|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Hoffman" <hoffman@charter.net> wrote in message news:bhgur318gj8898nchi8s6g030f689h3cuf@4ax.com... > I'm gonna buy it for a week in Hawaii and leave it behind. What's the > best brand Wal Mart carries? TIA! I doubt anyone here buys dive gear at Wal-Mart. Adam |
|
#42
| |||
| |||
| Jer wrote > My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. > Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right reasons. > As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can > understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, > Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you > mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. > Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the > free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good > consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated > consumers, are they? Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. Just saying it does not do it. Lee |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| Jer wrote > My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. > Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right reasons. > As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can > understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, > Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you > mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. > Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the > free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good > consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated > consumers, are they? Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. Just saying it does not do it. Lee |
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| Jer wrote > My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. > Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right reasons. > As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can > understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, > Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you > mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. > Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the > free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good > consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated > consumers, are they? Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. Just saying it does not do it. Lee |
|
#45
| |||
| |||
| Jer wrote > My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. > Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right reasons. > As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can > understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, > Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you > mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. > Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the > free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good > consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated > consumers, are they? Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. Just saying it does not do it. Lee |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| Lee Bell wrote: > Jer wrote > >> My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. >> Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. > > Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation > from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right > reasons. Of course her leaving was voluntary - she refused to work for a company with a morally rotten core. Her opinion, and one that I share. > >> As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can >> understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, >> Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you >> mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. >> Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the >> free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good >> consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated >> consumers, are they? > > Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other > businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. > Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If > you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that > Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. > Just saying it does not do it. Well, it better "do it" because I'm under a gag order when it comes to details. I'm allowed to offer my personal opinion of the company, I'm allowed to offer the personal opinion of another member of my family, and I'm allowed to acknowledge the existence of a gag order, no more. I'm sure you understand that legal matters are often kept under wraps, sometimes permanently. If you have further questions I can refer you to the NLRB. Good luck. In closing, I can also say you couldn't drag me into a Walmart store with a bulldozer and logging chain. Personal opinion, of course. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
|
#47
| |||
| |||
| Lee Bell wrote: > Jer wrote > >> My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. >> Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. > > Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation > from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right > reasons. Of course her leaving was voluntary - she refused to work for a company with a morally rotten core. Her opinion, and one that I share. > >> As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can >> understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, >> Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you >> mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. >> Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the >> free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good >> consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated >> consumers, are they? > > Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other > businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. > Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If > you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that > Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. > Just saying it does not do it. Well, it better "do it" because I'm under a gag order when it comes to details. I'm allowed to offer my personal opinion of the company, I'm allowed to offer the personal opinion of another member of my family, and I'm allowed to acknowledge the existence of a gag order, no more. I'm sure you understand that legal matters are often kept under wraps, sometimes permanently. If you have further questions I can refer you to the NLRB. Good luck. In closing, I can also say you couldn't drag me into a Walmart store with a bulldozer and logging chain. Personal opinion, of course. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
|
#48
| |||
| |||
| Lee Bell wrote: > Jer wrote > >> My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. >> Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. > > Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation > from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right > reasons. Of course her leaving was voluntary - she refused to work for a company with a morally rotten core. Her opinion, and one that I share. > >> As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can >> understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, >> Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you >> mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. >> Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the >> free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good >> consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated >> consumers, are they? > > Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other > businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. > Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If > you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that > Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. > Just saying it does not do it. Well, it better "do it" because I'm under a gag order when it comes to details. I'm allowed to offer my personal opinion of the company, I'm allowed to offer the personal opinion of another member of my family, and I'm allowed to acknowledge the existence of a gag order, no more. I'm sure you understand that legal matters are often kept under wraps, sometimes permanently. If you have further questions I can refer you to the NLRB. Good luck. In closing, I can also say you couldn't drag me into a Walmart store with a bulldozer and logging chain. Personal opinion, of course. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
|
#49
| |||
| |||
| Lee Bell wrote: > Jer wrote > >> My sis used to work for Walmart in Fayetteville, AR. >> Operative word: Use to, and for all the right reasons. > > Of course. Employment is a very personal choice. Assuming her separation > from the company was voluntary, it's a given that it was for the right > reasons. Of course her leaving was voluntary - she refused to work for a company with a morally rotten core. Her opinion, and one that I share. > >> As a mere consumer in the public spaces of Walmart (and Sam's), I can >> understand how you believe you're doing the right thing. Truth is, >> Walmart has internal business practices than the other business you >> mentioned don't have. I would caution you to know the difference. >> Walking into the door of a Walmart or Sam's is likened to trampling on the >> free enterprise system you espouse. Then again, you're such a good >> consumer, aren't you? Good consumers aren't necessarily educated >> consumers, are they? > > Your statement that "Wal-Mart has internal business practices that the other > businesses don't have provides no information at all. Of course they do. > Every business has internal business practices that others don't have. If > you believe those practices should be known, post them. If you believe that > Wal-Mart and Sams trample on the free enterprise system, make your case. > Just saying it does not do it. Well, it better "do it" because I'm under a gag order when it comes to details. I'm allowed to offer my personal opinion of the company, I'm allowed to offer the personal opinion of another member of my family, and I'm allowed to acknowledge the existence of a gag order, no more. I'm sure you understand that legal matters are often kept under wraps, sometimes permanently. If you have further questions I can refer you to the NLRB. Good luck. In closing, I can also say you couldn't drag me into a Walmart store with a bulldozer and logging chain. Personal opinion, of course. -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' |
|
#50
| |||
| |||
| "Adam Helberg" <sendspamhere@yahee.com> wrote in message news:47c34697$0$16679$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > > "Mark Hoffman" <hoffman@charter.net> wrote in message > news:bhgur318gj8898nchi8s6g030f689h3cuf@4ax.com... >> I'm gonna buy it for a week in Hawaii and leave it behind. What's the >> best brand Wal Mart carries? TIA! > > I doubt anyone here buys dive gear at Wal-Mart. You'd be incorrect. I got a mask for $15 ("Dolphino" brand) at Wallyworld, after losing one on a dive trip, used it for a year as a primary, a couple years as a spare, and gave it away to someone in need last year. The skirt was a little thick (the only oddity, not necessarily a disparity, that I noticed), but it worked great, and fogged less than any mask I ever owned. On the rare occasion I use a snorkel, I use ones that don't have extraneous percundis, wigetry and foolishness on the tube, and you can get that for about $5 at Walmart. Anyone that ever spent more than $15 on a snorkel, and didn't at least learn a lesson, needs shock therapy and a keeper. -- -- A skilled, armed man lives on a plane of security and contentment different from that of others. The man who cannot cut it, envies, fears and sometimes hates the man who can. -Cooper Popeye/www.finalprotectivefire.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Use that critical package from the Microsoft Corporation | Kari Jokinen | (Swedish) | 1 | 04-12-2007 04:33 PM |
| Package bouquins | Gabbagabbahey | (French) | 2 | 04-12-2007 01:01 AM |
| week end en Corse : pas de package possible ?? | antwan | (French) | 13 | 04-12-2007 12:58 AM |
| Starter Snorkeling Package? | Bob & Kathy | Gear | 5 | 03-27-2007 01:01 AM |
| FS: Complete Scuba Package in Orlando, FL | scuba@brong.com | Gear | 0 | 03-27-2007 12:52 AM |