Re: Bush-Blair Iraq war memo revealed

"Anonymous via Panta Rhei" wrote

>> The New York Times is, quite possibly, the most liberal, most rabid
>> Democrat
>> supporting publication in the country.

> Is that evidence that they are wrong?

No, but it damned sure is evidence that you need to check their information
very carefully before basing any personal decisions on it.

>> Who the hell cares what they say?

> People who consider the truth.

See the words above.

I saw a memo that says that the weapons of mass destruction were there all
along, that they were hidden and moved any time the inspectors looked like
they might be getting close. They included biological and chemical weapons.
Come to think of it, Bush saw a similar memo.

You don't believe his memo or, I presume, mine. Why would you believe the
New York Times one?

Lee

"Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:rA9Wf.2752$V7.1439@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> "Anonymous via Panta Rhei" wrote
>
> >> The New York Times is, quite possibly, the most liberal, most rabid
> >> Democrat
> >> supporting publication in the country.
>
> > Is that evidence that they are wrong?
>
> No, but it damned sure is evidence that you need to check their
information
> very carefully before basing any personal decisions on it.
>
> >> Who the hell cares what they say?
>
> > People who consider the truth.
>
> See the words above.
>
> I saw a memo that says that the weapons of mass destruction were there all
> along, that they were hidden and moved any time the inspectors looked like
> they might be getting close. They included biological and chemical
weapons.
> Come to think of it, Bush saw a similar memo.
>
> You don't believe his memo or, I presume, mine. Why would you believe the
> New York Times one?

Does anyone else see the irony in that he's quoting a BBC report about a New
Your Times, rather than using the New Your Times directly?

Heck, I couldve told 'em that Bush would go to war with or without UN
backing back in 2003, and I hadn't seen the memo.

And whats with this "paraphrased" business?

Dennis
>
> Lee
>
>
>

"Dennis (Icarus)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote in message
news:66433$44293102$18d64cf6$14215@KNOLOGY.NET...

> Heck, I couldve told 'em that Bush would go to war with or without UN
> backing back in 2003, and I hadn't seen the memo.

Ditto.

> And whats with this "paraphrased" business?

Inquiring minds and all that...