Must be a Canadian gun

Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick napisal(a):
> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1163519379.492475.204080@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick napisal(a):
> >> "Matthias Voss" <spammat.voss@gmx.de> wrote in message
>
> >> Aluminunm case?
> >>
> >> Berdan primed?
> >
> > You think so - CITE
>
> Doesn't the Polish language have question marks?
Check

Scotty started with aluminium case, you added Berdan - so prove your
point or sh....

>
> >> >> FYI on Brasilian market 32 cal. revolvers are quite popular.
> >>
> >> Flat out Liar.
> >
> > If you state otherwise - CITE
> > BTW you are proved LIAR here.
>
> Maybe after you cite, which you failed to do.

Dumbo, I have stated something, what is easily verifable using Google
and you want me to provide cite? LOL
BTW you are supposed to be "gun expert" - so if don't agree with my
statement provide your famous "CITE" - of course if you can find it.





>
> >> CITE!!!!!
> >>
> >> How would you know, are you a Brazilian gun collector?
> >
> > Reading has future
>
> So does gramar.

Do you mean grammar?

>
> >> >> So, in other words, if you state that it could be rim fire - CITE
> >>
> >> There are upwards of a dozen .32 calibers- you're talking out your ass-
> >>
> >> Several of them couldn't penetrate a skull on their best day-
> >
> > CITE (FYI dozen means twelve)
>
> Are you stating there aren't?

Show your knowledge - CITE

>
> >> You stated that the caliber was .32 S&W Long- where's -your- cite?
> >
> > Better check what I stated and than you can ask why.
> >
> >>
> >> Run along, lapdog, you know less about firearms than Ontario Johnny.
> >>
> > So far you didn't prove that you have any expertise in the field, so
> > better "shut the fuck up".
>
> As if, Lapdog.

<janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163583521.056743.298100@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...
>
> bob crownfield napisal(a):

>> >> Aluminum case?
>> >>
>> >> Berdan primed?
>> >
>> > You think so - CITE
>>
>> come on, polski comerade,
>
> Bubba,
> It doesn't work. Try to rephrase it in English.

Works as good as "Bubba".

>> that was a question mark you missed.
>
> No
>
> Janusz

Yes.

Obviously.

Lapdog.

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote

>Yer right. Lapdogs are meant to lie.

We'll take your word for it.

Go gcreime na péisteoga do cheann "Douglas W \"Fatboy\" Frederick"
<Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>:

>
>
> "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>Yer right. Lapdogs are meant to lie.
>
> We'll take your word for it.

Nah, we'll just watch Scotty the pussy do it.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick wrote:
> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1163584577.499287.174130@k70g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick napisal(a):
>
>>>>> Aluminunm case?
>>>>>
>>>>> Berdan primed?
>>>> You think so - CITE
>>> Doesn't the Polish language have question marks?
>> Check
>>
>> Scotty started with aluminium case, you added Berdan - so prove your
>> point or sh....
>
> I didn't make a point, I offered a question, a possibility.
>
> That's what the question mark indicates to those of us with an education.
>
> I can see how it would confuse a lapdog like you.
>
>>>>>>> FYI on Brasilian market 32 cal. revolvers are quite popular.
>>>>> Flat out Liar.
>>>> If you state otherwise - CITE
>>>> BTW you are proved LIAR here.
>>> Maybe after you cite, which you failed to do.
>> Dumbo, I have stated something, what is easily verifable using Google
>
> Then easily verify it, since you have stated it.
>
> Obviously, what is easily you can't.
>
> Obviously, you are a LYING CANADIAN LAPDOG.
>
>> and you want me to provide cite? LOL
>> BTW you are supposed to be "gun expert" - so if don't agree with my
>> statement provide your famous "CITE" - of course if you can find it.
>
>>>>> CITE!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> How would you know, are you a Brazilian gun collector?
>>>> Reading has future
>>> So does gramar.
>> Do you mean grammar?
>
> Whoooooshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
>
>>>>>>> So, in other words, if you state that it could be rim fire - CITE
>>>>> There are upwards of a dozen .32 calibers- you're talking out your
>>>>> ass-
>>>>>
>>>>> Several of them couldn't penetrate a skull on their best day-
>>>> CITE (FYI dozen means twelve)
>>> Are you stating there aren't?
>> Show your knowledge - CITE
>
> State your fact, that they don't exist, and then I will.
>
> But as you say, it's easily verifiable with Google.
>
> Why do I have to cite my arguments as well as yours?
>
> Do you think I'm Polish?
>
>>>>> You stated that the caliber was .32 S&W Long- where's -your- cite?
>>>> Better check what I stated and than you can ask why.
>>>>
>>>>> Run along, lapdog, you know less about firearms than Ontario Johnny.
>>>>>
>>>> So far you didn't prove that you have any expertise in the field, so
>>>> better "shut the fuck up".
>>> As if, Lapdog.
>
> LLL
>
> AAA
>
> PPP
>
> DDD
>
> OOO
>
> GGG

polski is engaging in a battle of wits,
and he is unarmed.

>
>

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:33:31 +0000, Chris Guynn wrote:
> Not really... Lapdogs tend to be little annoying creatures that have no
> discernible worth.

Are you talking about the 4-legged ones or the Canadian posters in
question?

bob crownfield wrote:

> polski is engaging in a battle of wits,
> and he is unarmed.

Using his live ammo would give him an unfair advantage.

JF

Carl Nisarel wrote

>> That's what the question mark indicates to those of us with an
>> education.

> Fatboy thinks he's educated.

Actually, I think what he meant is that you're not. I think he may be
right.

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
newsan.2006.11.15.19.23.31.207831@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com...
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:33:31 +0000, Chris Guynn wrote:
> > Not really... Lapdogs tend to be little annoying creatures that have no
> > discernible worth.
>
> Are you talking about the 4-legged ones or the Canadian posters in
> question?

I don't personally know the Canadian posters in question, so I can't comment on their worth. I was
merely giving my impression of the term.

Beyond that, take it as you will.

Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick napisal(a):
> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1163584577.499287.174130@k70g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick napisal(a):
>
> >> >> Aluminunm case?
> >> >>
> >> >> Berdan primed?
> >> >
> >> > You think so - CITE
> >>
> >> Doesn't the Polish language have question marks?
> > Check
> >
> > Scotty started with aluminium case, you added Berdan - so prove your
> > point or sh....
>
> I didn't make a point, I offered a question, a possibility.

So did JOF. So did I. If you look up you will see "possibility",
"probability". Check what was your response. As usual you don't know
when you should "sh.......".

>
> That's what the question mark indicates to those of us with an education.

Us? Since when are you considered educated one? LOL


>
> I can see how it would confuse a lapdog like you.

>
> >> >> >> FYI on Brasilian market 32 cal. revolvers are quite popular.
> >> >>
> >> >> Flat out Liar.
> >> >
> >> > If you state otherwise - CITE
> >> > BTW you are proved LIAR here.
> >>
> >> Maybe after you cite, which you failed to do.
> >
> > Dumbo, I have stated something, what is easily verifable using Google
>
> Then easily verify it, since you have stated it.

Check Rossi and Taurus for example
if you wish google "revólver calibre 32" It is in Portuguese
(official language of Brazil)
Anyway they have right approach toward gun control
http://www.iansa.org/regions/sameric...ew_jan2005.htm

and this graph you would love
http://www.iansa.org/regions/sameric..._interview.htm

>
> Obviously, what is easily you can't.
>
> Obviously, you are a LYING CANADIAN LAPDOG.

Obviously the only proved (certified) liar here is FATBOY THE DUMB LIAR


>
> > and you want me to provide cite? LOL
> > BTW you are supposed to be "gun expert" - so if don't agree with my
> > statement provide your famous "CITE" - of course if you can find it.
>
> >> >> CITE!!!!!
> >> >>
> >> >> How would you know, are you a Brazilian gun collector?
> >> >
> >> > Reading has future
> >>
> >> So does gramar.
> >
> > Do you mean grammar?
>
> Whoooooshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
>
> >> >> >> So, in other words, if you state that it could be rim fire - CITE
> >> >>
> >> >> There are upwards of a dozen .32 calibers- you're talking out your
> >> >> ass-
> >> >>
> >> >> Several of them couldn't penetrate a skull on their best day-
> >> >
> >> > CITE (FYI dozen means twelve)
> >>
> >> Are you stating there aren't?
> >
> > Show your knowledge - CITE
>
> State your fact, that they don't exist, and then I will.

As you wish - there is no dozen different .32 caliber revolver ammo
systems in current use.

>
> But as you say, it's easily verifiable with Google.

So do your job, now.
>
> Why do I have to cite my arguments as well as yours?

You are supposed to be "the gun expert".

>
> Do you think I'm Polish?

No, you are too dumb to be one.

>
> >> >> You stated that the caliber was .32 S&W Long- where's -your- cite?
> >> >
> >> > Better check what I stated and than you can ask why.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Run along, lapdog, you know less about firearms than Ontario Johnny.
> >> >>
> >> > So far you didn't prove that you have any expertise in the field, so
> >> > better "shut the fuck up".
> >>
> >> As if, Lapdog.
>
> LLL
>
> AAA
>
> PPP
>
> DDD
>
> OOO
>
> GGG

Nice signature


Janusz