Heading to Bonaire

Rod wrote:

> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:55:55 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>bullshark wrote:
>>
>>>Dave C wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Bullshark, I'm not sure if you mean Bonaire, as it has dozens of dive
>>>>sites on the west side, most of which have a reef sloping steeply from
>>>>about 30' to 120'.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah I do mean Bonaire, and you have to look pretty hard to find 100'.
>>>
>>
>>As I recall, the "Hilma Hooker" is at 100fsw +/- and it is a fairly easy
>>shore dive. When I dove it, we had a significant current to contend
>>with but by the time we finished the dive, returned to shore and packed
>>up, the current had died down.
>>
>
> It is a waste of time, the worst dive on the island.

The worst dive of the island is better than a good day at work.

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:08:45 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
wrote:

>
>
>Rod wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:55:55 -0400, nitespark <nitespark@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>bullshark wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dave C wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Bullshark, I'm not sure if you mean Bonaire, as it has dozens of dive
>>>>>sites on the west side, most of which have a reef sloping steeply from
>>>>>about 30' to 120'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yeah I do mean Bonaire, and you have to look pretty hard to find 100'.
>>>>
>>>
>>>As I recall, the "Hilma Hooker" is at 100fsw +/- and it is a fairly easy
>>>shore dive. When I dove it, we had a significant current to contend
>>>with but by the time we finished the dive, returned to shore and packed
>>>up, the current had died down.
>>>
>>
>> It is a waste of time, the worst dive on the island.
>
>The worst dive of the island is better than a good day at work.
>
I agree with that