wrote:
> as global warning.
>
> Well, look at this and tell me what you think.
>
> http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
> advertising)
>
>
>
Of course there's global warming. Here on the Boynton Reefs you
can see the effects of the last eighty feet of sea rise.

The PROBLEM with global warming is that it's starting to
encroach on the Kennedy's and Gore's beachfront property.

Nothing pisses off a Democrat like encroachment on his private
beach!

"Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Mjeog.109449$H71.85322@newssvr13.news.prodigy .com...

> as global warning.
>
> Well, look at this and tell me what you think.
>
> http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
> advertising)

Foorp if there ever was.

Thus spake "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> :

>
>"mike gray" <omgray@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:9Pfog.66261$mF2.34732@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> Chris Guynn wrote:
>> > as global warning.
>> >
>> > Well, look at this and tell me what you think.
>> >
>> > http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
>> > advertising)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Of course there's global warming. Here on the Boynton Reefs you
>> can see the effects of the last eighty feet of sea rise.
>>
>> The PROBLEM with global warming is that it's starting to
>> encroach on the Kennedy's and Gore's beachfront property.
>>
>> Nothing pisses off a Democrat like encroachment on his private
>> beach!
>
>'Cept windmills...
>

I guess I should have followed the thread.
--
dillon

JAFO

FWIW, this should cut through the bullshit on the subject.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597

and further:

http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002545.html

Assuming the receptacle of information has a basic science background. The
general population hasn't any knowledge of what DNA is, what it does, and
how it pertains to laws to be voted on. How would one expect the general
population to understand global warming?

George


"Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Mjeog.109449$H71.85322@newssvr13.news.prodigy .com...
> as global warning.
>
> Well, look at this and tell me what you think.
>
> http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
> advertising)
>
>

"George Price" <gprice3@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:QL1qg.26853$LT2.18650@tornado.tampabay.rr.com ...
> FWIW, this should cut through the bullshit on the subject.
>
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
>
> and further:
>
> http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002545.html
>
> Assuming the receptacle of information has a basic science background.
The
> general population hasn't any knowledge of what DNA is, what it does, and
> how it pertains to laws to be voted on. How would one expect the general
> population to understand global warming?
>
> George

uhhh... did you follow my link? If not, you should. Not because I'm trying
to prove you wrong (or right for that matter), but just because... well...
follow it and you'll see.

>
>
> "Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Mjeog.109449$H71.85322@newssvr13.news.prodigy .com...
> > as global warning.
> >
> > Well, look at this and tell me what you think.
> >
> > http://www.break.com/pictures/bb8651.html (Not Safe For Work because of
> > advertising)
> >
> >
>
>

"Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:RReqg.126457$dW3.73386@newssvr21.news.prodigy .com...
>
> "George Price" <gprice3@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:QL1qg.26853$LT2.18650@tornado.tampabay.rr.com ...
>> FWIW, this should cut through the bullshit on the subject.
>>
>> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
>>
>> and further:
>>
>> http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002545.html
>>
>> Assuming the receptacle of information has a basic science background.
> The
>> general population hasn't any knowledge of what DNA is, what it does, and
>> how it pertains to laws to be voted on. How would one expect the general
>> population to understand global warming?
>>
>> George
>
> uhhh... did you follow my link? If not, you should. Not because I'm
> trying
> to prove you wrong (or right for that matter), but just because... well...
> follow it and you'll see.
>
>>

In that light, it would be a good thing, or am I wrong about that?

"George Price" <gprice3@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rBmqg.27913$LT2.5802@tornado.tampabay.rr.com. ..
>
> "Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:RReqg.126457$dW3.73386@newssvr21.news.prodigy .com...
> >
> > "George Price" <gprice3@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:QL1qg.26853$LT2.18650@tornado.tampabay.rr.com ...
> >> FWIW, this should cut through the bullshit on the subject.
> >>
> >> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
> >>
> >> and further:
> >>
> >> http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002545.html
> >>
> >> Assuming the receptacle of information has a basic science background.
> > The
> >> general population hasn't any knowledge of what DNA is, what it does,
and
> >> how it pertains to laws to be voted on. How would one expect the
general
> >> population to understand global warming?
> >>
> >> George
> >
> > uhhh... did you follow my link? If not, you should. Not because I'm
> > trying
> > to prove you wrong (or right for that matter), but just because...
well...
> > follow it and you'll see.
> >
> >>
>
> In that light, it would be a good thing, or am I wrong about that?

See, I told you so.