|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect on you." Care to comment? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <capt.bill11@verizon.net> wrote in message news:1171320071.437353.144450@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com... > "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects > different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial > pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up > "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a > safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and > oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect > on you." > > Care to comment? > Sounds like a troll to me! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| <capt.bill11@verizon.net> wrote in message news:1171320071.437353.144450@p10g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com... > "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects > different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial > pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up > "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a > safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and > oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect > on you." > Care to comment? Where did you get that doozy? http://www.scuba-doc.com/narked.html http://www.sfu.ca/~jmorriso/kin485/i...s_narcosis.doc http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/...tract/96/3/746 |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| capt.bill11@verizon.net wrote: > "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects > different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial > pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up > "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a > safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and > oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect > on you." > > Care to comment? > Firstly, you need to stop sniffing cans of whipping cream Secondly, you're wrong. Nitric oxide (NO) is a common component in our bodies which plays a central role in numerous things, ranging from neurotransduction, to bacterial clearance, to giving you an erection. It's only known synthesis pathway within our bodies is via enzymes called "nitric oxide synthetase" - AKA NOS. None of these use nitrogen as a reagent, as nitrogen is simply too chemically inert for our bodies to convert it into anything. Instead, the nitrogen is stripped from L-argine, an amino acid. The anesthetic effect of NO appears to be due to its absorption into neural cell membranes, where it interferes with the transmission of neural impulses. Bryan |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| capt.bill11@verizon.net wrote > "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects > different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial > pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up > "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a > safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and > oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect > on you." Care to comment? Interesting. First, Bill's been around for a long time. Hi Bill. Nice to see you back. Second, he's not a troll, unless your definition of troll includes on topic comments intended to stimulate interesting discussion. If this is a troll, we could use more like it. Several people pointed out that nitrogen narcosis is a form of inert gas narcosis, sure it is, but that does not mean that the nitrogen causing the inert gas narcosis isn't nitrous oxide, N2O rather than N2. Personally, I haven't a clue, but it's an interesting idea. Lee |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Bryan Heit wrote >> As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and oxygen combine to form >> "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect >> on you." > Secondly, you're wrong. Nitric oxide (NO) is a common component in our > bodies which plays a central role in numerous things, ranging from > neurotransduction, to bacterial clearance, to giving you an erection. It's > only known synthesis pathway within our bodies is via enzymes called > "nitric oxide synthetase" - AKA NOS. None of these use nitrogen as a > reagent, as nitrogen is simply too chemically inert for our bodies to > convert it into anything. Instead, the nitrogen is stripped from > L-argine, an amino acid. > > The anesthetic effect of NO appears to be due to its absorption into > neural cell membranes, where it interferes with the transmission of neural > impulses. Seems to me that he's not the only one that's wrong. Everything I've seen says that Nitrous Oxide, also known as dinitrogen monoxide, is N2O, not NO. As for interfering with the transmission of neural impulses, doesn't that describe nitrogen narcosis as well? Lee |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 12, 9:18 pm, "Lee Bell" <pleebe...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > capt.bil...@verizon.net wrote > > > "The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects > > different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial > > pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up > > "air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a > > safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and > > oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect > > on you." Care to comment? > > Interesting. > > First, Bill's been around for a long time. Hi Bill. Nice to see you back. > Second, he's not a troll, unless your definition of troll includes on topic > comments intended to stimulate interesting discussion. If this is a troll, > we could use more like it. > > Several people pointed out that nitrogen narcosis is a form of inert gas > narcosis, sure it is, but that does not mean that the nitrogen causing the > inert gas narcosis isn't nitrous oxide, N2O rather than N2. Personally, I > haven't a clue, but it's an interesting idea. > > Lee Thanks Lee for the "welcome back". I got that off a boating forum that I visit. They just started a diving section and a discussion on NN came up. Some one posted that ditty as fact. When I called him on it he said when he got certified his instructor claimed that was the cause of NN. Scary what gets passed on as fact in some course classes. This is more like what I understand the cause to be: "Scientists aren't sure, but most now accept what's called the Meyer- Overton hypothesis, that narcosis happens when the gas penetrates the lipids (the fatty structures) of the brain's nerve cells. Here it apparently interferes with the transmission of signals from one nerve cell to another and disrupts your central processor. It's a little like spilling a Coke onto your computer keyboard." |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| <capt.bill11@verizon.net> wrote> "Scientists aren't sure, but most now accept what's called the Meyer- > Overton hypothesis, that narcosis happens when the gas penetrates the > lipids (the fatty structures) of the brain's nerve cells. Here it > apparently interferes with the transmission of signals from one nerve > cell to another and disrupts your central processor. It's a little > like spilling a Coke onto your computer keyboard." Here's what Wikipedia says about nitrous oxide. "Nitrous oxide is relatively non polar, has a low molecular weight and high lipid solubility. As a result it can quickly diffuse into phospholipid cell membranes. Like many classical anesthetics, the exact mechanisms of action is still open to some conjecture. It inhibits the NMDA receptor at partial pressures similar to those used in general anesthesia." Not all that different, is it? Like I said, we're pretty sure that nitrogen is the culprit, but I still haven't seen anything that makes it clear that it's N2 and not N2O that carries the nitrogen to brain cells . . . and visa versa. Lee |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:03:17 -0500, Ron wrote: > capt.bill11@verizon.net wrote: >>"The next depth related danger occurs around 100 feet, and effects >>different people differntly. Now you start talking about "partial >>pressures" and other complex interactions of the gases that make up >>"air". Basically, air contains a lot of nitrogen, which is normally a >>safe harmless gas. As the pressure increases, however, nitrogen and >>oxygen combine to form "nitros oxide" which can have a dramatic effect >>on you." >> >>Care to comment? > > Why are you postulating a brand new mechanism? Or do > you suppose that Argon narcosis is actually due to > Argon Oxide? > Occan's Razor. Do you mean Occam's (Ockham's) razor? |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| capt.bill11@verizon.net wrote: > > "Scientists aren't sure, but most now accept what's called the Meyer- > Overton hypothesis, that narcosis happens when the gas penetrates the > lipids (the fatty structures) of the brain's nerve cells. Here it > apparently interferes with the transmission of signals from one nerve > cell to another and disrupts your central processor. It's a little > like spilling a Coke onto your computer keyboard." > There are studies which indicate a 1/6 narcotic potential for oxygen with repect to nitrogen. Anyhow, the Meyer-Overton hypothesis does not count for the oxygen window, and thus not for the loss of partial pressure due to metabolism. Matthias |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New nitrox standards explained | Divetheworld | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:36 PM |
| Nitrogen Narcosis revisited | recscuba@ellipse.us | Divers Hangout | 10 | 03-26-2007 06:20 PM |
| Re: Chronic nitrogen narcosis | brdavis@iusb.edu | Divers Hangout | 22 | 03-26-2007 11:58 AM |
| OT: Kerry explained | Scott | Divers Hangout | 0 | 03-26-2007 10:57 AM |