|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| brianp@austin.rr.com wrote: > Hi, > > II'm going to the Great Barrier Reef in January and need a professional > level dual strobe underwater system for my D200. > Good start, where abouts on the reef are you going. The best sites, I think, are in the far north. > Current hardware: > ============= > Nikon D200 camera > Nikon 18-200 mm VR zoom lens > Dual Nikon SB-800 strobes > 8 GB Lexar 133x compact flash memory > > I have been told that the 18-200 is not a good underwater lens and the > dome makers don't officially support it. However, they do support the > venerable 17-35 F2.8 zoom. The 18-200 is almost the same size only > smaller in both length with not quite as wide an angle. If I left it at > 18mm, it should fit. It might fit but you probably won't be making best use of the lens. I had the same issues when I was looking for a housing for my F80 I had the 28-105 lens but went for the 18-35 in this case. When I got the housing for my D70 I just use the 18-70 which works quite well, a pretty decent all rounder. If you are just going to leave it at 18mm wou might as well just go out and get a 20mm prime lens which will give you much better performance and will not be too much extra. For underwater work you might want to consider something a bit wider even. Nikon's 12-24 and Sigma's 10-20 have good reps underwater. > Is there some reason this lens would not work well? At 18mm, it is > rated at F/3.5, just slightly slower than the F/2.8 of the 17-35. The > Vibration Reduction, "VR" works amazingly well allowing a shutter > speed up to 4 stops slower than without VR. It gives amazingly sharp > pictures, even hand held at 200mm in dim light. Shoothing wide and with that much light you shouldn't need the extra stops. Also the inertia of the rig and just being underwater tends to damp down any movement. > Strobes: > ======== > Fantasea makes a housing for the SB-800 > strobes:http://www.fantasea.com/product_details.asp?id=89 > It's rated to 80 M and supports iTTL balanced fill flash and accepts a > 5 Pin Nikonos Style Sync Cord. > I sure would like to use these superb flashes rather than buying 2, > $800 dedicated underwater strobes which would be of little use above > water. This is probably the best way to get iTTL underwater as there aren't any underwater strobes that handle iTTL themselves, as far as I know. There are a few iTTL interfaces available, namely the Ikelite (but only with Ikelite strobes) and the Mathias Heinrichs which is used either OEM in the housing (Aquatica) or in a separate converter (Sea & Sea), which will allow iTTL with current underwater strobes. > Does anybody have any success/horror stories about the 18-200 with > SB-800s and any of these housings? > > Sealux CD200. $2183. > Sea&Sea DX-D200 $2496 > Ikelite 6812 iTTL $1379 > You might also want to have a look at housings from: Aquatica - reasonably priced for an aluminium housing Subal - beautifully crafted housing Light & Motion - uses a USB connection so the controls are more ergonomically placed I would say definitely use some different glass, keep the 18-200 topside. Strobes sound good. Housings - its a matter of what feels good and what you can afford. Have a look at http://www.digitaldiver.net there are a few regulars on there that will be using some form of D200 rig enjoy jon |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| brianp@austin.rr.com wrote: > Hi, > > II'm going to the Great Barrier Reef in January and need a professional > level dual strobe underwater system for my D200. > Good start, where abouts on the reef are you going. The best sites, I think, are in the far north. > Current hardware: > ============= > Nikon D200 camera > Nikon 18-200 mm VR zoom lens > Dual Nikon SB-800 strobes > 8 GB Lexar 133x compact flash memory > > I have been told that the 18-200 is not a good underwater lens and the > dome makers don't officially support it. However, they do support the > venerable 17-35 F2.8 zoom. The 18-200 is almost the same size only > smaller in both length with not quite as wide an angle. If I left it at > 18mm, it should fit. It might fit but you probably won't be making best use of the lens. I had the same issues when I was looking for a housing for my F80 I had the 28-105 lens but went for the 18-35 in this case. When I got the housing for my D70 I just use the 18-70 which works quite well, a pretty decent all rounder. If you are just going to leave it at 18mm wou might as well just go out and get a 20mm prime lens which will give you much better performance and will not be too much extra. For underwater work you might want to consider something a bit wider even. Nikon's 12-24 and Sigma's 10-20 have good reps underwater. > Is there some reason this lens would not work well? At 18mm, it is > rated at F/3.5, just slightly slower than the F/2.8 of the 17-35. The > Vibration Reduction, "VR" works amazingly well allowing a shutter > speed up to 4 stops slower than without VR. It gives amazingly sharp > pictures, even hand held at 200mm in dim light. Shoothing wide and with that much light you shouldn't need the extra stops. Also the inertia of the rig and just being underwater tends to damp down any movement. > Strobes: > ======== > Fantasea makes a housing for the SB-800 > strobes:http://www.fantasea.com/product_details.asp?id=89 > It's rated to 80 M and supports iTTL balanced fill flash and accepts a > 5 Pin Nikonos Style Sync Cord. > I sure would like to use these superb flashes rather than buying 2, > $800 dedicated underwater strobes which would be of little use above > water. This is probably the best way to get iTTL underwater as there aren't any underwater strobes that handle iTTL themselves, as far as I know. There are a few iTTL interfaces available, namely the Ikelite (but only with Ikelite strobes) and the Mathias Heinrichs which is used either OEM in the housing (Aquatica) or in a separate converter (Sea & Sea), which will allow iTTL with current underwater strobes. > Does anybody have any success/horror stories about the 18-200 with > SB-800s and any of these housings? > > Sealux CD200. $2183. > Sea&Sea DX-D200 $2496 > Ikelite 6812 iTTL $1379 > You might also want to have a look at housings from: Aquatica - reasonably priced for an aluminium housing Subal - beautifully crafted housing Light & Motion - uses a USB connection so the controls are more ergonomically placed I would say definitely use some different glass, keep the 18-200 topside. Strobes sound good. Housings - its a matter of what feels good and what you can afford. Have a look at http://www.digitaldiver.net there are a few regulars on there that will be using some form of D200 rig enjoy jon |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi, II'm going to the Great Barrier Reef in January and need a professional level dual strobe underwater system for my D200. Current hardware: ============= Nikon D200 camera Nikon 18-200 mm VR zoom lens Dual Nikon SB-800 strobes 8 GB Lexar 133x compact flash memory I have been told that the 18-200 is not a good underwater lens and the dome makers don't officially support it. However, they do support the venerable 17-35 F2.8 zoom. The 18-200 is almost the same size only smaller in both length with not quite as wide an angle. If I left it at 18mm, it should fit. Is there some reason this lens would not work well? At 18mm, it is rated at F/3.5, just slightly slower than the F/2.8 of the 17-35. The Vibration Reduction, "VR" works amazingly well allowing a shutter speed up to 4 stops slower than without VR. It gives amazingly sharp pictures, even hand held at 200mm in dim light. Strobes: ======== Fantasea makes a housing for the SB-800 strobes:http://www.fantasea.com/product_details.asp?id=89 It's rated to 80 M and supports iTTL balanced fill flash and accepts a 5 Pin Nikonos Style Sync Cord. I sure would like to use these superb flashes rather than buying 2, $800 dedicated underwater strobes which would be of little use above water. Does anybody have any success/horror stories about the 18-200 with SB-800s and any of these housings? Sealux CD200. $2183. Sea&Sea DX-D200 $2496 Ikelite 6812 iTTL $1379 Thank you, Brian. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| brianp@austin.rr.com wrote: > Hi, > > II'm going to the Great Barrier Reef in January and need a professional > level dual strobe underwater system for my D200. > Good start, where abouts on the reef are you going. The best sites, I think, are in the far north. > Current hardware: > ============= > Nikon D200 camera > Nikon 18-200 mm VR zoom lens > Dual Nikon SB-800 strobes > 8 GB Lexar 133x compact flash memory > > I have been told that the 18-200 is not a good underwater lens and the > dome makers don't officially support it. However, they do support the > venerable 17-35 F2.8 zoom. The 18-200 is almost the same size only > smaller in both length with not quite as wide an angle. If I left it at > 18mm, it should fit. It might fit but you probably won't be making best use of the lens. I had the same issues when I was looking for a housing for my F80 I had the 28-105 lens but went for the 18-35 in this case. When I got the housing for my D70 I just use the 18-70 which works quite well, a pretty decent all rounder. If you are just going to leave it at 18mm wou might as well just go out and get a 20mm prime lens which will give you much better performance and will not be too much extra. For underwater work you might want to consider something a bit wider even. Nikon's 12-24 and Sigma's 10-20 have good reps underwater. > Is there some reason this lens would not work well? At 18mm, it is > rated at F/3.5, just slightly slower than the F/2.8 of the 17-35. The > Vibration Reduction, "VR" works amazingly well allowing a shutter > speed up to 4 stops slower than without VR. It gives amazingly sharp > pictures, even hand held at 200mm in dim light. Shoothing wide and with that much light you shouldn't need the extra stops. Also the inertia of the rig and just being underwater tends to damp down any movement. > Strobes: > ======== > Fantasea makes a housing for the SB-800 > strobes:http://www.fantasea.com/product_details.asp?id=89 > It's rated to 80 M and supports iTTL balanced fill flash and accepts a > 5 Pin Nikonos Style Sync Cord. > I sure would like to use these superb flashes rather than buying 2, > $800 dedicated underwater strobes which would be of little use above > water. This is probably the best way to get iTTL underwater as there aren't any underwater strobes that handle iTTL themselves, as far as I know. There are a few iTTL interfaces available, namely the Ikelite (but only with Ikelite strobes) and the Mathias Heinrichs which is used either OEM in the housing (Aquatica) or in a separate converter (Sea & Sea), which will allow iTTL with current underwater strobes. > Does anybody have any success/horror stories about the 18-200 with > SB-800s and any of these housings? > > Sealux CD200. $2183. > Sea&Sea DX-D200 $2496 > Ikelite 6812 iTTL $1379 > You might also want to have a look at housings from: Aquatica - reasonably priced for an aluminium housing Subal - beautifully crafted housing Light & Motion - uses a USB connection so the controls are more ergonomically placed I would say definitely use some different glass, keep the 18-200 topside. Strobes sound good. Housings - its a matter of what feels good and what you can afford. Have a look at http://www.digitaldiver.net there are a few regulars on there that will be using some form of D200 rig enjoy jon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dual pupose camera. Good for family snaps but has a good underwater case | dechucka | Australia | 111 | 04-23-2007 08:16 AM |
| Nikon D200 et photo sous-marine | Pierre Courty | (French) | 3 | 04-12-2007 12:07 PM |
| Newbie - Nikon D200 | Marco | Underwater Photo | 24 | 12-01-2006 11:36 AM |
| UW Pro Nikon camera system FS in UK | Tony Howard | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 6 | 11-16-2004 10:24 AM |
| UW Pro Nikon camera system FS in UK | Tony Howard | Gear | 2 | 11-16-2004 10:24 AM |