|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| From another forum. Not everyone in Canada is a sheep. Lee ---------------------------------------------------------- For Immediate Release January 6, 2007 "Katey's Firearms Facts" film released Katey Montague, the daughter of Bruce and Donna Montague, has released her first short film, titled "Katey's Firearms Facts" on the video-sharing service YouTube.com. After researching some of the more ludicrous bungles by the CFC, Katey relates her findings in her own funny and engaging style. Katey has acted in Dryden's theatre scene for years. It only took the smallest encouragement from family friend Christopher di Armani to get Katey started in her first film project. Given Katey's lineage, it is not surprising that she shares her parents' passion for the truth. Once she saw how fun making her own movie was, Katey decided to launch her own YouTube channel to showcase her acting talent and her views on Canada's Firearms Act and self-defense. The first four video vignettes, which take a refreshing view of self-defense, have also been released on YouTube.com. To view Katey's film debut and her short videos, please visit her very own channel on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kateysfirearmsfacts |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Douglas W Popeye Frederick wrote > Are you sure she's Canadian? We've been assured, time, and time, and > time again, that Canadians nevern ever think about > things like this. Not only do they not consider it, They have no reason > to. Apparently, the problem is of our own making. No surpise there. It appears all Canadian problems are, in some way, our fault. At any rate, it looks like the roles of the sexes, in Canada, are reversed from those in this country. The men are nieve, dependent and passive. The women are sophisticated, alert and proactive. Our mistake appears to have been in assuming otherwise. Lee |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:AZOoh.2$U6.1@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > Douglas W Popeye Frederick wrote > >> Are you sure she's Canadian? We've been assured, time, and time, and >> time again, that Canadians nevern ever think about >> things like this. Not only do they not consider it, They have no reason >> to. > > Apparently, the problem is of our own making. No surpise there. It > appears all Canadian problems are, in some way, our fault. At any rate, > it looks like the roles of the sexes, in Canada, are reversed from those > in this country. The men are nieve, dependent and passive. The women are > sophisticated, alert and proactive. Our mistake appears to have been in > assuming otherwise. I dunno. Look at the balls on chilly. It's simply amazing that a 13 year old girl can study data and draw a simple, logical concussion that an allegedly open-minded, educated worldly 60 year old can spend years and years refusing to even attempt to understand. I'm beginning to see why he holds that Polish dipshit in such high esteem. -- From: Douglas W. Popeye Frederick - view profile Date: Tues, Apr 19 2005 11:28 am Email: "Douglas W. \"Popeye\" Frederick" <Buzcutt...@aol.com> "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote in message > "JOF" <johnfran...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:6i2a61tgclnn6eb0sg7jsgiv2oiturgv2b@4ax.com... > > Sage advice. Thinking presupposes an open mind. Having an open mind > > doesn't mean considering only the pro gun side of the argument. > "Like that nonsense that over-the-hill rock & roller in the camo cowboy > hat was spouting to the NRA convention." > Wide open, your mind. ====== > It's your right to arbitrarily place everyone who doesn't love guns in the > gungrabber category? What about the people who simply don't care? Are they > your enemies too? -JOF As far as we can tell. You've never weighed in at that position, however. -Popeye ====== "I try to couch my comments in neutrality. I try to remain dispassionate. Reason fails when passion rules, or something like that." -JOF ====== "and most of us have learned that to survive in this world we need to be open minded and willing to learn new things. I'm just trying to survive." _JOF ====== "In rec.scuba terms I think I'm pretty darned neutral." -JOF ====== >> >> > That "neutrality" thing needs a bit of polish. >> >> In rec.scuba terms I think I'm pretty darned neutral. >> > That "neutrality" thing needs a bit of polish. >> To bring it up to rec.scuba standards? 8) > To actually be doing what you, yourself, describe. That one whooshed me. -JOF ====== "It was a reference to some earlier comments of yours where you made erroneous assumptions based on what you thought I meant to say." -JOF ====== >> >> Frankly, most of our livelier discussions are exercises in endurance >> >> only, as few here seem prepared to move off their chosen party line >> >> regardless of how compelling the counter arguments might be. >> > That would include you, of course. >> I think I'm fairly open minded. I have conceded points in the past, but >> most of the time concessions are seen only as signs of weakness and the >> beginning of a total collapse, and nothing short of total capitulation is >> worth acknowledging. No "common middle ground" nonsense for hard core >> rec.scuba debaters. It's strictly all or nothing. That makes most of our >> discussions exercises in semantics only, but sometimes interesting all >> the same. > Like I said, that would include you, of course. No. I'm open to rational argument. -JOF ====== > At any rate, it was clear what you said, in a snobbish and insulting > manor. You guys are too sensitive. I wasn't saying anything like that, just defending my own point of view.-JOF ====== >> Perhaps you'd get more sympathy for your cause if you stopped referring >> to anyone who doesn't come out wholeheartedly in defense of absolute gun >> freedom as a "gungrabber". >Pure hyperbole. Hyperbole is exaggeration.-JOF "I believe the Second Amendment covers that. The "Shall not be infringed" part is evidently sacrosanct annd inviolable." ====== Popeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Popeye wrote: > > We've been assured, time, and time, and time again, > > That Canadians > > -Never-; > > -Ever-; > > Think about things like this. > > Not only do they not consider it, > > They have no reason to. > Cite please. Cam |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Cam" <cam.barr@beer.com> wrote in message news:1168447625.865783.17890@p59g2000hsd.googlegro ups.com... > Popeye wrote: >> >> We've been assured, time, and time, and time again, >> >> That Canadians >> >> -Never-; >> >> -Ever-; >> >> Think about things like this. >> >> Not only do they not consider it, >> >> They have no reason to. >> > > Cite please. I'll get right on it. -- Popeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Douglas W Popeye Frederick napisal(a): > "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:AZOoh.2$U6.1@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > > Douglas W Popeye Frederick wrote > > > >> Are you sure she's Canadian? We've been assured, time, and time, and > >> time again, that Canadians nevern ever think about > >> things like this. Not only do they not consider it, They have no reason > >> to. > > > > Apparently, the problem is of our own making. No surpise there. It > > appears all Canadian problems are, in some way, our fault. At any rate, > > it looks like the roles of the sexes, in Canada, are reversed from those > > in this country. The men are nieve, dependent and passive. The women are > > sophisticated, alert and proactive. Our mistake appears to have been in > > assuming otherwise. > > I dunno. > > Look at the balls on chilly. > > It's simply amazing that a 13 year old girl can study data and draw a > simple, logical concussion that an allegedly open-minded, educated worldly > 60 year old can spend years and years refusing to even attempt to > understand. > Dougy has new idol - 13 year old dumb blonde - LOL BTW there is a link to her father web page. He needs money. Be a man and send him some bucks. Support your fellow gun hugger. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Hwæt! "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net>, men ne cunnon secgan to soðe: > Katey Montague, the daughter of Bruce and Donna Montague Bruce Montague is a Canadian Gunhugger. Katey is just trying to please Daddy. In a couple of years, she'll wake up and tell him that he's a fuckin idiot. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Hwæt! "Douglas W \"Fatboy\" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com>, men ne cunnon secgan to soðe: >> Cite please. > > > I'll get right on it. And never produce it, as usual. It's as fictional as your claim to drive your truck in Canada with your firearms hidden in the truck. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:12qa8fh5pqlps32@news.supernews.com... > "Cam" <cam.barr@beer.com> wrote in message > news:1168447625.865783.17890@p59g2000hsd.googlegro ups.com... > > Popeye wrote: > >> > >> We've been assured, time, and time, and time again, > >> > >> That Canadians > >> > >> -Never-; > >> > >> -Ever-; > >> > >> Think about things like this. > >> > >> Not only do they not consider it, > >> > >> They have no reason to. > >> > > > > Cite please. > > > I'll get right on it. I take it Cam has neve rread JOF's posts on guns? Dennis |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:03:35 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote: >"Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in >message news:12qa8fh5pqlps32@news.supernews.com... >> "Cam" <cam.barr@beer.com> wrote in message >> news:1168447625.865783.17890@p59g2000hsd.googlegro ups.com... >> > Popeye wrote: >> >> >> >> We've been assured, time, and time, and time again, >> >> >> >> That Canadians >> >> >> >> -Never-; >> >> >> >> -Ever-; >> >> >> >> Think about things like this. >> >> >> >> Not only do they not consider it, >> >> >> >> They have no reason to. >> >> >> > >> > Cite please. >> >> >> I'll get right on it. > >I take it Cam has neve rread JOF's posts on guns? > >Dennis Right, and John said *ALL* Canadians *NEVER EVER* think about this kind of crap? I seem to recall it being more like *most Canadians*. Whatever. Let Peanut spout off against Canadians, just like he always does. It's still a boring, lame old ruse from a xenophobe. Must be time for Chester to show up... --- Mike from Ottawa |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: A rational Canadian approach to firearms. | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Fiji | 735 | 03-26-2007 09:14 PM |
| Re: A rational Canadian approach to firearms. | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Fiji | 16 | 03-26-2007 09:10 PM |
| Re: A rational Canadian approach to firearms. | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Fiji | 1 | 03-26-2007 09:07 PM |
| Re: A rational Canadian approach to firearms. | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Fiji | 8 | 03-26-2007 09:07 PM |
| Re: A rational Canadian approach to firearms. | Douglas W \Popeye\ Frederick | Fiji | 0 | 03-26-2007 09:07 PM |