A Very Memorable Dive in Cozumel

"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8fb7380b.0403020724.1e1da760@posting.google.c om...
> ronleenospam@pcisys.net (Ron Lee) wrote in message
news:<4043f542.12245664@news.pcisys.net>...
> > Bob Ling, I post your real name because your actions denigrate the
> > butiful ocean fishes.
>
> That's the lamest excuse you've used, for the second time I recall.
> What about the hundreds of times you changed the SUBJECT of a thread
> to something derogatory about Bob Ling in the NEW SUBJECT you created?

Ahahahahaa, you mean like how this thread header was high jacked by you?

>
> Littered with those in the groups.google.com archives.

As you've done numerous time before, too many times to begin to calculate?

>
> Just another proof/confirmation of Ron Lee's idiocy.

Certainly proof of *someone's* maladjustment, but it's unlikely that it is
Ron's.

> > How is it slanderous to note the FACT that your
> > name-calling is childish? Finally hitting home Bob?
>
> Yup, Ron. It was your home run alright. The LAST STRAW. The
> ultimate PROOF of your IDIOCY!

Good then, if it's the last straw, we can finally hear the end of it.

>
> Finally hitting YOUR idiocy on the HEAD of the NAIL! The slanderous
> part was all your gratuitous remarks about my wife, my family, my
> friends, and my profession as a professor!
>
> Just look up the archives. You forgot THOSE didn't you?

You mean the part where he indicated that your wife was a lovely person and
that you were obviously intelligent to have been a well-known professor, yet
you still act like a crazy person?

>
> Ron Lee will be immortalized by this and earlier Profiles as the
> Supreme Hypocrite (calling OTHERS "idiot" when he kept whining about
> himself being called an idiot) and the cheap, sleasy excuses for
> trying to carve a name for himself in the annals of scuba forums.

LOL, you are accusing another of that?!!? What a nerve . . . have you no
mirrors in your house, Reef? (no pun intended but I like it so it stays)

>
(snip more ranting)

>
> Answer: Ron Lee is an IDIOT. I am already much older than you are.

That may be so, but you are not very grown up at all.

(snip)>
> You have failed MISERABLY in your self-granised excuse.

Yes, Fish, you should certainly recognize self-aggrandizement when you see
it. You are the most self-aggrandizing person I've ever seen post anywhere.
(Now you will prove that you are not by putting up a string of URL's for old
posts of yours, ahaahhahaha)

> -- Bob. (Reef Fish, Feesh, Feeesh, da Feesh, Feeeeeeesh, etc.) --
> THESE are the name by which I post and identified by ALL
> non-idiots in ALL scuba forums, because "Reef Fish" is
> the ONLY name I have used since 1992, for reasons of
> separating my professional name from my SCUBA and SCUBA
> related postings.

Yeah? And so that's how you tried to get us to look you up in Who's Who?

>
> P.S. If you want to find ANY post I ever made since 1992 and are
> retrievable via groups.google.com, all you have to do is to
> do an "advanced groups search" using ONLY "reef fish" as the
> Author. You will find NO OTHER Reef Fish.

Well, I'll take a chance here and respond for most of the group, we don't
want to find any of your old posts. Most of us don't even bother to open
the old ones you continually post nowadays.

(snip)

"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<g4%0c.28434$W74.3771@newsread1.news.atl.eart hlink.net>...
> Ron Lee wrote:
>
> > Bob Ling, I post your real name because your actions denigrate the
> > butiful ocean fishes. How is it slanderous to note the FACT that your
> > name-calling is childish? Finally hitting home Bob?
>
> That would be Robert F Ling. If you're going to post his name, you might as
> well get it right.

No, Lee. It would be Dr. Robert F. Ling, to you, and your hypocritical pal.


Just go to the "advanced groups search" section of
http://groups.google.com

and search rec.scuba with keywords "supreme hypocrite Lee Bell"

and you'll understand why Lee is stooping to his non-characteristic low
to add his cheap shots in defending, of all people, Ron Lee!


There are only THREE people in rec.scuba who had earned the label of
"Supreme hypocrite". TWO of them are Lee Bell AND Ron Lee, both for
their hypocritical stance on "name-calling", documented and easily
retrievable from the archives.


> A waste of time. Adding him to your blocked sender's list is a much easier
> answer.

Didn't seem to help YOU, did it, Lee Bell? You always find some SECOND
HAND snippets, such as those by Ron Lee, to put in your cheap shot. Why
do you think you have lost ALL credibility in the LIST where people knew
you longer than anyone in rec.scuba?


Lee, you'll do well to keep ME in your "blocked list" and have some
SELF CONTROL of refraining from following up on what IDIOTs say about
me, which had nothing to do with my posts (In this case, the posts
on "A Very Memorable Dive in Cozumel")

-- Bob.

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message news:<Wf21c.672568$ts4.160321@pd7tw3no>...

<snipping>

Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
somber expression>

Salty wrote:
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:<Wf21c.672568$ts4.160321@pd7tw3no>...
>
> <snipping>
>
> Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
> somber expression>

I'm not going to catch it. Bob's been in my blocked poster's list for a
long time. The only posts I see from him are those that somebody else
choses to quote. You may notice that I don't respond negatively to his
positive posts. When he started this thread, he was doing fine, or at least
that's how it looked from the responses.

"Salty" <babette7401@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e673a058.0403021526.2562055f@posting.google.c om...
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:<Wf21c.672568$ts4.160321@pd7tw3no>...
>
> <snipping>
>
> Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
> somber expression>

LOL LOL

"Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<TDc1c.31008$hm4.22606@newsread3.news.atl.ear thlink.net>...
> Salty wrote:
> > "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> > news:<Wf21c.672568$ts4.160321@pd7tw3no>...
> >
> > <snipping>
> >
> > Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
> > somber expression>

No need.

Salty, Lee Bell is doing a pretty good job revealing the Mr. Hyde
side of his Dr. Jackyl personna, as well as his true intellectual
character of burying his head in the sand while taking cheap
and blind shots on what he chose not to see:


> I'm not going to catch it. Bob's been in my blocked poster's list for a
> long time. The only posts I see from him are those that somebody else
> choses to quote. You may notice that I don't respond negatively to his
> positive posts. When he started this thread, he was doing fine, or at least
> that's how it looked from the responses.


For someone who can congratulate himself on his self-characterization
above, what more needs to be said?


As for chilly, she has proven herself in more times than I care to
count that she's nothing but an obnoxious, officious, under-educated,
and under-read gnat, incapable of carrying on any scuba or non-scuba
discussion of any substance. That's all the citation chilly needs.


-- Bob.

P.S. I got back home a short while ago from the trip of the Very
Memorable Dive in Cozumel. On a repeat of the same Las
Palmas dive, we had pics of the same seahorse, probably the
same sharptail eel, eagle ray, in addition to a pair of
juvenile drumfish that we sought but not seen on the dive
described.

The P.S. is for the scuba readers who may have followed the
original post and thread to this abysmal path.

Reef Fish <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> wrote:
>P.S. I got back home a short while ago from the trip of the Very
> Memorable Dive in Cozumel. On a repeat of the same Las

Ah, sorry to hear it. I liked the Bob who posted last week, and thought Ron
was definitely the instigator. Now it's just as it was before.

--
Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com (Reef Fish) pounded away at his
keyboard resulting in:
:
:P.S. I got back home a short while ago from the trip of the Very
: Memorable Dive in Cozumel. On a repeat of the same Las
: Palmas dive, we had pics of the same seahorse, probably the
: same sharptail eel, eagle ray, in addition to a pair of
: juvenile drumfish that we sought but not seen on the dive
: described.

This seahorse? http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/underwater/Seahorse.htm

It was photographed at Las Palmas.

Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

"chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
news:2Dd1c.671692$X%5.542935@pd7tw2no...
>
> "Salty" <babette7401@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e673a058.0403021526.2562055f@posting.google.c om...
> > "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> news:<Wf21c.672568$ts4.160321@pd7tw3no>...
> >
> > <snipping>
> >
> > Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
> > somber expression>
>
> LOL LOL
>
---------------------------------------------
Chilly,

You guys are doing great! Keep 'em busy. There's a very nice thread that's
started....very accurately describing Tobago. It would be ashame to pollute
it with Bob's distorted perception.

Forest

"Forest Aten" <forestaten@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:fkA1c.34296$ko6.335676@attbi_s02...
>
> "chilly" <slarson@shaw.canada> wrote in message
> > > Between you and Lee Bell... you guys are gonna catch hell now. <very
> > > somber expression>
> >
> > LOL LOL
> >
> ---------------------------------------------
> Chilly,
>
> You guys are doing great! Keep 'em busy. There's a very nice thread that's
> started....very accurately describing Tobago. It would be ashame to
pollute
> it with Bob's distorted perception.

Thanks, I'll check it out.

However, as far as keeping Bob busy, he's pretty good at doing that all by
himself. Not to mention, I seem to be involved in another ongoing project
of similar nature. I usually only poke him when I'm bored.