|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Latest edition of Rodale's states that Scubpro will no longer be submitting its products for testing. Given that their products routinely test well, this was a surprise. Any coments? Dave Kaplan |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| David Kaplan wrote: > Latest edition of Rodale's states that Scubpro will no longer be submitting > its products for testing. > Given that their products routinely test well, this was a surprise. > Any coments? If Rodales wanted to maintain even the slightest shadow of credibility, they would go to various LDS and purchase the gear in question. Asking a manufacturer to provide gear for testing is fraught with possibilities of super-tweaking and over checking an item for QC. Simply- it skews the sample so badly that the results are irrelevant. This is the process in use by a far more credible publication, Consumer's Union. Unfortunately CU knows nothing about diving and their readership is looking for magic quick answers, but that hasn't stopped Rodales yet, either. -- Doc _(:)0 "I'm hiding in Honduras, I'm a desperate man, Send Lawyers, Guns & Money...The sh*t has hit the fan" -Warren Zevon |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Robert \"Doc\" Adelman, C.I.D. left this mess on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 03:17:34 GMT for The Way to clean up: > >David Kaplan wrote: >> Latest edition of Rodale's states that Scubpro will no longer be submitting >> its products for testing. >> Given that their products routinely test well, this was a surprise. >> Any coments? > >If Rodales wanted to maintain even the slightest shadow of credibility, >they would go to various LDS and purchase the gear in question. Asking a >manufacturer to provide gear for testing is fraught with possibilities >of super-tweaking and over checking an item for QC. Simply- it skews the >sample so badly that the results are irrelevant. > >This is the process in use by a far more credible publication, >Consumer's Union. Unfortunately CU knows nothing about diving and their >readership is looking for magic quick answers, but that hasn't stopped >Rodales yet, either. > On the other hand, Doc, it costs a lot of money to go out and buy not one, but several kits to test of each brand and model. CU makes a lot of money from it's various consumer products, but even after that, there's a healthy amount of fund raising they have to do. You need the redundancy because what if a shop sells them a reg that was badly stored, let's say it was a display model in a window near Ground Zero, and chock full of dust, and some nimnut forgets to clean it before putting it out? (OK, extreme example to overdramatize my point, but you get the idea) Despite that, I agree with you. Rodales should go out and pay "street", and maybe even buy from places like Leisure-Pro, so they emulate the experience the consumer has when confronted by these choices. Tao te Carl "It takes a village to have an idiot." - Carl (c) 2003 |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Robert "Doc" Adelman, C.I.D. <lawyers-guns-money@att.net> wrote: > David Kaplan wrote: > > Latest edition of Rodale's states that Scubpro will no longer be submitting > > its products for testing. > > Given that their products routinely test well, this was a surprise. > > Any coments? > > If Rodales wanted to maintain even the slightest shadow of credibility, > they would go to various LDS and purchase the gear in question. Asking a > manufacturer to provide gear for testing is fraught with possibilities > of super-tweaking and over checking an item for QC. Simply- it skews the > sample so badly that the results are irrelevant. I am sure that Rodale's has enough connections and dive shop advertisers that they could obtain equipment for testing, such as new gear destined for rental, etc. Or, if they were more enterprising, they could buy the gear at wholesale and then sell it via special auction or by posting classified ads on their bulletin board. More conspicuous by absence is the lack of reviews of "technical diving" products from Halcyon, Dive Rite, OMS, Oxycheq, Abysmal, AUL, Sartek, etc. etc. etc. (Disclaimer: I sell Halcyon, Oxycheq, etc. etc.) > This is the process in use by a far more credible publication, > Consumer's Union. Unfortunately CU knows nothing about diving and their > readership is looking for magic quick answers, but that hasn't stopped > Rodales yet, either. Unfortunately, what works for consumer durables like washing machines, etc. is lost on specialty items such as audio equipment and cameras. Having said that, CR still is the best rag around for your basic purchases. -- Matt matt@gol.com |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <1g0fw2v.vioyis1qhfz0gN@yahoobb219000172010.bbtec. net>, matt@gol.com says... > >Robert "Doc" Adelman, C.I.D. <lawyers-guns-money@att.net> wrote: > > >More conspicuous by absence is the lack of reviews of "technical diving" >products from Halcyon, Dive Rite, OMS, Oxycheq, Abysmal, AUL, Sartek, >etc. etc. etc. (Disclaimer: I sell Halcyon, Oxycheq, etc. etc.) > >> This is the process in use by a far more credible publication, >> Consumer's Union. Unfortunately CU knows nothing about diving and their >> readership is looking for magic quick answers, but that hasn't stopped >> Rodales yet, either. > >Unfortunately, what works for consumer durables like washing machines, >etc. is lost on specialty items such as audio equipment and cameras. > >Having said that, CR still is the best rag around for your basic >purchases. But the CR "model" is copied in other publications that are far more specialized. Practical Sailor is pretty much a "Consumer's Reports" for sailboats, and I believe they have a sister publication for power boats as well. Cook's Illustrated, while severely biased towards the culinary equivalent of SB Droolers (tm), does equipment reviews the same way as CR and accepts no advertising. Maybe Scubapro has seen the writing on the wall, and realizes that fewer and fewer people rely on publications like RSD to make gear choices, instead opting to ask questions on Internet discussion forums. Maybe they figure it's time to stop playing along with the bullshit charade game of "unbiased" magazine reviews. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I am just amazed that anyone reads Rodale's. They seem to always just publish crap. Give me Dive Training any day! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Scott F. Migaldi, K9PO MI-150972 PP-ASEL Are you a PADI Instructor or DM? Then join the PADI Instructor Yahoo Group at PADI-Instructors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com ----------------------------------- Catch the wave! www.hamwave.com |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| In article <binsi1$nhr$1@newshost.mot.com>, SFM <k9po@amsat.org> wrote: €I am just amazed that anyone reads Rodale's. They seem to always just €publish crap. Give me Dive Training any day! <snicker> |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vendo Pinne Scubapro TwinJet 67 - scubapro twinjey67.jpg (0/1) | rumentaioNOSPAM@libero.it | (Italian) | 21 | 04-11-2007 02:03 PM |
| X 650 scubapro | Cali | (Italian) | 0 | 04-11-2007 01:02 PM |
| ScubaPro S Tec | Jdembo | Gear | 0 | 03-27-2007 01:00 AM |
| FS: SCUBAPRO REG BAG | Garry Harding | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 03-27-2007 12:21 AM |
| Re: Scubapro MK20/MK25 kostenlose Teilerevision durch SCUBAPRO UWATEC | Matthias Römer | (German) | 0 | 06-30-2005 02:01 AM |