scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Main Category > Gear
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:26 AM
Al Wells
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Scubapro Mk2 + R290 - why spend more?

In article <khls115n6htpe09pb01qkeoege1jb9293q@4ax.com>,
NOTbracuk@pathcom.com says...
> Al Wells <al.wells@gmail.com> pounded away at his keyboard resulting
> in:
> :My GF and I own about 20 regulators between us.
>
> Why? What do you do with them all?


Back gas regs, stage bottle regs, deco regs, and some extras
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:27 AM
Diesel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Scubapro Mk2 + R290 - why spend more?

>> The truth, however, is that there is exactly one piece in that kit which
>> is
>> actually "special" - the seat - and that the seat often does not need
>> replacing.

>
> Mine's been replaced every time my regulator has been serviced.
>
> Lee

The question is rather did it actually need replacing or is it simply
replaced because its part of the kit.

I've been servicing my 9 Apeks regs for a few years now and only once has a
seat actually failed and the part NEEDING replacement. In fact sometimes
the original nylon surface becomes 'paired' to the seat edge and a new seat
needs time to 'bed in'.

O rings needs regular replacement simply because they have a limited life,
become deformed, dry & perished (especially when used with O2 and Nitrox).
That and the cleaning & re-lubrication are the main benefits of the overhaul
/ service.


Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:27 AM
Lee Bell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Scubapro Mk2 + R290 - why spend more?

> The question is rather did it actually need replacing or is it simply
> replaced because its part of the kit.


Not a bad question, but since all parts are paid for by Scuba Pro and the
service is for a fixed price, who cares?

> I've been servicing my 9 Apeks regs for a few years now and only once has
> a seat actually failed and the part NEEDING replacement.


The idea of annual service is to fix things before they fail, not push them
to the point where they do.

Apex is the only regulator company I know of that I've heard will provide
parts to the public. Nice if true everywhere.

Lee


Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-27-2007, 03:27 AM
Jer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Scubapro Mk2 + R290 - why spend more?

Karl Denninger wrote:
> In article <PBRSd.4349$Ba3.2396@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> Lee Bell <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>"Karl Denninger" wrote
>>
>>
>>>Yeah, and if you buy the SP regs, you'll need that annual service.

>>
>>I have Scuba Pro, US Divers, Oceanic and Buchaut regulators. All of them
>>require annual service as a condition of warantee.

>
>
> So?
>
> If the "requirement" is simply a dupe to rope you into spending money at the
> shop you otherwise would not need to, then who's the fool for playing along?
>
>
>>>The parts are trivial compared to the labor charges... which they DO NOT
>>>cover.

>>
>>The part required for annual service for my Scuba Pro regulators are a bit
>>over half the cost of having one done without warantee coverage. Sorry to
>>hear the labor charges are so much more in your part of the state.

>
>
> Hehehee... you must believe that there's something magical about an O-ring
> in a box that has "Scubapro" on the outside.
>
>
>>>On the other hand, if you buy a SEALED first stage, such as an Apeks DS4,
>>>you might not need to tear into IT for quite a bit longer.

>>
>>I used a US Divers Deep Star regulator for quite a few years without having
>>it serviced. In fact, it was not serviced the entire time I had it. I
>>bought it sometime around 1969 and it was stolen sometime around 1972.

>
>
> See?
>
>
>>>My records suggest that SP piston firsts (no experience with their
>>>diaphrams) start to creep after 50 or so dives, and thus I end up
>>>rebuilding
>>>them.

>>
>>Not all Scuba Pro regulators are piston types and not everybody shares your
>>experience with Scuba Pro regulators. Regardless, Scuba Pro was simply an
>>example of a company that offers a warantee that is significant enough to be
>>considered in the decision of what to buy and whether to buy new or used.
>>
>>Lee

>
>
> I said that not all SP regs are pistons. However, those who I know that
> have had their diaphram first have been even less happy with their stability
> than I was with their pistons.
>
> The "warranty" isn't a warranty - its a "free parts" deal, which for them
> is a great scam. They stick a half-dozen O-rings in a box, slap a $20
> "retail price" on the kit (which cost them $0.20), and then say "see, we
> give you this for FREE - so long as you spend $60 every year at our nice
> dealer over here."
>
> The truth, however, is that there is exactly one piece in that kit which is
> actually "special" - the seat - and that the seat often does not need
> replacing.
>
> The O-rings are nothing special, trivial to buy, and worth a nickel each.
>
> A <WARRANTY> is a representation that a product will be free from defects
> for a given period of time under a certain set of conditions, or it will be
> repaired/replaced by the manufacturer or dealer.
>
> It is not a "we'll give you $0.50 worth of parts every year if you spend $60
> at our co-conspirator the dealer here - provided you never stiff him on that
> nice annual payment."
>
> (PS: If you only need service every 18 months, its less expensive to pay for
> it when you need it, and BUY the parts - even at full retail! Therefore,
> the obvious correct answer to such deceptive marketing is to buy a regulator
> that doesn't require service as often....)
>



....or buying SP anyway and ignoring the scam altogether. Personally,
I've been diving various SP regs for over twenty years and not one has
ever taken it's annual sojourn to The Warranty Bench. They will visit a
bench every two or three years depending on whether I get near enough to
one to duck inside for an afternoon - the rest of the time they get all
the TLC and other abuse I can dish out. Clearly, my regs and I wouldn't
be able to get away this if we weren't so good at what we do - but we
are. I like SP regs, I think they're excellent regs, but their warranty
thing is a marketing scam that I ain't buying. I piss around with crap
that shouldn't need pissing around with enough already, but my SP regs
ain't on that list because I don't think they need to be.


--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problemen met Scubapro R290 (octo)? Sjoerd Korfage (Dutch) 9 04-12-2007 04:42 PM
mk18 + R290 vertigo (Italian) 1 04-11-2007 03:16 PM
MK 2 +R290 enzo (Italian) 0 04-11-2007 03:02 PM
Re: Scubapro MK20/MK25 kostenlose Teilerevision durch SCUBAPRO UWATEC Matthias Römer (German) 0 06-30-2005 03:01 AM
OK, I'll start a long thread, lets talk best semi-dry, or spend $$ for dry Saul Good Gear 22 07-25-2004 11:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.