I thought there were only nice people to the north

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:09:05 -0500, "Lee Bell"
<pleebell@bellsouth.net> wrote:


>
>> I don't give a damn if you carry around a bazooka and have shoot-outs
>> every day. Go for it. It's your right.
>
>Tell John.

I don't care if you carry a bazooka around. I trust you. It's the
folks yer selling yer tripe to that concern me.

JF

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:diu0m3ltd3q0e52nuuqall7q4lv6cjf1ek@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:07:43 -0600, "Chris Guynn"
> <chris.guynn@gamil.com> wrote:
>
>>Fosters: Australian for bad beer.
>>
> We were able to buy Swans for a while here. Even it was better.

nice bird but the beer is Swan. Now owned by Lion Natham and is losing it's
regional taste. Seems as the big boys take over the taste starts to become
neutral to suit all tastes.Same with West End a not bad Sth Aus beer even
XXXX ( called that because Queenslanders can't spell beer)

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:26:43 -0800, "Scott"
<pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:475f01bf$0$25567$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>> >> However, this was only the first trial. He's being tried for more
>> >> murders.
>> >
>> > You people don't execute murderers, not even heinous murders like this
>> > creep, you give them three hots and a cot.
>>
>> That's what they do in civilised countries
>
>And what we do in civilized America is ensure that you and the Canadians
>remain free.

From who?

JF

On Dec 12, 3:04 pm, Mike from Ottawa <mev at tikaCANOE dot ca> wrote:

> Wow, I guess you just don't realise that prostitutes work alone.
> Either you believe junky hookers should be armed or they should have
> armed chaperones. Which is it? If it's armed chaperones, then you
> must want some kind of legalised and regulated prostitution. Cool.

Just provide free handguns to all their pimps. That way, when the
pimps aren't using their guns to protect their stable, they can use
them to smack the girls around and keep them in line, or to fire some
warning shots at any encroaching competition.

> But aren't your violent crime stats much higher than most, if not all,
> western nations? Why is that?

I advise you not to try arguing statistics with Lee. He pulls numbers
of his ass based on some NRA article he read or some mass e-mail he
received (and later disproved on Scopes). Whenever I've cited genuine
U.S. government-issued statistics that directly contradict his
assertions, he ignores them and puts me in his killfile. You wouldn't
want him to killfile you now, would you?

"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eku0m3htmshfs3refuigvqjvuact0qpclk@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>
>
> >Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>
> Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
> advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
> or admit you just lied for effect.

Before you start demanding references from folks, don;t you think it'd be a
good idea if you provided the ones you've been asked for, but ignored?

Dennis

JOF wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>
>
> Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
> advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
> or admit you just lied for effect.
>
> JF

Look up your own posts. You advocate confiscation of weapons with
automatic loading mechanisms, "high rates of fire", That are "too
powerful" "scary looking" and confiscation from those who you feel don't
need them.



What else could I believe?

If I am wrong, feel free to correct my interpretation of your ramblings
over the years. Make a statement as to what you really mean and believe.

Else I will have to continue to infer your beliefs from your statements.



--
“TANSTAAFL”
__________________________________________________ __________________________

America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American.
__________________________________________________ __________________________
"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3

"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
news:AO6dndh6mrwXKf3anZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

> Look up your own posts. You advocate confiscation of weapons with
> automatic loading mechanisms, "high rates of fire", That are "too
> powerful" "scary looking" and confiscation from those who you feel don't
> need them.
>
> What else could I believe?
>
> If I am wrong, feel free to correct my interpretation of your ramblings
> over the years. Make a statement as to what you really mean and believe.
>
> Else I will have to continue to infer your beliefs from your statements.

Good luck with that.

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:39:27 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

>"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:eku0m3htmshfs3refuigvqjvuact0qpclk@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>>
>> Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
>> advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
>> or admit you just lied for effect.
>
>Before you start demanding references from folks, don;t you think it'd be a
>good idea if you provided the ones you've been asked for, but ignored?

Your evasion speaks volumes. Did you lie deliberately or was it
innocent misrepresentation?

JF

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:26:50 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
<dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:

>JOF wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>>
>>
>> Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
>> advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
>> or admit you just lied for effect.
>>
>> JF
>
>Look up your own posts. You advocate confiscation of weapons with
>automatic loading mechanisms, "high rates of fire", That are "too
>powerful" "scary looking" and confiscation from those who you feel don't
>need them.
>
>
>
>What else could I believe?
>
>If I am wrong, feel free to correct my interpretation of your ramblings
>over the years. Make a statement as to what you really mean and believe.
>
>Else I will have to continue to infer your beliefs from your statements.

How many times do I have to say this and have it ignored?

I absolutely do believe that certain kinds of weapons have no place in
any kind of civilized society other than as weapons of war and perhaps
law enforcement.

I absolutely believe that certain kinds of people should be restricted
from possessing guns of any kind to any reasonably enforceable extent.

I have absolutely never said that guns generally should be banned
and/or confiscated.

Your lawmakers seem to agree with me.

This is not to say that several pro-gun folks here haven't [ersisted
in attributing these things to me, but that's all you'll find no
matter how diligently you search the archives - lies and
misrepresentations by the favoured few. It's the classic situation of
something being said often enough that it finally starts to ressemble
the truth. In short, some of you have lied so many times about this
that you're tricked yerselves into believing the lie.

How much clearer can I say that?

JF

"Grumman-581" <grumman581-rec-scuba@spambob.net> wrote in message
newsan.2007.12.12.21.26.10.219000@spambob.net...
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:07:43 -0600, Chris Guynn wrote:
>
> > Fosters: Australian for bad beer.
>
> Have you tried their Fosters Bitter?
>

So far, I've only ever found one beer that I thought was reasonably
tolerable.

It's a strawberry pale ale that's brewed in a microbrewery in Alpine, TX.

I call it a microbrewery, but nanobrewery might be more accurate. As I
understand it, they only have two beers breweing at any given moment and
then only 250 gallons of each.

It's probably the next step up from cooking the mash on the stove in your
home.