|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. From my experience and opinion, I understand the word to mean: de, as in removing or taking away and compression to mean to add external force to something to reduce it's size. In my experience, I consider every dive in the ascending phase to be a decompression portion of the dive and the descending portion to be the 'compression' phase of the dive. Anytime a diver decreases their depth in the water, it becomes a 'decompression' activity. Is it appropriate for one to say generically that every dive is a decompression dive as one is supposed to eventually return to the surface? Thanks. Waterlog |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Waterlog wrote: > I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of > the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. From > my experience and opinion, I understand the word to mean: de, as in > removing or taking away and compression to mean to add external force > to something to reduce it's size. In my experience, I consider every > dive in the ascending phase to be a decompression portion of the dive > and the descending portion to be the 'compression' phase of the dive. > Anytime a diver decreases their depth in the water, it becomes a > 'decompression' activity. Is it appropriate for one to say generically > that every dive is a decompression dive as one is supposed to > eventually return to the surface? > Thanks. Waterlog > Technically, yes, but the weak attempt at the DIR BS of "Every dive is a deco dive" is just that - a weak Attempt at BS. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| This could get ugly, but generally, most divers use subject term when "off-gassing excessive nitrogen" would probably be a better choice of words. -- Rapid Rick "Just Dive, Baby" >I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of > the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| James Connell wrote: > Waterlog wrote: > > I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of > > the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. From > > my experience and opinion, I understand the word to mean: de, as in > > removing or taking away and compression to mean to add external force > > to something to reduce it's size. In my experience, I consider every > > dive in the ascending phase to be a decompression portion of the dive > > and the descending portion to be the 'compression' phase of the dive. > > Anytime a diver decreases their depth in the water, it becomes a > > 'decompression' activity. Is it appropriate for one to say generically > > that every dive is a decompression dive as one is supposed to > > eventually return to the surface? > > Thanks. Waterlog > > > > Technically, yes, but the weak attempt at the DIR BS of "Every dive is a > deco dive" is just that - a weak Attempt at BS. I would argue that until you can show positively that NO form of decompression is occurring on ascent from a dive, that every dive is indeed a decompression dive. This description is used by many who have associated with GUE and propbably was before GUE came into existance - at least I heard it when JJ was still a toddler. * |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Star wrote: > James Connell wrote: > >>Waterlog wrote: >> >>>I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of >>>the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. From >>>my experience and opinion, I understand the word to mean: de, as in >>>removing or taking away and compression to mean to add external force >>>to something to reduce it's size. In my experience, I consider every >>>dive in the ascending phase to be a decompression portion of the dive >>>and the descending portion to be the 'compression' phase of the dive. >>>Anytime a diver decreases their depth in the water, it becomes a >>>'decompression' activity. Is it appropriate for one to say generically >>>that every dive is a decompression dive as one is supposed to >>>eventually return to the surface? >>>Thanks. Waterlog >>> >> >>Technically, yes, but the weak attempt at the DIR BS of "Every dive is a >>deco dive" is just that - a weak Attempt at BS. > > > I would argue that until you can show positively that NO form of > decompression is occurring on ascent from a dive, that every dive is > indeed a decompression dive. This description is used by many who have > associated with GUE and propbably was before GUE came into existance - > at least I heard it when JJ was still a toddler. > That was certainly pointed out in Paul Bert's research, published 1878. No doubt he got the idea from GUE, though. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Star wrote: > James Connell wrote: >> Waterlog wrote: >>> I am interested in compiling the various meanings and understandings of >>> the word 'decompression' as understood by many of us divers today. From >>> my experience and opinion, I understand the word to mean: de, as in >>> removing or taking away and compression to mean to add external force >>> to something to reduce it's size. In my experience, I consider every >>> dive in the ascending phase to be a decompression portion of the dive >>> and the descending portion to be the 'compression' phase of the dive. >>> Anytime a diver decreases their depth in the water, it becomes a >>> 'decompression' activity. Is it appropriate for one to say generically >>> that every dive is a decompression dive as one is supposed to >>> eventually return to the surface? >>> Thanks. Waterlog >>> >> Technically, yes, but the weak attempt at the DIR BS of "Every dive is a >> deco dive" is just that - a weak Attempt at BS. > > I would argue that until you can show positively that NO form of > decompression is occurring on ascent from a dive, that every dive is > indeed a decompression dive. This description is used by many who have > associated with GUE and propbably was before GUE came into existance - > at least I heard it when JJ was still a toddler. > > * > So just what part of "Technically, yes," did you have trouble with? you stupid bastard. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [MAGAZINE OCTOPUS EN CD] Format du fichier "An Intro to Tech Diving" | vincent daanen | (French) | 2 | 04-12-2007 12:54 AM |
| [HELP] "mares m1 rgbm" oppure "aladin ultra" | sor marchese | (Italian) | 49 | 04-11-2007 01:39 PM |
| Diving "Lac de Tignes" /France - Lake from Luc Bessons "the big blue" film | Michael Schmidt | France | 5 | 03-26-2007 12:08 PM |
| "Hamburg", "Thielbek", "Cap Arcona"... | diverhans | (German) | 94 | 01-03-2007 08:12 AM |
| Re: Nach "Kostenlos telefonieren für 25 Euro" jetzt auch "Kostenloser AOWD" | Joachim Warner | (German) | 12 | 05-12-2006 02:17 PM |