18m dives around north or west Ireland

On 14 Jun 2005 08:33:36 GMT, Stimp <ren@spumco.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
><SNIP!>
>
>If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
>originally.

Don't give up on UKRS too easily. The newsgroup is unmoderated so
cannot be held responsible for its content!

The group is not "high traffic" at the moment, but sensible and
interesting questions generally get informed and measured replies.
Stuff that has been debated to death, and is available in the FAQs,
might get less response.

Occasionally someone will be having an off-day, and fire off something
less than heplful, but this is up to you to filter, and generally the
signal to noise ratio is good.

David

On 14 Jun 2005 08:33:36 GMT, Stimp <ren@spumco.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
><SNIP!>
>
>If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
>originally.

Don't give up on UKRS too easily. The newsgroup is unmoderated so
cannot be held responsible for its content!

The group is not "high traffic" at the moment, but sensible and
interesting questions generally get informed and measured replies.
Stuff that has been debated to death, and is available in the FAQs,
might get less response.

Occasionally someone will be having an off-day, and fire off something
less than heplful, but this is up to you to filter, and generally the
signal to noise ratio is good.

David

On 14 Jun 2005 08:33:36 GMT, Stimp <ren@spumco.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
><SNIP!>
>
>If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
>originally.

Don't give up on UKRS too easily. The newsgroup is unmoderated so
cannot be held responsible for its content!

The group is not "high traffic" at the moment, but sensible and
interesting questions generally get informed and measured replies.
Stuff that has been debated to death, and is available in the FAQs,
might get less response.

Occasionally someone will be having an off-day, and fire off something
less than heplful, but this is up to you to filter, and generally the
signal to noise ratio is good.

David

On 14 Jun 2005 08:33:36 GMT, Stimp <ren@spumco.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
><SNIP!>
>
>If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
>originally.

Don't give up on UKRS too easily. The newsgroup is unmoderated so
cannot be held responsible for its content!

The group is not "high traffic" at the moment, but sensible and
interesting questions generally get informed and measured replies.
Stuff that has been debated to death, and is available in the FAQs,
might get less response.

Occasionally someone will be having an off-day, and fire off something
less than heplful, but this is up to you to filter, and generally the
signal to noise ratio is good.

David

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken

"Stimp" <ren@spumco.com> wrote in message
news:slrndat5kh.lba.ren@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie...
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 sharky <bill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Voss wrote:
>
> <SNIP!>
>
> If I'd known how anal this newsgroup is I wouldn't have posted
> originally.
> Get the snorkel out of yer ass... I'm off to the other scuba group where
> their pro-republican rantings are far more enjoyable :)
>
> sheesh!

Before you go - read your travel insurance!!

Some policies specify a depth limit, others state a limit "according to your
training and experience" so the 18m limit may well be a reasonable one to
employ, depending on the wording.

Ken