Re: Ink

You're right, you won't happen again.

But if you continue to spam, you might even not be to long anymore!

Be aware!

<mshawjr@frontiernet.net> schreef in bericht
news:0XwTf.3016$tT.1817@news01.roc.ny...
> Sorry guys. The spam stuff was not my intent. I do oppoligies and won't
> happen again. I have never been on newsgroups before and not sure how to
> work them. I hope you guys can forgive a bad choice. Murphey

"El Mecky" <elmecky@hotmail.com> wrote:

>You're right, you won't happen again.
>
>But if you continue to spam, you might even not be to long anymore!
>
>Be aware!
>
><mshawjr@frontiernet.net> schreef in bericht
>news:0XwTf.3016$tT.1817@news01.roc.ny...
>> Sorry guys. The spam stuff was not my intent. I do oppoligies and won't
>> happen again. I have never been on newsgroups before and not sure how to
>> work them. I hope you guys can forgive a bad choice. Murphey
>
Did you look at how many groups this was cross posted too?

Spam wasn't the intent? Bull

grandma Rosalie

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:32:26 GMT, Rosalie B.
<gmbeasley@mindspring.com> wrote:

>"El Mecky" <elmecky@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>You're right, you won't happen again.
>>
>>But if you continue to spam, you might even not be to long anymore!
>>
>>Be aware!
>>
>><mshawjr@frontiernet.net> schreef in bericht
>>news:0XwTf.3016$tT.1817@news01.roc.ny...
>>> Sorry guys. The spam stuff was not my intent. I do oppoligies and won't
>>> happen again. I have never been on newsgroups before and not sure how to
>>> work them. I hope you guys can forgive a bad choice. Murphey
>>
>Did you look at how many groups this was cross posted too?
>
>Spam wasn't the intent? Bull
>
>grandma Rosalie

I can understand a spammer. They want your money. I cannot
understand those who start a shitstorm by being first to reply to it.
They are more stupid than the spammer. They are like the sideshow
barker pointing to the freak and like a preacher, claiming Jesus
blessed them instead. Always the same song.

Anyone have the figures or is keeping that secret more important than
protecting the children?

On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:27:41 -0600, ben atar @ mus ic.net wrote:

>Anyone have the figures or is keeping that secret more important than
>protecting the children?

Well I only know my experience. First, scout masters are all pussys.
Give them two beers, and they'll do anything for you, including
holding the lil' humps down, while I pummel their tight, little butts.
I never found one that didn't chime in with "yeah! hump that little
bastard!. and get me another beer" while you are 'busy'.

jm

On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:30:58 -0500, sunnybouy@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:27:41 -0600, ben atar @ mus ic.net wrote:
>
>>Anyone have the figures or is keeping that secret more important than
>>protecting the children?
>
>Well I only know my experience. First, scout masters are all pussys.
>Give them two beers, and they'll do anything for you, including
>holding the lil' humps down, while I pummel their tight, little butts.
>I never found one that didn't chime in with "yeah! hump that little
>bastard!. and get me another beer" while you are 'busy'.
>
>jm

Did you swap patches, too?

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:19:18 -0600, wan kers @ rock ers.net wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:30:58 -0500, sunnybouy@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:27:41 -0600, ben atar @ mus ic.net wrote:
>>
>>>Anyone have the figures or is keeping that secret more important than
>>>protecting the children?
>>
>>Well I only know my experience. First, scout masters are all pussys.
>>Give them two beers, and they'll do anything for you, including
>>holding the lil' humps down, while I pummel their tight, little butts.
>>I never found one that didn't chime in with "yeah! hump that little
>>bastard!. and get me another beer" while you are 'busy'.
>>
>>jm
>
>Did you swap patches, too?

Oh yes. Email me for pics and MPG's.
JM

What the hell has this got to do with Scuba??



On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:27:41 -0600, ben atar @ mus ic.net wrote:

>Anyone have the figures or is keeping that secret more important than
>protecting the children?