scubish.com - HOME
 


Go Back   scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum > Main Category > Gear
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:58 PM
nitespark
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?



Grumman-581 wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 05:52:03 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Actually, the units from OTS are SSB

>
>
> SSB implies AM type modulation... That's not to say that someone
> couldn't design something using FM type modulation, but for the most
> part, FM type modulation tend to be at higher frequencies and as such,
> they do not propagate through water as well as lower frequencies, thus
> the range would not be as good... VLF and ELF get very good
> propagation through water, but no one really wants to have to carry
> that long of an antenna around with them... <grin>


The reason FM would not be very well suited for that application is due
to bandwidth. Typical commercial band, bandwidth is +/- 5khz with some
intersitial frequency stuff at +/- 2.5khz. Even that is fairly wide at
the VLF or ELF (not sure where VLF and ELF break) stuff the OTS
equipment operates on which is around 39khz.

The local dive team has some and they love them. I have never used
wireless but have used tethered. The times I have been around the
wireless, I was impressed at the performance.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:58 PM
nitespark
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?



Grumman-581 wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 05:52:03 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Actually, the units from OTS are SSB

>
>
> SSB implies AM type modulation... That's not to say that someone
> couldn't design something using FM type modulation, but for the most
> part, FM type modulation tend to be at higher frequencies and as such,
> they do not propagate through water as well as lower frequencies, thus
> the range would not be as good... VLF and ELF get very good
> propagation through water, but no one really wants to have to carry
> that long of an antenna around with them... <grin>


The reason FM would not be very well suited for that application is due
to bandwidth. Typical commercial band, bandwidth is +/- 5khz with some
intersitial frequency stuff at +/- 2.5khz. Even that is fairly wide at
the VLF or ELF (not sure where VLF and ELF break) stuff the OTS
equipment operates on which is around 39khz.

The local dive team has some and they love them. I have never used
wireless but have used tethered. The times I have been around the
wireless, I was impressed at the performance.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-08-2006, 08:28 PM
r49miner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5aehd2pgjqc4okak8c1src37kovkdhfcr4@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 05:52:03 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
>> Actually, the units from OTS are SSB

>
> SSB implies AM type modulation... That's not to say that someone
> couldn't design something using FM type modulation, but for the most
> part, FM type modulation tend to be at higher frequencies and as such,
> they do not propagate through water as well as lower frequencies, thus
> the range would not be as good... VLF and ELF get very good
> propagation through water, but no one really wants to have to carry
> that long of an antenna around with them... <grin>



I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
equipment.

Chuck


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-08-2006, 08:28 PM
r49miner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5aehd2pgjqc4okak8c1src37kovkdhfcr4@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 05:52:03 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
>> Actually, the units from OTS are SSB

>
> SSB implies AM type modulation... That's not to say that someone
> couldn't design something using FM type modulation, but for the most
> part, FM type modulation tend to be at higher frequencies and as such,
> they do not propagate through water as well as lower frequencies, thus
> the range would not be as good... VLF and ELF get very good
> propagation through water, but no one really wants to have to carry
> that long of an antenna around with them... <grin>



I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
equipment.

Chuck


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-09-2006, 12:28 AM
Grumman-581
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:28:33 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
wrote:
> I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
> equipment.


We're just give you enough information to confuse you to the point
where you won't be able to make a decision... Soon, you'll be saying
that ignorance was bliss... I'm kind of old fashioned, I like hard
wired connections... Preferably connected to a Mk-V helmet...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-09-2006, 12:28 AM
Grumman-581
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:28:33 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
wrote:
> I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
> equipment.


We're just give you enough information to confuse you to the point
where you won't be able to make a decision... Soon, you'll be saying
that ignorance was bliss... I'm kind of old fashioned, I like hard
wired connections... Preferably connected to a Mk-V helmet...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:41 AM
r49miner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?


"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddlid2tl9hddjll340gld9no0loi5jeu8l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:28:33 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
> wrote:
>> I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
>> equipment.

>
> We're just give you enough information to confuse you to the point
> where you won't be able to make a decision... Soon, you'll be saying
> that ignorance was bliss... I'm kind of old fashioned, I like hard
> wired connections... Preferably connected to a Mk-V helmet...


I think I will pass on your idea of a great dive with the Mk-V helmet. I
would feel claustrophobia right away, and I'm not planning on diving past 30
feet and only in rivers. What turns me on is being on the end of an 8"
suction gold dredge. Honest you can't confuse me anymore than I already am.


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:41 AM
r49miner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?


"Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddlid2tl9hddjll340gld9no0loi5jeu8l@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:28:33 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
> wrote:
>> I am learning more all the time. Now if I could only find some used
>> equipment.

>
> We're just give you enough information to confuse you to the point
> where you won't be able to make a decision... Soon, you'll be saying
> that ignorance was bliss... I'm kind of old fashioned, I like hard
> wired connections... Preferably connected to a Mk-V helmet...


I think I will pass on your idea of a great dive with the Mk-V helmet. I
would feel claustrophobia right away, and I'm not planning on diving past 30
feet and only in rivers. What turns me on is being on the end of an 8"
suction gold dredge. Honest you can't confuse me anymore than I already am.


Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:51 AM
Grumman-581
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:41:11 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
wrote:
> I think I will pass on your idea of a great dive with the Mk-V helmet. I
> would feel claustrophobia right away, and I'm not planning on diving past 30
> feet and only in rivers. What turns me on is being on the end of an 8"
> suction gold dredge.


Odd are, you would make more money mowing lawns...

> Honest you can't confuse me anymore than I already am.


Thanks... I guess I can retire now with the satisfaction of knowing
that my mission is done...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:51 AM
Grumman-581
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Surface to diver radio?

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 21:41:11 -0700, "r49miner" <nospamr49miner@cox.net>
wrote:
> I think I will pass on your idea of a great dive with the Mk-V helmet. I
> would feel claustrophobia right away, and I'm not planning on diving past 30
> feet and only in rivers. What turns me on is being on the end of an 8"
> suction gold dredge.


Odd are, you would make more money mowing lawns...

> Honest you can't confuse me anymore than I already am.


Thanks... I guess I can retire now with the satisfaction of knowing
that my mission is done...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Joint mano surface Pascal cottinet (French) 9 04-12-2007 12:45 PM
below what surface interval is considered same dive ? Mario Australia 35 04-07-2007 05:18 PM
UK conditions: Surface mattD United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland 1 03-27-2007 12:55 AM
below what surface interval is considered same dive ? Mario Divers Hangout 35 03-26-2007 11:42 AM
What to do in Fiji on the surface? Eugene Golts Fiji 2 08-29-2005 06:37 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.




SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.