Re: Bush approval rating slumps to all-time low

"Popeye" <Popeye@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message
news:11nrv6fml76bh09@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:TSjff.71073$ty1.34235@bignews1.bellsouth.net. ..
> > "Salty" wrote
> >
> >> The connection between Dubya and Tricky Dick losing their approval
rating
> >> . . .
> >
> > Back when Nixon was in office, we still believed Presidents were
supposed
> > to obey the law. Clinton changed that.
> >
> >>But hey... maybe we don't have to be that stupid as they were with the
> >>Vietnam War and wait that long
> >> to speak out against it. Maybe we need to speak out now against the
Iraq
> >> War.
> >
> > "We" spoke out against Viet Nam from the first day "we" became aware
that
> > we had troops fighting there. At least partly as a result of that, the
US
> > took the first defeat in war ever in her history. I don't know if we
> > belong in Iraq or not, but since we're there, I figure we might as well
> > finish what we started. Thousands of people dead is a shame. Thousands
> > of people dead for no gain is worse.
>
>
>
> > This morning, some Republican was on TV talking about how we had
succeeded
> > because Sadaam was captured and is in prison. I could not help but
think,
> > "That's nice, but wasn't Osama the one we most wanted to apprehend?"
>
> We wanted both.
>
> Why does it always have to be one or the other?
>
> Our chances of catching a multimillionaire international terrorist with
> multimillionaire family and multimillionaire friends, that has his own
> international terror network (that includes several nations), have always
> been tenuous at best.
>
> He's probably hiding out at Century City.
>
> Hussein, with no money, no friends, and the military prowess of Wiley
> Coyote was always a sure bet.
>
> Of course we invaded Iraq, and that's exactly why.
>
> To put on a show for the American people.

One that the Democrats demanded, when it they could make it appear that Bush
was doing nothing (after Clinton did nothing for 8 years), and right up
until it looked like invading Iraq would be viewed as a Republican success.

Now they are doing everything they can to turn it into a loss, strictly on
partisan angst.

http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/111505.wmv

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
newst6dnbOC6LFsZeDenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@wavecable.co m...
> "Salty" <babette7401@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1132289720.759637.217580@g49g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
>> Oh please. You've lost your mind. There is no way that Hillarass
>> would become Pres. I'm not sure how you connected your dots from Idiot
>> George Dubya to get to Hillarass but, trust me, you're looking at the
>> wrong puzzle.
>
> Wont stop the liberal brain surgeons that pollute the Democrat Party from
> running her, thereby assuring another Republican victory, almost no matter
> who they run.

Hillary has a better chance than Dean.

Sooner or later, someone's gonna have to tell him he ain't going to the
prom, and it won't be pretty.



>
>

"Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message
newst6dnbOC6LFsZeDenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@wavecable.co m...

> Wont stop the liberal brain surgeons that pollute the Democrat Party from
> running her, thereby assuring another Republican victory, almost no matter
> who they run.

Not if they run Rice or Jeb Bush, according to the polls. I haven't seen a
Giuliani-Clinton matchup, but he's got baggage and limited experience.
McCain would beat her, but he'll never win the Republican primary.

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:%Ujff.71074$ty1.8843@bignews1.bellsouth.net.. .
> On the other hand, there are probably some Army Corps of Engineers people
> that should be lined up against the levees they built and shot.

There's been talk lately about it not necessarily being a design problem
with the levees... Something about substandard materials and such from the
Louisiana companies doing the actual work... In other words, business as
usual in the 3rd world country affectionately known as Louisiana...

Grumman-581 wrote :
"Lee Bell" wrote in message
> As bad as everything that has happened may be, Hillary
> as President would be worse.

I wonder if she would be able to keep her skirt zipped... <snicker>
-----------------------------------------

Ewww. Who would want her to unzip it ??

Grumman-581wrote:

There's been talk lately about it not necessarily being a design
problem
with the levees... Something about substandard materials and such from
the
Louisiana companies doing the actual work... In other words, business
as
usual in the 3rd world country affectionately known as Louisiana...
------------------------------------

Forget about the talk about design problems. Forget about the talk
about substandard materials. The focus should be on this very easy to
comprehend fact :

We are insane to build anything on the shoreline (above sea level or
below sea level) when we can't master playing God 24/7 against normal
weather patterns or against extreme weather patterns like a hurricane
in order to protect it.

That's it. Bottom line.

Forget New Orleans. Knock the remainder down and build elsewhere. We
been thumbing our nose to the forces of weather for a long time on most
of the Eastern Coast. We're on borrowed time. Can you imagine a
hurricane catagory 4 or 5 hitting Atlantic City, NJ or Long Island, NY
?? It's not out of the question. Why are we trying to pretend that
we're capable of defeating nature's forces ?? Sheer stupidity is the
one reason that seems prevalent.

I just wanted everyone to see this again.

"Salty" <babette7401@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1132402243.756605.3670@o13g2000cwo.googlegrou ps.com...
> Our chances of catching a multimillionaire international terrorist with
>
> multimillionaire family and multimillionaire friends, that has his own
> international terror network (that includes several nations) have
> nothing to do with stopping terror because his followers will continue
> his work. They educate their children in their terror plans. Killing
> them won't do a thing except fuel the hatred for us that their children
> feel and thus justify their children's actions against us.
>
> Hussein was a target because, as Bush clearly whined like the idiot
> child that he is, "He tried to kill my daddy."
>
> The reason we invaded Iraq is because Bush was mad about his daddy and
> it had nothing at all to do with 9-11 since the ppl involved with 9-11
> were all from Iran, not from Iraq.
>
> The reason we invaded Iraq is also to deflect the American public's
> attention away from the fact that Bush and Cheney have powerful rich
> friends from Iran who have combined their investments from oil and
> defense contracts.
>
> The fact that some ignorant Americans are satisfied by believing that
> they are getting a 'show' put on for them by their government just
> speaks to their own stupidity. They are the ones losing their sons and
> daughters over there. Their kids are being killed. Our government
> leaders DO NOT have sons and daughters on the front lines risking to
> get killed. You most certainly will not see them sending their
> children there. In their eyes, you're a drone and you and your
> children are expendable. In fact, they wouldn't even go to war
> themselves. That piece of shit Vice President Cheney had how many
> deferments ?? Yet he's critical of others ... and the reason he's
> critical is because any lessening of the war effort will impact his
> company. He doesn't give a hoot about you. He cares about the money
> in his pockets. Our oil prices went thru the roof this year and its
> not because of hurricanes, etc. That's an excuse. It's no accident that
> oil prices rose. Bush got his money from oil. His family owns oil
> wells in Texas. Connect the god damn dots and wake up.
>

"Salty" <babette7401@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1132402641.769092.49800@g49g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> Per Scott :
>
> And I, for one, would prefer people learn to take care of themselves
> and
> stop depending upon the government for handouts.
> --------------------------------
>
> We were talking about Katrina. Please clarify. You expect the ppl...
> all several hundred thousand of them.... to clean up tremendous debris
> from their entire city, to find their dead in flood waters and
> demolished houses, get back on their feet, etc... all without any
> help from the government ?? You want them to do this all on their own
> ??

From another of your posts a couple down in the thread:

> Forget New Orleans. Knock the remainder down and build elsewhere. We
> been thumbing our nose to the forces of weather for a long time on most
> of the Eastern Coast. We're on borrowed time. Can you imagine a
> hurricane catagory 4 or 5 hitting Atlantic City, NJ or Long Island, NY
> ?? It's not out of the question. Why are we trying to pretend that
> we're capable of defeating nature's forces ?? Sheer stupidity is the
> one reason that seems prevalent.

Popeye said:

I just wanted everyone to see this again.

--------------

Thank you. I'm glad you see the light.

Popeye pulled a full ADHD :

<snicker>

But of course, you don't bother to try to comprehend. Status quo for
you.
<majorily large snicker>