Re: MI5 Persecution: A letter from MI5

Thus spake Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> :

>On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:57:44 -0500, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
>wrote:
>> He has spammed a bunch of the newgroups with this drivel.
>
>Yeah, I saw it on the rec.aviation.piloting newsgroup also... It
>doesn't take long to decide that this sort of kook belongs in the
>killfile... Since he uses the same faked email address on all the
>messages at least the kill rule is simple -- in fact simple enough
>that even those with OE can do it... Killfiling the anonymous remailer
>domains took a bit more -- filtering on the Message ID field in the
>headers... OE can't do that, Pan can, but I don't see a way to do it
>in Agent without using more rules than are necessary than with Pan...

It's easy in Agent. The RE will work with just the domain name. I
delete everything in the sender field except for the domain and it
works just fine.
--
dillon

If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:02:36 -0600, Dillon Pyron
<dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> It's easy in Agent. The RE will work with just the domain name. I
> delete everything in the sender field except for the domain and it
> works just fine.

I've seen cases where they changed the domain name, but the Message ID
still had the same substring... Some of the anonymous fucks are
spoofing the "From" field, but they aren't spoofing the Message ID
field... I've got them blocked out in Agent, but it took more rules to
do it than it did with Pan...

Don't give them any ideas. I get spam daily from some seller of useless
stocks. Every one of them is an image file. No text in them at all. Every
one appears to come from a different source and every one of them comes with
a different subject line. So far, I've had no luck at all killing them.

Lee

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:losvm2tk410aceupcnnsvjmm68na8pv57f@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:02:36 -0600, Dillon Pyron
> <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>> It's easy in Agent. The RE will work with just the domain name. I
>> delete everything in the sender field except for the domain and it
>> works just fine.
>
> I've seen cases where they changed the domain name, but the Message ID
> still had the same substring... Some of the anonymous fucks are
> spoofing the "From" field, but they aren't spoofing the Message ID
> field... I've got them blocked out in Agent, but it took more rules to
> do it than it did with Pan...

"Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:e%Tbh.35216$K9.34237@bignews4.bellsouth.net.. .

> Don't give them any ideas. I get spam daily from some seller of useless
> stocks. Every one of them is an image file. No text in them at all.
Every
> one appears to come from a different source and every one of them comes
with
> a different subject line. So far, I've had no luck at all killing them.

> Lee

Get a gmail address. Gmail slays them.

Let me know if you want an invite.

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6ipum2lekqvptiqdkk6coevmc1om29picv@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:52:18 GMT, "Chris Guynn"
> <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In OE, I just added a rule that says "where the
> > From Line Contains: " and then listed the different
> > domains (ex: cypherpunks.to) and the gave it an
> > action of "Delete it". Anytime a new one pops up, I
> > just add the remailer to the list. Works great.
> > I also threw in a couple of "catch-alls" like
> > "anonymous" and "nisarel".
>
> When I use OE, that's what I have to do, but with Pan, it's a lot
> easier... Some of the remailers change the "From" field so that it
> takes multiple rules to filter out everything that comes from a single
> remailer...

I've never noticed that the domain changes and that's all I put in (not the full address). Anyway,
it's easy enough to add new entries so anytime a new domain pops up I just throw it in there.

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:09:24 -0500, "Lee Bell" <pleebell@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> Don't give them any ideas. I get spam daily from some seller of useless
> stocks. Every one of them is an image file. No text in them at all. Every
> one appears to come from a different source and every one of them comes with
> a different subject line. So far, I've had no luck at all killing them.

Every once in awhile, one of those slips through Gmail, but then I'll
use the Gmail web interface and click on the Report Spam button...
Over time, it seems that I get less of them...

> Get a gmail address. Gmail slays them.

I have a G mail address. I don't know how or when to use it. I wonder if
anyone writes to it.

Lee

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:26:29 -0500, "Lee Bell"
<pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I have a G mail address. I don't know how or when to use it. I wonder if
> anyone writes to it.

Basically, you need to start using it and quit using your other email
addresses... Most of us just see the email address that you have
listed on your newsgroup posts and use it -- possibly removing the '2'
from the end of your account name if we happen to remember it... I
determined awhile back that when I was working out of town and having
different ISPs, it really wasn't worthwhile to use the email account
that my ISP provided... Periodically, I'll look in my houston.rr.com
account, but the only thing that ends up there these days is spam...
RoadRunner does not have a spam filter, so *everything* ends up in the
inbox... When I use one of my Linux systems to check mail in that
account, the mail program on it filters the spam very well... So well
that I'll end up with a couple hundred emails in the spam folder /
trash and none in the inbox...

Grumman-581 wrote

>> I have a G mail address. I don't know how or when to use it. I wonder
>> if
>> anyone writes to it.

> Basically, you need to start using it and quit using your other email
> addresses...

That's a bit of a hassel, particularly since I correspond quite a bit with
those who have my bellsouth and netcom addresses. Slowly, but surely, I'm
weeding out those I want to hear from that still have the netcom address.
Then there's my official address, the one I rarely use for anything outside
the government. The government is not real understanding of porn that shows
up on their systems, even when the recipient had no desire to receive it.
Using a G-mail account, or a Yahoo account, etc. would simply complicate
everything even further. When things get bad enough, I may try.

> Most of us just see the email address that you have listed on your
> newsgroup posts and use it -- possibly removing the '2'
> from the end of your account name if we happen to remember it...

Which is as I intended. That's a real e-mail address, it's just not my
primary one. Anything going to that address is segregated into a spamtrap
folder. I look for people I want to hear from before deleting messages, but
don't look as often, or as closely, as I do when messages come to my primary
account. I could change the address further, but so far, it's been a
reasonable compromise between blocking all private mail that comes from
newsgroups and getting all the spam that comes as a result of my
particpation in them.

Lee

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:56:33 -0500, "Lee Bell"
<pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I could change the address further, but so far, it's been a
> reasonable compromise between blocking all private mail that
> comes from newsgroups and getting all the spam that comes as
> a result of my particpation in them.

I figure that anyone who can't figure out how to un-obfuscate my email
address that I use for newsgroup postings probably isn't someone whose
email really needs to be read anyway... <grin> Unfortunately, if I'm
posting from Google Groups, I don't have the option to obfuscate my
email address unless I just create a new Gmail account explicitly for
newsgroup communication and never check the email in there... That
kind of defeats the desired action of letting the email bounce back to
the sender if they make a mistake and just reply to a newsgroup
posting via email without checking for obfuscations in the email
address... Oh well... Nothing's perfect I guess...