|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com... > 2 Checked bags 50lbs each for coach, 70lbs each for First & BC. I took a > 3rd > checked bag (the Ikelite Underwater housing Pellican case) and had to pay > $60.00 extra outbound. > I had to hagle with the check in agent as the 22" carryon weighed over > 30lbs and she almost > refused it. I think since I volunteered to pay for the 3rd checked bag she > let it go. On the return > flight the gate agent gave me a freebe on the 3rd checked bag since I was > in BC. I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a 737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? On the walk to the plane, I simply ripped off the pink tag, and then carried the bag up the stairs and onboard without a hitch. > Here I had to check 4 bags (including the standard 22" carryon) for a > total of US$140.00 round > trip, including a 5 Kilo discount for bringing SCUBA equipment (1 of the 2 > big checked bags) and > a 30% overall discount for a round trip payment. Only my laptop was > allowed as a carryon. > But nonetheless, I got to carry it all. I just had to pay for it. > I gather that's the objection (ie. paying extra)? Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com... > 2 Checked bags 50lbs each for coach, 70lbs each for First & BC. I took a > 3rd > checked bag (the Ikelite Underwater housing Pellican case) and had to pay > $60.00 extra outbound. > I had to hagle with the check in agent as the 22" carryon weighed over > 30lbs and she almost > refused it. I think since I volunteered to pay for the 3rd checked bag she > let it go. On the return > flight the gate agent gave me a freebe on the 3rd checked bag since I was > in BC. I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a 737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? On the walk to the plane, I simply ripped off the pink tag, and then carried the bag up the stairs and onboard without a hitch. > Here I had to check 4 bags (including the standard 22" carryon) for a > total of US$140.00 round > trip, including a 5 Kilo discount for bringing SCUBA equipment (1 of the 2 > big checked bags) and > a 30% overall discount for a round trip payment. Only my laptop was > allowed as a carryon. > But nonetheless, I got to carry it all. I just had to pay for it. > I gather that's the objection (ie. paying extra)? Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com... > 2 Checked bags 50lbs each for coach, 70lbs each for First & BC. I took a > 3rd > checked bag (the Ikelite Underwater housing Pellican case) and had to pay > $60.00 extra outbound. > I had to hagle with the check in agent as the 22" carryon weighed over > 30lbs and she almost > refused it. I think since I volunteered to pay for the 3rd checked bag she > let it go. On the return > flight the gate agent gave me a freebe on the 3rd checked bag since I was > in BC. I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a 737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? On the walk to the plane, I simply ripped off the pink tag, and then carried the bag up the stairs and onboard without a hitch. > Here I had to check 4 bags (including the standard 22" carryon) for a > total of US$140.00 round > trip, including a 5 Kilo discount for bringing SCUBA equipment (1 of the 2 > big checked bags) and > a 30% overall discount for a round trip payment. Only my laptop was > allowed as a carryon. > But nonetheless, I got to carry it all. I just had to pay for it. > I gather that's the objection (ie. paying extra)? Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:46:22 -0700, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote: >"mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com.. . > >I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are >within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the >gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my >wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a >video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a >737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? Similar equipment for mine (the DC310, the DCR-TRV280, dive computer and the Analox OE II) plus a few odds/ends. It just tipped at over 31lbs and I gather she saw me try to lift it and then said "please put it on the scale." Lesson learned: roll it in their presence. After I told her I'd pay for the Pellican case containing the Ikelite housing, she then gave me a pink "cabin baggage" tag for the carry on. No problems. Oddly enough, the PPT check in agent didn't even weigh the carry on. >Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's >already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make >a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go >to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This >happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I >barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially >increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. I also pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they make me "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA equipment bag (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the domestic trips. We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this time to Palau on CO. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:46:22 -0700, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote: >"mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com.. . > >I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are >within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the >gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my >wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a >video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a >737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? Similar equipment for mine (the DC310, the DCR-TRV280, dive computer and the Analox OE II) plus a few odds/ends. It just tipped at over 31lbs and I gather she saw me try to lift it and then said "please put it on the scale." Lesson learned: roll it in their presence. After I told her I'd pay for the Pellican case containing the Ikelite housing, she then gave me a pink "cabin baggage" tag for the carry on. No problems. Oddly enough, the PPT check in agent didn't even weigh the carry on. >Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's >already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make >a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go >to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This >happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I >barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially >increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. I also pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they make me "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA equipment bag (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the domestic trips. We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this time to Palau on CO. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:46:22 -0700, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote: >"mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com.. . > >I really hate when they randomly tag carryons that, except for weight, are >within limits. As we were boarding our flight out of Provo on Saturday, the >gate agent, without saying a word, slyly stuck a pink gate claim on my >wheeled carryon, handing me the stub. Yeah, right. That bag contained a >video camera and both our regs/computers, and we were sitting up front on a >737 with plenty of overhead space. What gives? Similar equipment for mine (the DC310, the DCR-TRV280, dive computer and the Analox OE II) plus a few odds/ends. It just tipped at over 31lbs and I gather she saw me try to lift it and then said "please put it on the scale." Lesson learned: roll it in their presence. After I told her I'd pay for the Pellican case containing the Ikelite housing, she then gave me a pink "cabin baggage" tag for the carry on. No problems. Oddly enough, the PPT check in agent didn't even weigh the carry on. >Actually I don't mind paying extra if that's all that's involved. It's >already an expensive trip, so another couple hundred bucks isn't gonna make >a serious difference in the total cost. What I fear is the time when I go >to check in my overweight luggage and they refuse to take it, period. This >happened to me once on a Continental flight out of Quito on a 737 when I >barely exceeded the 70 lb limit on one bag, and my fears exponentially >increase as the size of the aircraft and the weight limits decrease. I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. I also pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they make me "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA equipment bag (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the domestic trips. We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this time to Palau on CO. ____________________________________________ Regards, Arnold |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:n71bg2943s227tjkigorn191ufud0hfa84@4ax.com... > I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. > I also > pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they > make me > "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA > equipment bag > (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the > domestic trips. > > We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this > time to Palau > on CO. Continental is among the most generous of airlines as far as baggage is concerned. They allow 70 lbs x 2 for all elite-status mileage plan members, and 70 x 3 for first class. My situation was specific to Ecuador, which had a luggage embargo in place that somehow restricted my bag even though I was prepared to pay the normal $100 charge for the 70-100 lb category. Next year I should make platinum with Continental, so we won't likely encounter this problem again - especially since I don't plan to bring both open circuit gear and a Draeger Dolphin complete with tank and pony this time along with my camera. Our normal plan is two hard clamshell bags for our dive gear, a Pelican with the camera housing and lights/strobes, and a duffel for clothes & toiletries, plus carryons as needed/allowed for the camera itself, regs/computers, log books, medications, and other absolute necessaries. Each of the four bags weighs under 50 lbs, so we're fine without the Continental perks and on any U.S.-based carrier domestic or international. If I upgrade to first-class with miles, which I'll almost definitely do, we might bring another bag for a couple nice outfits for dining in Quito if I'm certain that they'll honor the free extra bag out of Ecuador - I'll call ahead to be certain. The duffel works fine for liveaboard clothes and is great for storing, but it's hardly the best way to keep nice duds wrinkle free. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:n71bg2943s227tjkigorn191ufud0hfa84@4ax.com... > I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. > I also > pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they > make me > "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA > equipment bag > (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the > domestic trips. > > We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this > time to Palau > on CO. Continental is among the most generous of airlines as far as baggage is concerned. They allow 70 lbs x 2 for all elite-status mileage plan members, and 70 x 3 for first class. My situation was specific to Ecuador, which had a luggage embargo in place that somehow restricted my bag even though I was prepared to pay the normal $100 charge for the 70-100 lb category. Next year I should make platinum with Continental, so we won't likely encounter this problem again - especially since I don't plan to bring both open circuit gear and a Draeger Dolphin complete with tank and pony this time along with my camera. Our normal plan is two hard clamshell bags for our dive gear, a Pelican with the camera housing and lights/strobes, and a duffel for clothes & toiletries, plus carryons as needed/allowed for the camera itself, regs/computers, log books, medications, and other absolute necessaries. Each of the four bags weighs under 50 lbs, so we're fine without the Continental perks and on any U.S.-based carrier domestic or international. If I upgrade to first-class with miles, which I'll almost definitely do, we might bring another bag for a couple nice outfits for dining in Quito if I'm certain that they'll honor the free extra bag out of Ecuador - I'll call ahead to be certain. The duffel works fine for liveaboard clothes and is great for storing, but it's hardly the best way to keep nice duds wrinkle free. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:n71bg2943s227tjkigorn191ufud0hfa84@4ax.com... > I weigh my bags before I go and pack accordingly. So far, I've been lucky. > I also > pack a spare empty canvas gear bag in one of the checked bags in case they > make me > "re-distribute" later. Haven't had to yet. Fortunately, the SCUBA > equipment bag > (given my current configuration) is just under 50lbs so it can make the > domestic trips. > > We'll see how it goes next year when I have to take all I took to PPT this > time to Palau > on CO. Continental is among the most generous of airlines as far as baggage is concerned. They allow 70 lbs x 2 for all elite-status mileage plan members, and 70 x 3 for first class. My situation was specific to Ecuador, which had a luggage embargo in place that somehow restricted my bag even though I was prepared to pay the normal $100 charge for the 70-100 lb category. Next year I should make platinum with Continental, so we won't likely encounter this problem again - especially since I don't plan to bring both open circuit gear and a Draeger Dolphin complete with tank and pony this time along with my camera. Our normal plan is two hard clamshell bags for our dive gear, a Pelican with the camera housing and lights/strobes, and a duffel for clothes & toiletries, plus carryons as needed/allowed for the camera itself, regs/computers, log books, medications, and other absolute necessaries. Each of the four bags weighs under 50 lbs, so we're fine without the Continental perks and on any U.S.-based carrier domestic or international. If I upgrade to first-class with miles, which I'll almost definitely do, we might bring another bag for a couple nice outfits for dining in Quito if I'm certain that they'll honor the free extra bag out of Ecuador - I'll call ahead to be certain. The duffel works fine for liveaboard clothes and is great for storing, but it's hardly the best way to keep nice duds wrinkle free. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| It all depends on how booked the flight is. If the flight isn't very full, they won't charge you. Dave "mag3" <zmpmag3-plongee@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:56r8g2hev9lq7kasfmvqb1qj2fg9kki7ja@4ax.com... > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:46:48 -0700, "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> > wrote: > >>No, it's Air Tahiti. Air Tahiti Nui is the international carrier and I >>didn't think their luggage limits were a problem. > > 2 Checked bags 50lbs each for coach, 70lbs each for First & BC. I took a > 3rd > checked bag (the Ikelite Underwater housing Pellican case) and had to pay > $60.00 extra outbound. > I had to hagle with the check in agent as the 22" carryon weighed over > 30lbs and she almost > refused it. I think since I volunteered to pay for the 3rd checked bag she > let it go. On the return > flight the gate agent gave me a freebe on the 3rd checked bag since I was > in BC. > >>Air Tahiti is the >>regional island hopper and it's a 20 kilo limit as far as I recall. >>You're >>stuck with Air Tahiti getting to any island other than Tahiti, except for >>the ferry to Moorea and the cruiseships that you favor. > > Here I had to check 4 bags (including the standard 22" carryon) for a > total of US$140.00 round > trip, including a 5 Kilo discount for bringing SCUBA equipment (1 of the 2 > big checked bags) and > a 30% overall discount for a round trip payment. Only my laptop was > allowed as a carryon. > > But nonetheless, I got to carry it all. I just had to pay for it. > > I gather that's the objection (ie. paying extra)? > > > > ____________________________________________ > Regards, > > Arnold |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moregallo no limits!!! | Angelo | (Italian) | 38 | 04-11-2007 01:15 PM |
| Tahiti | Dillon Pyron | French Polynesia | 7 | 03-26-2007 10:20 PM |
| Tahiti | Fred Anderson | French Polynesia | 2 | 03-26-2007 09:50 PM |
| Know YOUR limits, and dive WITHIN them | Reef Fish | Divers Hangout | 0 | 03-26-2007 11:42 AM |
| Tahiti | test | French Polynesia | 38 | 07-20-2006 02:16 AM |