OT: Lawmakers finally get one right

In spite of their best efforts, this one should fly through and have full
bipartisan support.

http://www.local6.com/news/9553532/detail.html

Hwæt! "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com>, men ne cunnon secgan
to soðe:

> In spite of their best efforts, this one should fly through
> and have full bipartisan support.
>
> http://www.local6.com/news/9553532/detail.html


Aren't you afraid for yourself, Scotty?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Scott wrote:
> In spite of their best efforts, this one should fly through and have full
> bipartisan support.
>
> http://www.local6.com/news/9553532/detail.html

# Establish a comprehensive federal DNA database of material collected
from convicted molesters, and procedures for the routine DNA collection
and comparison to the database when someone has been convicted of such
an offense.
# Provide federal funding for states to track pedophiles using global
positioning devices.
# Allow victims of child abuse to sue their molesters.
# Impose a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years for raping a child.
# Impose a mandatory 10-year penalty for sex trafficking offenses
involving children and for coercing child prostitution.
Increase minimum sentences for molesters who travel between states.

Nice to see decent use for mandatory minimums.

I think a bullet and a hole in the ground are much cheaper
alternatives, though.

"Jerome's Sock Puppet" <jerome.oneil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153499066.584940.69700@h48g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...

> # Establish a comprehensive federal DNA database of material collected
> from convicted molesters, and procedures for the routine DNA collection
> and comparison to the database when someone has been convicted of such
> an offense.
> # Provide federal funding for states to track pedophiles using global
> positioning devices.
> # Allow victims of child abuse to sue their molesters.
> # Impose a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years for raping a child.
> # Impose a mandatory 10-year penalty for sex trafficking offenses
> involving children and for coercing child prostitution.
> Increase minimum sentences for molesters who travel between states.
>
> Nice to see decent use for mandatory minimums.

30 years is a slap on the wrist. Their victims do time every day for the
rest of their lives.

> I think a bullet and a hole in the ground are much cheaper
> alternatives, though.

I concur.

Hwæt! Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com>, men
ne cunnon secgan to soðe:

> Like I said,"if I was *many* years younger"... These days, I
> look at the 30-something women and consider them "young
> sutff"... <dirty-old-man-grin>
>
> Unfortuantely, all I get to do is *look*...

They take one look at you and pull out the pepper spray.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel wrote:

> > # Establish a comprehensive federal DNA database of material
>
> It's the first step in establishing a DNA database of all
> inhabitants of the USA.

I think they picked a fine population to start with.

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g-OdnbdDWo-WglzZnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@wavecable.com...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1e32c2dhdlrg9v8tc9lcuns5fl2c9taele@4ax.com...
>
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:12:47 -0700, "Scott"
> > <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In spite of their best efforts, this one should fly through and have
> full
> > > bipartisan support.
>
> > As a general principle, I tend to be suspicious of anything that
> > *both* parties support... Figure that there's got to be a catch there
> > *somewhere*...
>
> Of course, it's politicians and major election are looming. Same as with
> illegal immigration, the politicians are simply going to kick that issue
> down the road into the next administration, no matter which party.
>
> A very good friend of mine was in prison for three years after being
falsly
> accused and convited of rape. Anyone who knew him, then or now, knew that
> the beef was bullshit, but the DA was trying to make a name for himself
and
> the typical thing happened.
>
> He only got out after the girl started feeling guilty and finally told the
> truth, which the DA tried to talk her out of doing. She was covering up
for
> getting pregnant and the subsequent abortion.
>
> I think she should have had to do the 12 years he got sentenced to, and
the
> DA should be personally liable for suit.
>
>
Just read something today about someone who served a 23 year sentence -
finally exonerated by DNA evidence.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/...166494221.html

But in the case to which you're referring - yeah, except that if she were
facingt he 12 years, likely she'd not have come forward.

Dennis

"Jerome's Sock Puppet" <jerome.oneil@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153512707.612919.81980@s13g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Carl Nisarel wrote:
>
> > > # Establish a comprehensive federal DNA database of material
> >
> > It's the first step in establishing a DNA database of all
> > inhabitants of the USA.
>
> I think they picked a fine population to start with.
>

They already have DNA on everyone that has been in the military since
Vietnam. This will be the second group.

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:30:19 GMT, "William Dryden"
<william_dryden@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> They already have DNA on everyone that has been in the military since
> Vietnam. This will be the second group.

Sure about that? I remember them giving me a 'ell of a lot of shots,
but don't remember them taking blood from me... Oh wait a minute...
The must have taken some at some point so that they could determine my
blood type since it was on my dog tags... Still, I don't think they
were advanced enough with DNA back then to do it... The current guys
definitely have their DNA recorded... Gonna make it all the more
difficult to fill a grave for the Unknown Soldier for future wars...

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g-OdnbdDWo-WglzZnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@wavecable.com...
> "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1e32c2dhdlrg9v8tc9lcuns5fl2c9taele@4ax.com...
>
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:12:47 -0700, "Scott"
>> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > In spite of their best efforts, this one should fly through and have
> full
>> > bipartisan support.
>
>> As a general principle, I tend to be suspicious of anything that
>> *both* parties support... Figure that there's got to be a catch there
>> *somewhere*...
>
> Of course, it's politicians and major election are looming. Same as with
> illegal immigration, the politicians are simply going to kick that issue
> down the road into the next administration, no matter which party.
>
> A very good friend of mine was in prison for three years after being
> falsly
> accused and convited of rape. Anyone who knew him, then or now, knew that
> the beef was bullshit, but the DA was trying to make a name for himself
> and
> the typical thing happened.
>
> He only got out after the girl started feeling guilty and finally told the
> truth, which the DA tried to talk her out of doing. She was covering up
> for
> getting pregnant and the subsequent abortion.
>
> I think she should have had to do the 12 years he got sentenced to, and
> the
> DA should be personally liable for suit.
>
>
You've been watchin to much tv faggit. After 3 years she started feelin
guilty.............that just down right funny.