Re: Sanchez: Iraq war 'a nightmare with no end in sight'

On Oct 15, 7:16 am, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...hez/index.html
>
> "Who will demand accountability for the failure of our national
> political leadership involved in
> the management of this war," he said. "They have unquestionably been
> derelict in in the
> performance of their duty. In my profession, these types of leaders
> would be immediately
> relieved or court-martialed."

When can we expect an indignant response from the neo-con cuntbubbles?

We're waiting......................................

RecScubaPoster wrote:

> On Oct 15, 7:16 am, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...hez/index.html
>>
>>"Who will demand accountability for the failure of our national
>>political leadership involved in
>>the management of this war," he said. "They have unquestionably been
>>derelict in in the
>>performance of their duty. In my profession, these types of leaders
>>would be immediately
>>relieved or court-martialed."
>
>
> When can we expect an indignant response from the neo-con cuntbubbles?
>
> We're waiting......................................
>

What makes you think that it is worthy of a response

--
“TANSTAAFL”

__________________________________________________ __________________________

But - there is a point where criticism, even offered in the guise of
love, moves past the point of correction and to the point of
destruction. It's a subtle line, but it exists.

"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
news:0ZKdnThgkKkOIIvanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> RecScubaPoster wrote:
>
> > On Oct 15, 7:16 am, RecScubaPoster <recscubapos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...hez/index.html
> >>
> >>"Who will demand accountability for the failure of our national
> >>political leadership involved in
> >>the management of this war," he said. "They have unquestionably been
> >>derelict in in the
> >>performance of their duty. In my profession, these types of leaders
> >>would be immediately
> >>relieved or court-martialed."
> >
> >
> > When can we expect an indignant response from the neo-con cuntbubbles?

RecScubaPoster says "I think I'm schizophrenic and so do I."

"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in message
news:0ZKdnThgkKkOIIvanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

> What makes you think that it is worthy of a response?

http://tinyurl.com/2tmgqz

Poor little Carl.

Has to keep changing nyms to attempt to deliver his infantile tantrums.

As we roll closer to the election the lefties that have kidnapped the
democrat party are doing what they always do;

http://tinyurl.com/3dn67t

http://tinyurl.com/38y8q3

Once again they will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

On Oct 20, 12:10 pm, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in messagenews:0ZKdnThgkKkOIIvanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comca st.com...
>
> > What makes you think that it is worthy of a response?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2tmgqz
>
> Poor little Carl.
>
> Has to keep changing nyms to attempt to deliver his infantile tantrums.
>
> As we roll closer to the election the lefties that have kidnapped the
> democrat party are doing what they always do;
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3dn67t
>
> http://tinyurl.com/38y8q3
>
> Once again they will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Dream on.

"The fall of 2007 is a good time to be Senator Hillary Clinton. Her
lead has been growing in national polls for the Democratic
Presidential Nomination, her negatives have held steady while those
for her challengers have been growing, she leads now in Iowa and New
Hampshire, and the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey
finds that Clinton is seen as the most electable candidate in either
party.

"Eighty-one percent (81%) of Democrats say that Clinton is at least
somewhat likely to win the White House if nominated by her party.
That's up from 75% a month ago and the current total includes an
astounding 50% of Democrats who believe she is Very Likely to win it
all if nominated. No other candidate, Republican or Democrat, comes
close to that figure. A month ago, 41% of Democrats thought Clinton
was Very Likely to win."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/rasmussen/20...xeCou juM5QcF

Greg Mossman wrote:

> On Oct 20, 12:10 pm, "Scott" <pugetsounddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"dazed and confuzzed" <dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote in messagenews:0ZKdnThgkKkOIIvanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comca st.com...
>>
>>
>>>What makes you think that it is worthy of a response?
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/2tmgqz
>>
>>Poor little Carl.
>>
>>Has to keep changing nyms to attempt to deliver his infantile tantrums.
>>
>>As we roll closer to the election the lefties that have kidnapped the
>>democrat party are doing what they always do;
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/3dn67t
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/38y8q3
>>
>>Once again they will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
>
>
> Dream on.
>
> "The fall of 2007 is a good time to be Senator Hillary Clinton. Her
> lead has been growing in national polls for the Democratic
> Presidential Nomination, her negatives have held steady while those
> for her challengers have been growing, she leads now in Iowa and New
> Hampshire, and the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey
> finds that Clinton is seen as the most electable candidate in either
> party.
>
> "Eighty-one percent (81%) of Democrats say that Clinton is at least
> somewhat likely to win the White House if nominated by her party.
> That's up from 75% a month ago and the current total includes an
> astounding 50% of Democrats who believe she is Very Likely to win it
> all if nominated. No other candidate, Republican or Democrat, comes
> close to that figure. A month ago, 41% of Democrats thought Clinton
> was Very Likely to win."
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/rasmussen/20...xeCou juM5QcF
>
>

If she can stay ahead of the FEC.

THe "bundlers" are being brought to light. It's interesting that so many
of the unverifiable "contributors" are of chinese extraction.

--
“TANSTAAFL”

__________________________________________________ __________________________

America: Ironically, the safest place to be anti-American.

On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:59:03 -0500, dazed and confuzzed
<dedmann@comcast_remove.net> wrote:

> If she can stay ahead of the FEC.
>
> THe "bundlers" are being brought to light. It's interesting that so many
> of the unverifiable "contributors" are of chinese extraction.

They figure that with her in office, they can buy some more missile
and satellite technology like they did with Billy-Boy...

--
"This is not an abandoned USENET post."