scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Regional Travel and Dive News > Europe > France > (French)
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2007, 06:38 AM
vemfmfm@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default M-I 5`Persecuti on - MI5 Ins ist that the se Faxes mus t Cont inue


MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 31. March, 2000

22,544 Faxes Delivered in Three. Years, and Still No Breakthrough

In. the last three years I have sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients in
the UK, of which at least 13,974 have gone to Westminster. Last. weekend
alone I sent. 832 completed faxes to politicians, the media and various
others, on. the subject of MI5s mistreatment of me these last ten years.

I believe some of the recipients know of MI5s actions against me. in the
last decade;. yet they maintain strict "omerta" in fear of the security
services persecution actions. being made public.

MI5 Insist. that these Faxes must Continue

Between September 1999 and. mid-January 2000, the persecutors, whoever they
might be, mostly left me alone. I counted. only three incidents in almost
five months - which is a lower rate than at any time since. June 1990, when
this business. started.

By leaving me alone for several months, the "oppressors". were making an
implicit assurance that they would continue to leave. me alone in the
future. On 11 January I. posted to an internet newsgroup accepting what I
saw as their assurance of no. further harassment, stating that I would
cease sending these. faxes - which is the only thing I do in my defence -
if they. continued to leave me alone. And for two weeks I did indeed
refrain. from distributing these articles.

But MI5 acted in bad faith. From the last. week of January until the
beginning of. March, they resumed their hate campaign against me with a
vengeance. They even put people in my road. three times in February, one
instance of which. I recorded. They resumed their normal behaviour of
bugging my phone and house, listening to where I would. go, and then
placing. people in that location to "aggravate and annoy" me.

What MI5 did in. February is plainly a contravention of the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997, since it has caused. me "alarm and distress" as
specified in the Act. But it. is a waste of time going to the police with a
complaint, since the police have done, and will do, absolutely. nothing. I
complained to the Metropolitan. Police in 1995, and they refused to take my
complaint. When I complained again. in 1999, the detective sergeant laughed
at my complaint, with the words, "It's an absolute load. of rubbish. I
don't investigate rubbish. I can't be more blunt or to the. point than
that." It is useful to remember that the Met also. treated Stephen
Lawrences parents with similar discourtesy;. police prejudices are similar
in my case, so I can take some comfort from. that case and hope that one
day I will. get a fair hearing.

MI5 acted in bad faith, but they also acted with arrogance. They. do not
care if I. send 800 faxes every weekend, since they know I cannot prove my
claims, and the recent Shayler case shows how weak external. oversight is
of the secret services. But they acted with more than arrogance - the. MI5
agents actually. want my faxes to continue, they insist that these faxes
continue,. since my communications give them an excuse to continue their
activities, and continue in the. paid employ of the secret service. Despite
their use of diverse proxies over the last ten years, it is the. same MI5
officers behind the campaign all the time - I have. seen one of them on
three occasions in. Canada over a period of years, and it is a safe belief
that that same person continues to be paid. for his "work" in harassing me
in London now. The average cost of an MI5. employee is some 75,000 per
annum, so one may infer that their officers are amply. compensated; their
insistence that "hostilities" are maintained. is understandable when placed
in this. light.

11860


--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDem
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M'I-5,Persecuti on ' 22, 544 + 83 7 = 23,38 1 mefmemf@bigfoot.com Gear 3 12-31-2007 07:14 AM
M'I-5,Persecuti on ' 22, 544 + 83 7 = 23,38 1 mefmemf@bigfoot.com Gear 0 12-31-2007 07:05 AM
M-I'5-Persec ution - MI 5 I nsist that thes e Faxes mus t Cont inue vmfimimf@lycos.com Gear 0 12-31-2007 06:41 AM
M-I'5-Persec ution - MI 5 I nsist that thes e Faxes mus t Cont inue vmfimimf@lycos.com Gear 0 12-31-2007 06:41 AM
M-I'5-Persec ution - MI 5 I nsist that thes e Faxes mus t Cont inue vmfimimf@lycos.com Gear 0 12-31-2007 06:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.