Must be a Canadian gun

On 3 Dec 2006 14:46:36 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
<janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>John R. Macdonald napisal(a):
>> On 2 Dec 2006 02:31:33 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
>> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Grumman-581 wrote:
>> >> On 1 Dec 2006 13:57:28 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
>> >> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > If you google "shotgun wedding" it pops up on the first page
>> >>
>> >> OK... I'll let you get away with that excuse since you're from Poland,
>> >> English is not your first language, and the term "shotgun wedding"
>> >> might be a colloquialism that you might not have even heard of
>> >> before...
>> >>
>> >> > Anyway nobody normal takes weapons to the wedding.
>> >>
>> >> Of course, I take issue with your definition of the term "normal"...
>> >
>> >mentally healthy?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I suspect it depends upon the time between the actual wedding and the
>> >> wedding reception... Considering the fact that there is usually
>> >> alcohol at the wedding receptions, weapons are obviously de rigeur
>> >> since few things go as well together as guns and booze...
>> >
>> >In some countries there is long time tradition of celebratory fire. If
>> >it is executed with single shot rifles or shotguns - it is not big
>> >problem. Sometimes it is automatic weapons and a lot of locally
>> >manufactured moonshine. Really explosive mixture.
>>
>> And when the countries are Afghanistan or Iraq it upsets the in
>> country Americans who call in air strikes ..
>
>I thought about some other countries (no much monshine in Iraq and
>Afghanistan), but as you mentioned them sometimes flying by American
>pilots take SA celebratory fire as deliberate antiaircraft fire and
>drop couple of gifts literally killing the wedding party.
>
yip yip yip




Some one shut that yappy little dog up

Rod napisal(a):
> On 3 Dec 2006 14:46:36 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >John R. Macdonald napisal(a):
> >> On 2 Dec 2006 02:31:33 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
> >> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Grumman-581 wrote:
> >> >> On 1 Dec 2006 13:57:28 -0800, "janusz_w@hotmail.com"
> >> >> <janusz_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > If you google "shotgun wedding" it pops up on the first page
> >> >>
> >> >> OK... I'll let you get away with that excuse since you're from Poland,
> >> >> English is not your first language, and the term "shotgun wedding"
> >> >> might be a colloquialism that you might not have even heard of
> >> >> before...
> >> >>
> >> >> > Anyway nobody normal takes weapons to the wedding.
> >> >>
> >> >> Of course, I take issue with your definition of the term "normal"...
> >> >
> >> >mentally healthy?
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I suspect it depends upon the time between the actual wedding and the
> >> >> wedding reception... Considering the fact that there is usually
> >> >> alcohol at the wedding receptions, weapons are obviously de rigeur
> >> >> since few things go as well together as guns and booze...
> >> >
> >> >In some countries there is long time tradition of celebratory fire. If
> >> >it is executed with single shot rifles or shotguns - it is not big
> >> >problem. Sometimes it is automatic weapons and a lot of locally
> >> >manufactured moonshine. Really explosive mixture.
> >>
> >> And when the countries are Afghanistan or Iraq it upsets the in
> >> country Americans who call in air strikes ..
> >
> >I thought about some other countries (no much monshine in Iraq and
> >Afghanistan), but as you mentioned them sometimes flying by American
> >pilots take SA celebratory fire as deliberate antiaircraft fire and
> >drop couple of gifts literally killing the wedding party.
> >
> yip yip yip
>
>
>
>
> Some one shut that yappy little dog up

Next time I'm in Philadelphia I'll help you.