Re: Nuclear assets 'vanish' in Iraq

I think Bush stole it just to keep the war going to make his buddies on
the Tri-Lateral Commission rich.

Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> Equipment and materials that could be used to make nuclear arms have been
> vanishing in Iraq since the invasion, the United Nations has warned.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3735224.stm
>

I thought they didn't have any.

"GWB" <gwb3483@aol.compost> wrote in message
news:20041013031152.25434.00002095@mb-m04.aol.com...

> I thought they didn't have any.

<cough>

Thats OK, they have found more mass graves:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/...?oneclick=true
Investigators have conducted their first scientific exhumation of Iraq's
"killing fields", discovering hundreds of bodies which they hope will help
convict Saddam Hussein of crimes against humanity.

They say nine trenches in a dry, dusty riverbed at the Hatra site in
northern Iraq contain at least 300 bodies, and possibly thousands, including
unborn babies and toddlers still clutching toys.

"It is my personal opinion that this is a killing field," said Greg Kehoe, a
US lawyer appointed by the White House to work with the Iraqi Special
Tribunal. "Someone used this field on significant occasions over time to
take bodies up there, and to take people up there and execute them.

"I've been doing grave sites for a long time, but I've never seen anything
like this, women and children executed for no apparent reason," added Kehoe,
who spent five years in the Balkans. "It's a perfect place for execution."

The victims are believed to be minority Kurds killed during 1987-88. One
trench contains only women and children, apparently killed by small arms.
Another contains only men, apparently killed by automatic gunfire.

Kehoe said the women and children had been taken from their villages with
their belongings, including pots and pans, shot - often in the back of the
head - then bulldozed into the trench.
Some of the mothers died still holding their children. One young boy still
held a ball in his tiny arms. A thick stench hangs over the site, as well as
at a makeshift morgue nearby.

"The youngest foetus we have was 18 to 20 foetal weeks. Tiny bones, femurs,
thighbones the size of a matchstick," says investigating anthropologist P
Willey, of California.

International organisations estimate more than 300,000 people died under
Saddam's 24-year rule and Iraq's Human Rights ministry has identified 40
possible mass graves countrywide.

Authorities hope careful investigations of the sites will provide enough
evidence to convict Saddam and other senior members of his regime, now in US
detention, of crimes against humanity.

Investigators have excavated smaller mass graves before but never, they say,
with such a methodical and forensic focus, aimed at gathering indisputable
evidence of who was responsible.

Ahead of today's expected completion of digging at Hatra, investigators took
a pool reporter to the scene, who provided details for Reuters and other
media.

"We're trying to meet international standards that have been accepted by
courts throughout the world," Kehoe said. "That's our benchmark. One of the
reasons why we're going to stop digging now is because we have a lot of work
to do back at the morgue.

"That takes time. We're putting a package together on each body removed -
pictures of bones, clothes, a forensic report."

Saddam is expected to face trial for crimes against humanity next year, but
no timetable or details of the charges have yet been announced.
Investigators are still pursuing evidence.

During his reign, Saddam pushed hundreds of thousands of Arabs into Kurdish
areas to force the locals out. He is accused of widespread abuses against
the Kurds, including the "Anfal" (The Spoils) campaign in 1988, during which
thousands died in a mustard gas attack. Human Rights Watch estimates that
more than 50,000 Kurds were killed during the campaign.

"Genocide is the attempt to eliminate, limit or exterminate a religious
ethnic national or racial group," said Kehoe. "The Kurds are clearly a
different nationality. So could it be considered genocide? It could be.

"Killing, ethnic cleansing, property relocations, all of those were used to
try to limit the Kurdish population. What it is, fundamentally, is downright
murder.

"Everybody said 'never again' after the Holocaust. The world wasn't
listening. That's how it happened again and again and again."

In article <sz0bd.8590$l07.1939@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, MC
<call@rochester.rr.com> writes:

> think Bush stole it just to keep the war going to make his buddies on
>the Tri-Lateral Commission rich.

You may be right! hehehehehehe

Exactly, the ones they didn't have have vanished. And now we can prove
it. Or something.

Cam