Backplates

> Newbies. Jesus.

You called?

Jesus wrote:
>
> > Newbies. Jesus.
>
> You called?

Jesus. Jesus.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta

"Brian Nadwidny" <nadwidny@excite.com> wrote in message
news:4150FA13.AE2ABB51@excite.com...
> Jesus wrote:
> >
> > > Newbies. Jesus.
> >
> > You called?
>
> Jesus. Jesus.

That's interesting. There's a huge Chinook here today. Coincidence?

Jammer Six wrote:
>
> In article <d908f31.0409211809.25506fad@posting.google.com> , David K
> <dlkertz@msn.com> wrote:
>
> € Jammer Six <jammer@invalid.oz.net> wrote in message
> € news:<cioapj$kor$0$216.39.146.232@theriver.com>...
> € > In article <d908f31.0409202019.5d77e69a@posting.google.com> , David K
> € > <dlkertz@msn.com> wrote:
> € >
> € > ? Jammer Six <jammer@invalid.oz.net> wrote in message
> € > ? news:<cin4s8$bkt$0$216.39.146.232@theriver.com>...
> € > ? > In article <d908f31.0409200446.71b60eb1@posting.google.com> , David K
> € > ? > <dlkertz@msn.com> wrote:
> € > ? >
> € > ? > ? > ? > ? Christ Jammer, do I have to do your work for you?
> € > ? > ? > ? >
> € > ? > ? > ? > Christ was a wannabe.
> € > ? > ? > ? >
> € > ? > ? > ? > When you're done fucking around on the net, we have some wood we
> € > ? > need
> € > ? > ? > ? > split.
> € > ? > ? > ?
> € > ? > ? > ? Diving & fucking around on the net consume all of my free time,
> € > you
> € > ? > ? > ? will need to make other arrangements for your wood.
> € > ? > ? >
> € > ? > ? > So, you're backpedaling on that "do your work for you" comment,
> € > then?
> € > ? > ?
> € > ? > ? No, it falls into the category of fucking around on the net.
> € > ? >
> € > ? > So it does.
> € > ? >
> € > ? > Do all your comments here fall in that category?
> € > ?
> € > ? I don't know, your future actions will determine the answer.
> € >
> € > We know. We were simply offering you a chance to state a preference.
> €
> € When you say "We" who are you referring to?
> €
> € Do you hear voices in your head?
>
> Newbies. Jesus.

yes father?


>
> --
> "I know we're going to die. There's three of us who are going to do something
> about it."
> -Tom Burnett, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:Me74d.68433$%S.32225@pd7tw2no...

>> Jesus. Jesus.
>
> That's interesting. There's a huge Chinook here today. Coincidence?

Huge Chinook? I thought it was the Apache's turn with you tonight.

BTW, the Santa Anas were blowing real hard here today.

"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
news:415107a3$0$105$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com...
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:Me74d.68433$%S.32225@pd7tw2no...
>
> >> Jesus. Jesus.
> >
> > That's interesting. There's a huge Chinook here today. Coincidence?
>
> Huge Chinook? I thought it was the Apache's turn with you tonight.

Now don't start that crap. Soon someone will be telling me I have to get an
igloo or a teepee instead of a cabana.

>
> BTW, the Santa Anas were blowing real hard here today.

Tough noogies.

But on a serious note, how does that affect the potential fire situation?

"chilly" wrote ...
> But on a serious note, how does that affect the potential fire situation?

Uhhh... Let's light a match and find out?

Earthquakes, fires, mudslides... All you need are hurricanes and you'll have
it made, Greg...

In article <z484d.487641$gE.220036@pd7tw3no>, chilly
<slarson@shaw.canada> wrote:

€ "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
€ news:415107a3$0$105$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com...
€ > "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
€ > news:Me74d.68433$%S.32225@pd7tw2no...
€ >
€ > >> Jesus. Jesus.
€ > >
€ > > That's interesting. There's a huge Chinook here today. Coincidence?
€ >
€ > Huge Chinook? I thought it was the Apache's turn with you tonight.
€
€ Now don't start that crap. Soon someone will be telling me I have to get an
€ igloo or a teepee instead of a cabana.
€
€ >
€ > BTW, the Santa Anas were blowing real hard here today.
€
€ Tough noogies.
€
€ But on a serious note, how does that affect the potential fire situation?
€
€
€

The forecasts sound kind of ominous:

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/Sandiego/fcs....php?LAXFWFSGX

But the Santa Ana's haven't really started yet (Greg's local
observation notwithstanding), so overall it's not all that dry right
now. And since there's a lot less fuel this year (something about it
all burning up last year , I don't think it's nearly as big a danger
as it was last year.

Alan

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:210920042259370518%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...
> ?
> ? But on a serious note, how does that affect the potential fire
situation?
> ?
> ?
> ?
>
> The forecasts sound kind of ominous:
>
> http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/Sandiego/fcs....php?LAXFWFSGX
>
> But the Santa Ana's haven't really started yet (Greg's local
> observation notwithstanding), so overall it's not all that dry right
> now. And since there's a lot less fuel this year (something about it
> all burning up last year , I don't think it's nearly as big a danger
> as it was last year.

Nice to hear some good news for a change.

The wind is really howling out here tonight. Stuff banging up against the
house and such. But it's a warm wind and after the last couple of weeks, I
can deal with that.

"Alan Street" <agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:210920042259370518%agstreet@nonono_san.rr.com ...

> But the Santa Ana's haven't really started yet (Greg's local
> observation notwithstanding), so overall it's not all that dry right
> now. And since there's a lot less fuel this year (something about it
> all burning up last year , I don't think it's nearly as big a danger
> as it was last year.

My observation was taken at the I-10/I-15 interchange, one of the windiest
spots in SoCal and is confirmed by the following.

SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY VALLEYS -THE INLAND EMPIRE CA-
INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...YUCAIPA...UPLAND...TEMECULA...
SAN BERNARDINO...RUBIDOUX...RIVERSIDE...RIALTO...REDLA NDS...
RANCHO CUCAMONGA...PERRIS...ONTARIO...NORCO...MORENO VALLEY...
MONTCLAIR...LAKE ELSINORE...HIGHLAND...HEMET...FONTANA...CORONA...
COLTON...CHINO HILLS...CHINO AND BANNING
934 PM PDT TUE SEP 21 2004

....WIND ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 2 PM PDT WEDNESDAY...

AREAS OF NORTHEAST WINDS WILL INCREASE OVERNIGHT TO 20 TO 30 MPH
WITH GUSTS TO 45 MPH BELOW PASSES AND CANYONS. GUSTY NORTHEAST WINDS
WILL CONTINUE AT TIMES UNTIL EARLY WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON.

AREAS OF BLOWING DUST MAY LOCALLY REDUCE VISIBILITY TO NEAR ZERO AT
TIMES.

MOTORISTS IN HIGH PROFILE VEHICLES SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR STRONG
GUSTY CROSSWINDS.

Oh, and lest you think these weren't Santa Ana winds, here's more:

"Santa Anas Stir Fears of Fire Across Southland"

"Santa Ana wind gusts of up to 60 mph swept through Southern California's
canyons and mountains Tuesday, prompting the National Weather Service to
issue a "red flag" warning and fire departments to bolster crews as they
braced for the beginning of the fall fire season."

So there.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...nes-california