|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
| |||
| |||
| "Popeye" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:11o7j0r957mutec@news.supernews.com... > > "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message > news:11o6kccn1bfa34e@corp.supernews.com... >> "Popeye" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message >> news:11o61mu5otc6v13@news.supernews.com... >> >>> His opinion and a dollar might get you a cup of coffee. >>> >>> Semper Fi. >>> >>> Iraq is a war, which you have no personal concept of. >> >> It's not a war. War means two or more armies fighting each other. Bush >> already declared an end to that war. We won. >> >> Now we have an occupation. Like most occupations, there is some >> resistance. The best way to end the resistance is to deoccupy. > > Get that off the back of a Stratego box? You like it? I was always good at Stratego. |
|
#102
| |||
| |||
| "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message news:11o7jq1b5rg7vb1@corp.supernews.com... > "Popeye" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message > news:11o7j0r957mutec@news.supernews.com... >> >> "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message >> news:11o6kccn1bfa34e@corp.supernews.com... >>> "Popeye" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message >>> news:11o61mu5otc6v13@news.supernews.com... >>> >>>> His opinion and a dollar might get you a cup of coffee. >>>> >>>> Semper Fi. >>>> >>>> Iraq is a war, which you have no personal concept of. >>> >>> It's not a war. War means two or more armies fighting each other. Bush >>> already declared an end to that war. We won. >>> >>> Now we have an occupation. Like most occupations, there is some >>> resistance. The best way to end the resistance is to deoccupy. >> >> Get that off the back of a Stratego box? > > You like it? > > I was always good at Stratego. Sounds -great- to the absolutely uninitiated. Send me an e-mail, I'm slap ass at the top of Donner Pass. > > |
|
#103
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:26:15 -0800, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote: > >"Geo" <ghmorris@candlelight.ca> wrote in message >news:1132707135.953681.206690@z14g2000cwz.googleg roups.com... >> >> Scott wrote: >> > >> > Pussies of a feather flock together. >> > >> In the absence of any meaningful content, can we take that as a >> "neener, neener"? >> >> God give me strength. > >This is fun. > >Foaming yet? Do you get the impression that Geo would be easily rattled by silly vacuous diatribe? I've read the internet accounts of how he impressed the pants off some pretty accomplished divers on his first few tech dives. Not that I've done it but I understand that's really saying something. He's also spent some time working in some pretty forbidding venues around the world and came through with flying colours. But best of all he survived a few years of life in the southeast Florida area. I know some real men who couldn't hack it there. Of course he took the easy route and spent much of his time aboard a 51' luxury water rocket. JF |
|
#104
| |||
| |||
| "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:non7o1p9pan5gj6fc747l8qa2t8ca198ej@4ax.com... > Do you get the impression that Geo would be easily rattled by silly vacuous diatribe? Thats why you are an asshole, John. You are the King of vacuous diatribe, backpeddling and spineless innuendo. No, I get the impression that he likes to call it and have no one challenge his intellect, or take on an issue, kinda like you. Now, as far as I and a couple other folks here are concerend, the vacuous diatribe is contirbuted by some of you canucks who arent at war, who's country hasnt been attacked (for going on 30 years), and whose countrymen arent out fighting wars for you, like ours are. We get real tired of you fuckers sitting back in your comfy little socialism, which couldnt be as comfy as it is without America spending the money to defend the entire continent, and taking cheap shots from the cheap seats. When was the last time you had to endure any one of us shitting on your leaders, laws, nation or service people? We endure it every time you all get bored. |
|
#105
| |||
| |||
| "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:rdr8o1lplsrcnirgpfkkceef6rjttrsejk@4ax.com... > This from the man who gets totally bent out of shape over anything > even mildly critical of what you hold dear. No, just not buying your bullshit. BIG difference you either dont understand, or are simply lying again. > If I thought it would make a difference I'd go back less than a week > in the ng and start citing posts that involve low grade insults to > Canada. ALL in response to you and yours making continuous attacks. Dig *just* a little, tiny bit deeper, and you will find the truth, but not likely to recognize it. > I can't say for sure that I could do the same for Canada's > service people. That would require going somewhat farther back, say to > the RCMP killings or some of the standard comments about the puny > Canadian military establishment. Those go right behind the attacks on America's significant military establishment. > As for laws we could look up some of > the comments about the Canadian Gun Registry or our immigration > policies. I suspect the only reason there's been nothing about our > leaders is because very few people south of the border have a clue who > our leaders actually are, or care. And, you forget, that we really dont need to hear, or give a shit, about your views on American gun laws posted to the scuba news group. Get it yet? > >We endure it every time you all get bored. > > Have you ever heard the expression "You only hurt the ones you love"? What a crock of shit. Love has an integer called "respect", which you are completely devoid of. <chop the sales pitch> Butt out. You didnt get attacked. Your embassies havent been bombed. You aint America, and could never be. |
|
#106
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:35:07 -0800, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote: > >"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:rdr8o1lplsrcnirgpfkkceef6rjttrsejk@4ax.com.. . > >> This from the man who gets totally bent out of shape over anything >> even mildly critical of what you hold dear. > >No, just not buying your bullshit. > >BIG difference you either dont understand, or are simply lying again. Why is everything you don't understand a lie? >> If I thought it would make a difference I'd go back less than a week >> in the ng and start citing posts that involve low grade insults to >> Canada. > >ALL in response to you and yours making continuous attacks. So we did it first? >Dig *just* a little, tiny bit deeper, and you will find the truth, but not >likely to recognize it. There's definitely some truth if you dig for it. Who is missing it is the point. >> I can't say for sure that I could do the same for Canada's >> service people. That would require going somewhat farther back, say to >> the RCMP killings or some of the standard comments about the puny >> Canadian military establishment. > >Those go right behind the attacks on America's significant military >establishment. We were the bullies again? >> As for laws we could look up some of >> the comments about the Canadian Gun Registry or our immigration >> policies. I suspect the only reason there's been nothing about our >> leaders is because very few people south of the border have a clue who >> our leaders actually are, or care. > >And, you forget, that we really dont need to hear, or give a shit, about >your views on American gun laws posted to the scuba news group. Yet you seem to care what we say. >Get it yet? I think I always have. Do you get it yet? >> >We endure it every time you all get bored. >> >> Have you ever heard the expression "You only hurt the ones you love"? > >What a crock of shit. Love has an integer called "respect", which you are >completely devoid of. > I have lots of whole numbers. What have they to do with respect? I also have lots of respect for the US. That's why I'm critical of the parts that are disappointing. ><chop the sales pitch> Of course you would. >Butt out. Not likely to happen. >You didnt get attacked. We didn't piss anybody off. >Your embassies havent been bombed. They flew the Canadian flag. >You aint America, and could never be. But for a fluke of climate and geography we may well have been. Picture an explorer at the helm of his sailing ship in Europe in the 1500's or 1600's or sometime later, or maybe he's standing in what will one day become Buffalo. At any rate he says to his crew "Okay guys, which way you wanna go? Southwest (or south) is a long growing season, warm water, lots of sun, topless babes on the beach and no snow. North or northwest is snow, lousy agriculture, and the babes are all wrapped in sealskins and they eat whale blubber. Let's vote." Gee, why do you think so many people ended up south of our border? JF |
|
#107
| |||
| |||
| "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:kmv8o198ua9vabj47khjcupcpmtqb45vf7@4ax.com... > Why is everything you don't understand a lie? It aint me, little man, it's you. Projection again. How boring. What you are experiencing is the result of literally years of your condescending bullshit. I am not buying what you are selling, and am sick of hearing your sales pitch? Get it? I doubt it. You think all you have to do is re-arrange the words. News flash; You arent that clever. > So we did it first? Google it. Then put your "integrity" where your lies are. > >Dig *just* a little, tiny bit deeper, and you will find the truth, but not > >likely to recognize it. > > There's definitely some truth if you dig for it. Who is missing it is > the point. Well, I dont expect you to ever admit you were wrong or started anything, it simply isnt in you. To do such a thing would require temerity and a spine, niether of which are character traits you encompass. > >Those go right behind the attacks on America's significant military > >establishment. > > We were the bullies again? What? Are you stupid? *YOU* in particular. You stirred the pot, John, and now you want to act innocent. As usual. > >> As for laws we could look up some of > >> the comments about the Canadian Gun Registry or our immigration > >> policies. I suspect the only reason there's been nothing about our > >> leaders is because very few people south of the border have a clue who > >> our leaders actually are, or care. > > > >And, you forget, that we really dont need to hear, or give a shit, about > >your views on American gun laws posted to the scuba news group. > > Yet you seem to care what we say. You got a turd in your pocket? How about I shit all over everything you hold dear, love and work for? Cocksucker. Ever serve in any military John? Ever been to a military funeral? You sling the shit then drop back on some unknown innocuous lack of intent. You have none, you have nothing. You get your little rocks off shitting on people here because you dont have the balls to do it in real life. You're a parasite. You create nothing, you build nothing, you make nothing, you free no one, you help no one, you are simply a zero thats sucks his living out of property sales. > >Get it yet? > > I think I always have. Do you get it yet? I get you just fine, 5x5. I also get so many other things that you never will it is just scary. > >> >We endure it every time you all get bored. > >> > >> Have you ever heard the expression "You only hurt the ones you love"? > > > >What a crock of shit. Love has an integer called "respect", which you are > >completely devoid of. > > > I have lots of whole numbers. What have they to do with respect? Perfectly illustrative of your ability to simply twist and lie. Integer. While the strict definition of integer has to do with whole numbers, in this context (here I am giving the retard an english lesson), as you know, the term integer is used to rebuke another of your lies, and what you assumed would be taken as a compliment, in some twisted way. You dont love America, you ridicule it. Because you are so much less. > I also have lots of respect for the US. That's why I'm critical of the > parts that are disappointing. What a crock of shit. You and people like you feel the need to look down your nose at somehting or someone to feel better about who you are, and what you are, and where you live. Why dont you fix the shithole you live in first? Or, immigrate and then have a voice. If rec.scuba is your best shot at "fixing" America, you infinitely more sad than I already thought. > ><chop the sales pitch> > > Of course you would. I heard it all before, John, It's a bad movie we have all walked out on. Tell you what; you start answering just *one* of the very specific questions that have been asked of you, and then you have room to bitch. Until then, you are a fucking liar. > >Butt out. > > Not likely to happen. Oh, we know, and we know why. > >You didnt get attacked. > > We didn't piss anybody off. Perfect. Now we see the real John and his take on world events. We asked for and deserved 9/11 and all the embassy bombings, the dead Marines in Beruit, but you dont have the balls to come out and say it. You fall back on the slimy innuendo that defines you. You couldnt piss anyone off because you do *nothing*. Canada and you are a great big zero on the world stage. > >Your embassies havent been bombed. > > They flew the Canadian flag. You flew the pussy flag. > >You aint America, and could never be. > > But for a fluke of climate and geography we may well have been. Not a chance. If you represent the typical Canadian, you have niether the balls nor the ability, regardless of geography. > Gee, why do you think so many people ended up south of our border? You tell us, Einstein. |
|
#108
| |||
| |||
| "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message news:JdOdnb3hM9-LEhnenZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@wavecable.com... > Integer. While the strict definition of integer has to do with whole > numbers, in this context (here I am giving the retard an english lesson), > as > you know, the term integer is used to rebuke another of your lies, and > what > you assumed would be taken as a compliment, in some twisted way. Cite? What, do you make up your own language as you go along? Maybe I'm a moron too. Please educate me on that English stuff, since you're obviously much smarter than my dictionary. And please tell me again how all your friends thought you should be a lawyer because you're such a brilliant guy, but you chose to become a machinist instead because you're so ethical. (which makes me recall the time that Angelmoon claimed her retarded stuttering brother was really a genius who just thought too fast for his mouth to keep up - perhaps that's what's wrong with you: a genius brain trapped in a a moronic trailer-trash body) 3 entries found for integer. in·te·ger ( P ) Pronunciation Key (nt-jr) n. Mathematics A member of the set of positive whole numbers 1, 2, 3,... , negative whole numbers -1, -2, -3,... , and zero {0}. A complete unit or entity. [From Latin, whole, complete. See tag- in Indo-European Roots.] Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. integer n : any of the natural numbers (positive or negative) or zero [syn: whole number] Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University integer <mathematics> (Or "whole number") One of the finite numbers in the infinite set ...., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ... An inductive definition of an integer is a number that is either zero or an integer plus or minus one. An integer is a number with no fractional part. If written as a fixed-point number, the part after the decimal (or other base) point will be zero. A natural number is a non-negative integer. |
|
#109
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:48:38 -0800, "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote: >What you are experiencing is the result of literally years of your >condescending bullshit. > >You arent that clever. > >Google it. Then put your "integrity" where your lies are. > >To do such a thing would require temerity and a spine, niether of which are >character traits you encompass. > >What? Are you stupid? > >*YOU* in particular. > >How about I shit all over everything you hold dear, love and work for? > >Cocksucker. > >You have none, you have nothing. You get your little rocks off shitting on >people here because you dont have the balls to do it in real life. > >You're a parasite. You create nothing, you build nothing, you make nothing, >you free no one, you help no one, you are simply a zero thats sucks his >living out of property sales. > >> >What a crock of shit. Love has an integer called "respect", which you are >> >completely devoid of. >Perfectly illustrative of your ability to simply twist and lie. > >Why dont you fix the shithole you live in first? > >Or, immigrate and then have a voice. If rec.scuba is your best shot at >"fixing" America, you infinitely more sad than I already thought. > >Until then, you are a fucking liar. > >We asked for and deserved 9/11 and all the embassy bombings, the dead >Marines in Beruit, but you dont have the balls to come out and say it. > >You fall back on the slimy innuendo that defines you. > >You couldnt piss anyone off because you do *nothing*. > >Canada and you are a great big zero on the world stage. > >You flew the pussy flag. > >Not a chance. If you represent the typical Canadian, you have niether the >balls nor the ability, regardless of geography. > Do you see any pattern in your vitriol? JF |
|
#110
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:01:20 -0800, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote: >"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:kmv8o198ua9vabj47khjcupcpmtqb45vf7@4ax.com.. . > >> But for a fluke of climate and geography we may well have been. >> Picture an explorer at the helm of his sailing ship in Europe in the >> 1500's or 1600's or sometime later, or maybe he's standing in what >> will one day become Buffalo. At any rate he says to his crew "Okay >> guys, which way you wanna go? Southwest (or south) is a long growing >> season, warm water, lots of sun, topless babes on the beach and no >> snow. North or northwest is snow, lousy agriculture, and the babes are >> all wrapped in sealskins and they eat whale blubber. Let's vote." >> >> Gee, why do you think so many people ended up south of our border? > >You're just fortunate that the French like women wrapped in whale blubber. I thought they liked all women, the whale blubber was just a side benefit. JF |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time for new BC | Ken | Gear | 2 | 03-27-2007 12:46 AM |
| Time for a bit of fun | Dave Appleby | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 19 | 03-26-2007 11:48 PM |
| where does the time go? | Don | Divers Hangout | 121 | 03-26-2007 08:09 PM |
| Re: Bush approval rating slumps to all-time low | Popeye | Finland | 15 | 03-26-2007 07:44 PM |
| Re: Bush approval rating slumps to all-time low | Star | Finland | 2 | 03-26-2007 07:40 PM |