Re: MI5 Persecution: A letter from MI5

Charlie?

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:46:11 +0000, "Magilla" wrote:
> Charlie?

Don't know who he is, but definitely his tin foil hat is on a bit too
tight...

""Magilla"" <cavey_curtis@$$ yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7usbh.391875$QZ1.372444@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

> Charlie?

<cough>

I guess the Brits have one as well.

Scott wrote

> I guess the Brits have one as well.

I have no clue who he is, but he earned a spot in my blocked list late last
night. Hell, if he's just complain about gun control in the UK, he'd be
made to feel right at home.

Lee

Grumman-581 wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:46:11 +0000, "Magilla" wrote:
>
>>Charlie?
>
>
> Don't know who he is, but definitely his tin foil hat is on a bit too
> tight...
>
He has spammed a bunch of the newgroups with this drivel.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:57:44 -0500, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
wrote:
> He has spammed a bunch of the newgroups with this drivel.

Yeah, I saw it on the rec.aviation.piloting newsgroup also... It
doesn't take long to decide that this sort of kook belongs in the
killfile... Since he uses the same faked email address on all the
messages at least the kill rule is simple -- in fact simple enough
that even those with OE can do it... Killfiling the anonymous remailer
domains took a bit more -- filtering on the Message ID field in the
headers... OE can't do that, Pan can, but I don't see a way to do it
in Agent without using more rules than are necessary than with Pan...

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:328um25mc9suloibut8658odet19l3sb4a@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:57:44 -0500, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:

> > He has spammed a bunch of the newgroups with this drivel.

It's an odd existence, these people live.

One would almost be compelled to pity them, if they werent so obnoxious.

> Yeah, I saw it on the rec.aviation.piloting newsgroup also... It
> doesn't take long to decide that this sort of kook belongs in the
> killfile... Since he uses the same faked email address on all the
> messages at least the kill rule is simple -- in fact simple enough
> that even those with OE can do it... Killfiling the anonymous remailer
> domains took a bit more -- filtering on the Message ID field in the
> headers... OE can't do that, Pan can, but I don't see a way to do it
> in Agent without using more rules than are necessary than with Pan...

Works just fine for me.

The best part is the anonymous jackass was sending messages to my e-mail
account, so I forwarded copies of them to gmail admin, and blocked my
address from every remailer he abuses.

I told him a long time ago that soon he would be rendered silent by the
system he abuses, and he has been.

Same with "Carl".

No one has to listen to his tantrums.

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:328um25mc9suloibut8658odet19l3sb4a@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:57:44 -0500, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
> > He has spammed a bunch of the newgroups with this drivel.
>
> Yeah, I saw it on the rec.aviation.piloting newsgroup also... It
> doesn't take long to decide that this sort of kook belongs in the
> killfile... Since he uses the same faked email address on all the
> messages at least the kill rule is simple -- in fact simple enough
> that even those with OE can do it... Killfiling the anonymous remailer
> domains took a bit more -- filtering on the Message ID field in the
> headers... OE can't do that, Pan can, but I don't see a way to do it
> in Agent without using more rules than are necessary than with Pan...

In OE, I just added a rule that says "where the From Line Contains: " and then listed the different
domains (ex: cypherpunks.to) and the gave it an action of "Delete it". Anytime a new one pops up, I
just add the remailer to the list. Works great. I also threw in a couple of "catch-alls" like
"anonymous" and "nisarel".

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:36pum2pnaaaeo1uhsoec09kb48ufkkue7f@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:17:11 -0800, "Scott"
> <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
> > No one has to listen to his tantrums.

> Yeah, listening to his blabbering was one of the disadvantages of
> using Google Groups while I was up in Toronto... Since Grace was going
> to still be up there after I left, there's no way I was going to give
> my hotel room number out...

Of course not, especially not in reply to the simpering of a sick fuck like
"Nisarel".

> It's not that I worry about him since it's
> not possible to entice him to even leave his mother's closet and quit
> sniffing her soiled panties, but I see no advantage to posting her
> hotel room number on a public forum like that, especially since she
> isn't carrying while up there...

She would be fine; the thought of meeting a woman face to face would terrify
him, but there is no reason to entertain a jackoff like him.

Just more of his sophomoric trolling.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:34:06 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
> She would be fine; the thought of meeting a woman face to face would terrify
> him, but there is no reason to entertain a jackoff like him.

Nawh, I was more concerned with a possible stranger reading it and
thus knowing that there was an unarmed woman staying alone in a
particular room at a particular hotel... Here at home, I'm not really
concerned since she has a gun accessible no matter where she might
be... I'm not really concerned with anyone accessing the house while
we're both away either because of an alarm system in addition to a
tripwire and a shotgun in the locked room with the gun safe... Yeah,
there's probably some legality issues with an active home defense
system like this, but it only becomes an issue if someone is where
they shouldn't be (and more importantly, their body is found
afterwards)... Which of course brings up the issue of my needing to
get a couple of gators for the lake behind my house... Hopefully, I'll
have better luck on my next trip to Florida...