I thought there were only nice people to the north

On Dec 13, 10:32 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
wrote:
> <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:872a751e-35e5-44a3-a995-3818751cca1e@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 9:39 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > > "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:eku0m3htmshfs3refuigvqjvuact0qpclk@4ax.com.. .
>
> > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> > > > <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>
> > > > >Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>
> > > > Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
> > > > advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
> > > > or admit you just lied for effect.
>
> > > Before you start demanding references from folks, don;t you think it'd
> be a
> > > good idea if you provided the ones you've been asked for, but ignored?
>
> > > Dennis
>
> > No. It would not in this instance. STFU.
>
> No. Try using a killfile or setitng up ignore rules if you don't care to see
> my posts.
>
>
> Dennis- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Who said I don't care to see them ? I like getting a laugh out of
what you babble.

On Dec 13, 7:15 pm, JOF <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:23:25 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>
>
>
>
>
> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
> >JOF wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:26:50 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> >> <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>
> >>>JOF wrote:
>
> >>>>On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> >>>><dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>
> >>>>Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
> >>>>advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
> >>>>or admit you just lied for effect.
>
> >>>>JF
>
> >>>Look up your own posts. You advocate confiscation of weapons with
> >>>automatic loading mechanisms, "high rates of fire", That are "too
> >>>powerful" "scary looking" and confiscation from those who you feel don't
> >>>need them.
>
> >>>What else could I believe?
>
> >>>If I am wrong, feel free to correct my interpretation of your ramblings
> >>>over the years. Make a statement as to what you really mean and believe.
>
> >>>Else I will have to continue to infer your beliefs from your statements.
>
> >> How many times do I have to say this and have it ignored?
>
> >As long as you later make statements that refute it.
>
> ???
>
> >> I absolutely do believe that certain kinds of weapons have no place in
> >> any kind of civilized society other than as weapons of war and perhaps
> >> law enforcement.
>
> >Like pistols that carry more than your current (and it seems to change)
> >feeling regarding the needed number of rounds.
>
> Did I ever state a cycling rate limitation? What did I change from
> nothing?
>
> >Like pistols with "too high a rate of fire"
>
> Yer point being?
>
> >Pistols with what is commonly called 'automatic action"
>
> Yer point
>
> >> I absolutely believe that certain kinds of people should be restricted
> >> from possessing guns of any kind to any reasonably enforceable extent.
>
> >Yet you never can make a statement that is clear regarding exactly *WHO*
> >those "kinds of people" are. Then you paint all gun owners as savage
> >psychopaths.
>
> >> I have absolutely never said that guns generally should be banned
> >> and/or confiscated.
>
> >Perhaps not. But you have said that *some* should be, and that *some*
> >people (specifically those who you feel are dangerous, and have included
> >gun owners in that group) shouldn't have the right to carry.
>
> And thats inconsistent how (my keyboard has voluntarily reverted to
> french and makes funny things outa question marks & apostrophes. Ill
> fix it later.
>
> >> Your lawmakers seem to agree with me.
>
> >Fewer and fewer each year.
>
> Is that a yes or a no
>
> >> This is not to say that several pro-gun folks here haven't [ersisted
> >> in attributing these things to me, but that's all you'll find no
> >> matter how diligently you search the archives - lies and
> >> misrepresentations by the favoured few. It's the classic situation of
> >> something being said often enough that it finally starts to ressemble
> >> the truth. In short, some of you have lied so many times about this
> >> that you're tricked yerselves into believing the lie.
>
> >When have I lied? I have taken your words and applied them.
>
> >> How much clearer can I say that?
>
> >You can't. But you aren't consistent either. Chances are, you'll
> >contradict these words in less than 30 days, unless you stop posting...
>
> Be sure to point it out to me.
>
> JF- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Oh he will try. Diapered and Constipated or Denying and Confounded
or Deranged and Confabulated or whatever you want to call him /
her / it is a true class A idiot.

hierophantfish@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Dec 11, 9:20 am, dazed and confuzzed <dedmann@comcast_remove.net>
> wrote:
>
>>JOF wrote:
>>
>>>So 'splain this one Lucy. I am continually told that no one is trying
>>>to force guns on us non-gun types throats, but how else is one to
>>>interpret this latest post of yours. Certainly it's couched in concern
>>>for my safety, but isn't it a sales pitch for more guns?
>>
>>>JF
>>
>>I would say that it is a sales pitch for choice.
>
>
> But you, Diapered and Constipated, do not have a brain.
and you, fishie, have proven that yours does not work.

--
“TANSTAAFL”
__________________________________________________ __________________________

America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American.
__________________________________________________ __________________________
"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3

hierophantfish@hotmail.com wrote:

> On Dec 13, 7:15 pm, JOF <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:23:25 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>><dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>>
>>>JOF wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:26:50 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>>>><dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>JOF wrote:
>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
>>>>>><dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
>>
>>>>>>Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I ever
>>>>>>advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce it
>>>>>>or admit you just lied for effect.
>>
>>>>>>JF
>>
>>>>>Look up your own posts. You advocate confiscation of weapons with
>>>>>automatic loading mechanisms, "high rates of fire", That are "too
>>>>>powerful" "scary looking" and confiscation from those who you feel don't
>>>>>need them.
>>
>>>>>What else could I believe?
>>
>>>>>If I am wrong, feel free to correct my interpretation of your ramblings
>>>>>over the years. Make a statement as to what you really mean and believe.
>>
>>>>>Else I will have to continue to infer your beliefs from your statements.
>>
>>>>How many times do I have to say this and have it ignored?
>>
>>>As long as you later make statements that refute it.
>>
>>???
>>
>>
>>>>I absolutely do believe that certain kinds of weapons have no place in
>>>>any kind of civilized society other than as weapons of war and perhaps
>>>>law enforcement.
>>
>>>Like pistols that carry more than your current (and it seems to change)
>>>feeling regarding the needed number of rounds.
>>
>>Did I ever state a cycling rate limitation? What did I change from
>>nothing?
>>
>>
>>>Like pistols with "too high a rate of fire"
>>
>>Yer point being?
>>
>>
>>>Pistols with what is commonly called 'automatic action"
>>
>>Yer point
>>
>>
>>>>I absolutely believe that certain kinds of people should be restricted
>>>>from possessing guns of any kind to any reasonably enforceable extent.
>>
>>>Yet you never can make a statement that is clear regarding exactly *WHO*
>>>those "kinds of people" are. Then you paint all gun owners as savage
>>>psychopaths.
>>
>>>>I have absolutely never said that guns generally should be banned
>>>>and/or confiscated.
>>
>>>Perhaps not. But you have said that *some* should be, and that *some*
>>>people (specifically those who you feel are dangerous, and have included
>>>gun owners in that group) shouldn't have the right to carry.
>>
>>And thats inconsistent how (my keyboard has voluntarily reverted to
>>french and makes funny things outa question marks & apostrophes. Ill
>>fix it later.
>>
>>
>>>>Your lawmakers seem to agree with me.
>>
>>>Fewer and fewer each year.
>>
>>Is that a yes or a no
>>
>>
>>>>This is not to say that several pro-gun folks here haven't [ersisted
>>>>in attributing these things to me, but that's all you'll find no
>>>>matter how diligently you search the archives - lies and
>>>>misrepresentations by the favoured few. It's the classic situation of
>>>>something being said often enough that it finally starts to ressemble
>>>>the truth. In short, some of you have lied so many times about this
>>>>that you're tricked yerselves into believing the lie.
>>
>>>When have I lied? I have taken your words and applied them.
>>
>>>>How much clearer can I say that?
>>
>>>You can't. But you aren't consistent either. Chances are, you'll
>>>contradict these words in less than 30 days, unless you stop posting...
>>
>>Be sure to point it out to me.
>>
>>JF- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> Oh he will try. Diapered and Constipated or Denying and Confounded
> or Deranged and Confabulated or whatever you want to call him /
> her / it is a true class A idiot.

Have you considered lobotomy as a treatment for you issues?

--
“TANSTAAFL”
__________________________________________________ __________________________

America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American.
__________________________________________________ __________________________
"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3

<hierophantfish@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4d394a6-7fb1-4b22-8ce2-54799af1130a@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 13, 10:32 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> wrote:
> > <hierophantf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> >
news:872a751e-35e5-44a3-a995-3818751cca1e@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 12, 9:39 pm, "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkm...@ever.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > > "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:eku0m3htmshfs3refuigvqjvuact0qpclk@4ax.com.. .
> >
> > > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:25:02 -0600, dazed and confuzzed
> > > > > <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >Because JOF advocates disarming everyone, Us citizens included?
> >
> > > > > Your lack of comprehension is world class. Where and when have I
ever
> > > > > advocated disarming everyone. I gotta see a cite on that. Produce
it
> > > > > or admit you just lied for effect.
> >
> > > > Before you start demanding references from folks, don;t you think
it'd
> > be a
> > > > good idea if you provided the ones you've been asked for, but
ignored?
> >
> > > > Dennis
> >
> > > No. It would not in this instance. STFU.
> >
> > No. Try using a killfile or setitng up ignore rules if you don't care to
see
> > my posts.
> >
> >
> > Dennis- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Who said I don't care to see them ? I like getting a laugh out of
> what you babble.

Really, then why did you tell me to STFU?
Typically this is an acronym for "Shut The Fuck Up"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STFU
Perhaps you meant something different, though I somehow doubt you were
talking about the Southern Tenants Farmers Union.

Dennis

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:26:17 -0800 (PST), Greg Mossman
<mossman@qnet.com> wrote:

>On Dec 12, 3:04 pm, Mike from Ottawa <mev at tikaCANOE dot ca> wrote:
>
>> Wow, I guess you just don't realise that prostitutes work alone.
>> Either you believe junky hookers should be armed or they should have
>> armed chaperones. Which is it? If it's armed chaperones, then you
>> must want some kind of legalised and regulated prostitution. Cool.
>
>Just provide free handguns to all their pimps. That way, when the
>pimps aren't using their guns to protect their stable, they can use
>them to smack the girls around and keep them in line, or to fire some
>warning shots at any encroaching competition.

In Canada, pimps are called "chaperones" -- it's just because we're so
nice.

>> But aren't your violent crime stats much higher than most, if not all,
>> western nations? Why is that?
>
>I advise you not to try arguing statistics with Lee. He pulls numbers
>of his ass based on some NRA article he read or some mass e-mail he
>received (and later disproved on Scopes). Whenever I've cited genuine
>U.S. government-issued statistics that directly contradict his
>assertions, he ignores them and puts me in his killfile. You wouldn't
>want him to killfile you now, would you?

That would be just okey-dokey by me. And I wish you guys would stop
bringing up the image of a crusty old, miserable red-neck in a speedo;
that's just such a terrible image and has given me nightmares.

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:25:17 -0500, JOF <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:26:43 -0800, "Scott"
><pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dechucka" <dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:475f01bf$0$25567$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>>> >> However, this was only the first trial. He's being tried for more
>>> >> murders.
>>> >
>>> > You people don't execute murderers, not even heinous murders like this
>>> > creep, you give them three hots and a cot.
>>>
>>> That's what they do in civilised countries
>>
>>And what we do in civilized America is ensure that you and the Canadians
>>remain free.
>
>From who?

....from fair trade practices.

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:17:55 -0500, JOF <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:30:13 -0500, Mike from Ottawa <mev at tikaCANOE
>dot ca> wrote:
>
<snip>
>>I've had Guinness in Ireland -- those sly ones keep the best stuff at
>>home. I tried it again in England, Wales & Scotland, but it just
>>didn't taste the same. Ditto for this continent. Now that I've been
>>spoiled, I usually can't face a Guinness here.
>
>The flavour is like licking stainless steel.

No way. You've got to take a trip to Eire and try their Guinness.
Extraordinary.

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:25:11 +1100, "dechucka"
<dechucka@vomithotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:diu0m3ltd3q0e52nuuqall7q4lv6cjf1ek@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:07:43 -0600, "Chris Guynn"
>> <chris.guynn@gamil.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Fosters: Australian for bad beer.
>>>
>> We were able to buy Swans for a while here. Even it was better.
>
>nice bird but the beer is Swan. Now owned by Lion Natham and is losing it's
>regional taste. Seems as the big boys take over the taste starts to become
>neutral to suit all tastes.Same with West End a not bad Sth Aus beer even
>XXXX ( called that because Queenslanders can't spell beer)

I spent most of my time there around Perth, and really got to like Emu
Export. Does that still exist? It was 30 years ago (cheerist, I'm
aging myself).

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:06:39 -0600, dazed and confuzzed wrote:

> Have you considered lobotomy as a treatment for you issues?

That would be assuming something, wouldn't it?