pacific mexico

"W.E. O'Neil" <we_o@anesthesiaop.net> wrote in message
news:I%TYe.3507$c54.974@news.uswest.net...

> I shoot digital for most things, but since I shoot RAW, depending on the
> card and my downloading laziness between dives I can, and sometimes do,
> hit capacilty. But that isn't why I dislike taking what I know will be a
> bad shot.

My camera is pre-RAW

>> Any shot is better than no shot at all, especially if you can make out
>> what's being shot.
>
> I would disagree with you, but I am not the disagreeable type.

That's too bad, for I am very disagreeable and will disagree with everything
you say just to spite you.

> Absolutely. For those who enjoy fish ID it's a useful tool. My
> perspective, right or wrong, is I only care about ID'ing the animals I
> have imaged well.

I disagree. All the animals I want to ID have been imaged very well upon my
retinae. It's not my fault or the fish's fault that my camera can't keep
up.