|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| At this moment we are looking for people who would like to join us on a historical wreck tour in Malaysia March, April and May 2007 We intend to have several groups out in the South China Seas. The expedition will run for several weeks back-to-back. There is an abundance of historical wrecks in this region. We have a list of known wrecks, and a list of so called "unknowns" If enough interest of the group we will also dedicate some dives to these unknown dive sites. We would like to gather more information on some of the wrecks to complete some of our research. If you are interested, please send us an email, and we will inform you in more detail. Send us some information on your dive preferences. Prerequisite for deep weeks: - Advanced Nitrox Qualified - DAN insurance ( or other ) Most wrecks are beyond normal Sport Diving depths 30+ However we will plan two weeks for wrecks shallower then 30 Meters Francis Leopold scubadates@gmail.com |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thus spake "plongeur" <scubadates@gmail.com> : >At this moment we are looking for people who would like to join us on a >historical wreck tour in Malaysia March, April and May 2007 >We intend to have several groups out in the South China Seas. The >expedition will run for several weeks back-to-back. > >There is an abundance of historical wrecks in this region. >We have a list of known wrecks, and a list of so called "unknowns" >If enough interest of the group we will also dedicate some dives to >these unknown dive sites. > >We would like to gather more information on some of the wrecks to >complete some of our research. > >If you are interested, please send us an email, and we will inform you >in more detail. Send us some information on your dive preferences. > >Prerequisite for deep weeks: - Advanced Nitrox Qualified >- DAN insurance ( or other ) > >Most wrecks are beyond normal Sport Diving depths 30+ >However we will plan two weeks for wrecks shallower then 30 Meters You dive below 30 meters on nitrox? > >Francis Leopold >scubadates@gmail.com -- dillon If you can't figure out how to unmunge my address, email me and I'll explain it. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dillon Pyron wrote >>Prerequisite for deep weeks: - Advanced Nitrox Qualified >>- DAN insurance ( or other ) > You dive below 30 meters on nitrox? Routinely. That's less than 100 feet. 32% is good to 111 at 1.4 PPO2 and 28 goes considerably deeper. I suspect, however, since he specified advanced nitrox that it's for decompression. Lee |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Dillon Pyron" <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote in message news:t1cse2ll0equth93ge76eno91ruje06bdq@4ax.com... > Thus spake "plongeur" <scubadates@gmail.com> : > >>At this moment we are looking for people who would like to join us on a >>historical wreck tour in Malaysia March, April and May 2007 >>We intend to have several groups out in the South China Seas. The >>expedition will run for several weeks back-to-back. >> >>There is an abundance of historical wrecks in this region. >>We have a list of known wrecks, and a list of so called "unknowns" >>If enough interest of the group we will also dedicate some dives to >>these unknown dive sites. >> >>We would like to gather more information on some of the wrecks to >>complete some of our research. >> >>If you are interested, please send us an email, and we will inform you >>in more detail. Send us some information on your dive preferences. >> >>Prerequisite for deep weeks: - Advanced Nitrox Qualified >>- DAN insurance ( or other ) >> >>Most wrecks are beyond normal Sport Diving depths 30+ >>However we will plan two weeks for wrecks shallower then 30 Meters > > You dive below 30 meters on nitrox? > All the time. Did it yesterday. LD. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thus spake "Lee Bell" <pleebell2@bellsouth.net> : >Dillon Pyron wrote > >>>Prerequisite for deep weeks: - Advanced Nitrox Qualified >>>- DAN insurance ( or other ) > >> You dive below 30 meters on nitrox? > >Routinely. That's less than 100 feet. 32% is good to 111 at 1.4 PPO2 and >28 goes considerably deeper. 30 is 99, so it's close enough. Yes, I knew that. It was my assumption (ass u me) that when he said "below 30 meters" he meant well below, like deeper than "recreational". > >I suspect, however, since he specified advanced nitrox that it's for >decompression. Sounds like a good bet. > >Lee > -- dillon If you can't figure out how to unmunge my address, email me and I'll explain it. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:42:26 -0500, Dillon Pyron <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote: > 30 is 99, so it's close enough. Actually 98.425' = 98' 5.1"... I would round that to 98, not 98, but what the 'ell, you're close enough... <grin> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> wrote in message news:n355f2p043qkc05ginf11uskn4ugqnbmij@4ax.com... > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:42:26 -0500, Dillon Pyron > <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote: > > 30 is 99, so it's close enough. > > Actually 98.425' = 98' 5.1"... I would round that to 98, not 98, Would you now? |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:50:21 GMT, "Chris Guynn" <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote: > Would you now? OK, finger fumble again... Change that to "98 not 99"... I've at least got an excuse for this one... I dropped my glasses on the marble floor in the bathroom and shattered one of the lenses... Yeah, it was glass lenses, not plastic -- some of us still prefer the optical clarity of glass over plastic... |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Thus spake Grumman-581 <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM-gmail.com> : >On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:42:26 -0500, Dillon Pyron ><dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> wrote: >> 30 is 99, so it's close enough. > >Actually 98.425' = 98' 5.1"... I would round that to 98, not 98, but >what the 'ell, you're close enough... <grin> Actually, those 6.9 inches could mean the difference between life and death. I know my computer is that accurate. -- dillon If you can't figure out how to unmunge my address, email me and I'll explain it. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Grumman-581 wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:50:21 GMT, "Chris Guynn" > <chris.guynn@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Would you now? > > > OK, finger fumble again... Change that to "98 not 99"... > > I've at least got an excuse for this one... I dropped my glasses on > the marble floor in the bathroom and shattered one of the lenses... > Yeah, it was glass lenses, not plastic -- some of us still prefer the > optical clarity of glass over plastic... Where do you find glass lenses? -- “TANSTAAFL” “All I can say is there had better be some cheese at the end of this maze……” __________________________________________________ __________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Historical wreck expedition Malaysia 2007 | plongeur | (French) | 0 | 04-12-2007 12:03 PM |
| Historical wreck tour Malaysia 2007 | plongeur | Malaysia | 0 | 03-27-2007 12:41 AM |
| 2007 Bimini Shark Encounter: 4-13 March 2007 | Piers Warren | Bahamas | 0 | 03-26-2007 08:34 PM |
| 2007 Bimini Shark Encounter: 4-13 March 2007 | Piers Warren | Bahamas | 10 | 11-27-2006 10:24 PM |
| Historical wreck expedition Malaysia 2007 | plongeur | (Dutch) | 12 | 08-24-2006 04:19 PM |