|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > On Sep 12, 3:47 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> - Steel tanks tend to last longer, but are vulnerable to rust. Take the >> valve off and shine a small flashlight into the tank. If you see scales of >> rust, pits or any similar indications that the inside of the tank is >> damaged, drill a hole in the tank and start over. There's no point in paying >> good money to test a tank you already know won't pass. If it's smooth >> inside, have it hydro tested. > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > On Sep 12, 3:47 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> - Steel tanks tend to last longer, but are vulnerable to rust. Take the >> valve off and shine a small flashlight into the tank. If you see scales of >> rust, pits or any similar indications that the inside of the tank is >> damaged, drill a hole in the tank and start over. There's no point in paying >> good money to test a tank you already know won't pass. If it's smooth >> inside, have it hydro tested. > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
| Greg Mossman wrote: > On Sep 12, 3:47 am, "Lee Bell" <pleeb...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> - Steel tanks tend to last longer, but are vulnerable to rust. Take the >> valve off and shine a small flashlight into the tank. If you see scales of >> rust, pits or any similar indications that the inside of the tank is >> damaged, drill a hole in the tank and start over. There's no point in paying >> good money to test a tank you already know won't pass. If it's smooth >> inside, have it hydro tested. > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| Blah <b...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which results in significant wall thinning. -hh |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
| Blah <b...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which results in significant wall thinning. -hh |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| Blah <b...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which results in significant wall thinning. -hh |
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| Blah <b...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Greg Mossman wrote: > > > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? > > Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which results in significant wall thinning. -hh |
|
#38
| |||
| |||
| -hh wrote >> > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? >> >> Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? > And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, > but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on > the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which > results in significant wall thinning. I was pretty specific about the conditions that would lead to scrapping the tank. It included significant flaking and pitting, either of which are likely to fail the tank on the next visual, with or without a hydro. Even if the tank might make it one more time, the cost benefit of tumbling a steel tank that old is limited and the risk of depending on such a tank for the five years until the next hydro date is higher than I'd choose to take. Lee |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
| -hh wrote >> > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? >> >> Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? > And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, > but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on > the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which > results in significant wall thinning. I was pretty specific about the conditions that would lead to scrapping the tank. It included significant flaking and pitting, either of which are likely to fail the tank on the next visual, with or without a hydro. Even if the tank might make it one more time, the cost benefit of tumbling a steel tank that old is limited and the risk of depending on such a tank for the five years until the next hydro date is higher than I'd choose to take. Lee |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| -hh wrote >> > What's wrong with getting it tumbled to remove the rust? >> >> Everytime you do it reduces the wall thickness and reduces strength? > And a lot can depend on how the tank was stored. Upright can be Ok, > but if it was stored laying down, then you can get a "rust line" on > the bottom that takes a lot of tumbling to dig it all out, which > results in significant wall thinning. I was pretty specific about the conditions that would lead to scrapping the tank. It included significant flaking and pitting, either of which are likely to fail the tank on the next visual, with or without a hydro. Even if the tank might make it one more time, the cost benefit of tumbling a steel tank that old is limited and the risk of depending on such a tank for the five years until the next hydro date is higher than I'd choose to take. Lee |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are Old Tanks Worth Hydroing? | pjbphd | Divers Hangout | 29 | 10-09-2007 05:35 PM |
| Are Old Tanks Worth Hydroing? | pjbphd | Vacation ideas | 95 | 10-09-2007 05:27 PM |
| Re: For what it's worth... | Douglas W. \Popeye\ Frederick | Divers Hangout | 1 | 06-16-2007 09:57 PM |
| FS: Qty (2)Scuba Tanks 100 CU Aluminum Tanks | Randy | Gear | 4 | 03-27-2007 12:53 AM |
| Nitrox tanks worth it? | Dillon Pyron | Divers Hangout | 53 | 03-26-2007 06:50 PM |