|
| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the scubish.com - Scuba Diving Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| "Clive Dive" wrote ... > "OK then, consider this > > A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, > all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the > van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg > will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It > maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. > Discuss...10 pts Wow, and I thought those of us over in rec.scuba had strange discussions... <grin> Actually, our topics tend to be only about guns, politics, and sex since we've probably discussed every diving topic to death by now... |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:23 GMT, "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote: > >"Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@myga te.mailgate.org... >> "OK then, consider this >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> Discuss...10 pts >> > >Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result of >the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get hit by >the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the floor >which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead weight. Nope. As others have said, the force required to keep them in the air (they're not going to be able to glide in an enclosed space) must be equal to the weight of the birds. However, if they ALL take off simultaneously, the downforce must be > than the weight (or no upwards acceleration) therefore the van will bottom out and trash the suspension. Would take a lot of budgies though. ------------------------------------- York BSAC Web Page: http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:23 GMT, "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote: > >"Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@myga te.mailgate.org... >> "OK then, consider this >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> Discuss...10 pts >> > >Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result of >the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get hit by >the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the floor >which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead weight. Nope. As others have said, the force required to keep them in the air (they're not going to be able to glide in an enclosed space) must be equal to the weight of the birds. However, if they ALL take off simultaneously, the downforce must be > than the weight (or no upwards acceleration) therefore the van will bottom out and trash the suspension. Would take a lot of budgies though. ------------------------------------- York BSAC Web Page: http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:23 GMT, "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote: > >"Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@myga te.mailgate.org... >> "OK then, consider this >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> Discuss...10 pts >> > >Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result of >the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get hit by >the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the floor >which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead weight. Nope. As others have said, the force required to keep them in the air (they're not going to be able to glide in an enclosed space) must be equal to the weight of the birds. However, if they ALL take off simultaneously, the downforce must be > than the weight (or no upwards acceleration) therefore the van will bottom out and trash the suspension. Would take a lot of budgies though. ------------------------------------- York BSAC Web Page: http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:23 GMT, "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote: > >"Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@myga te.mailgate.org... >> "OK then, consider this >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> Discuss...10 pts >> > >Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result of >the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get hit by >the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the floor >which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead weight. Nope. As others have said, the force required to keep them in the air (they're not going to be able to glide in an enclosed space) must be equal to the weight of the birds. However, if they ALL take off simultaneously, the downforce must be > than the weight (or no upwards acceleration) therefore the van will bottom out and trash the suspension. Would take a lot of budgies though. ------------------------------------- York BSAC Web Page: http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:32:23 GMT, "Keith Manning" <Nospam@tesco.net> wrote: > >"Clive Dive" <penos1@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:4aefe30c9f7eda94b6808983be1d8a0a.115311@myga te.mailgate.org... >> "OK then, consider this >> >> A delivery van is ferrying a consignment of live free flying budgies, >> all sitting on perches in the sealed but aeratd rear of the van. Is the >> van lighter if all the budgies are in flight? if so then surely the mpg >> will increase? as the van is now lighter, or is it? or do we care? It >> maybe a thought for all those involved in the pigeon transport world. >> Discuss...10 pts >> > >Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly the >same moment making the van over 100kgs lighter. It speeds up as a result of >the sudden unloading and they all get killed stone dead when they get hit by >the accelerating towards them back door. Thus dropping back to the floor >which causes the van to slow down again due to the added dead weight. Nope. As others have said, the force required to keep them in the air (they're not going to be able to glide in an enclosed space) must be equal to the weight of the birds. However, if they ALL take off simultaneously, the downforce must be > than the weight (or no upwards acceleration) therefore the van will bottom out and trash the suspension. Would take a lot of budgies though. ------------------------------------- York BSAC Web Page: http://website.lineone.net/~york_bsac |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| Keith Manning wrote: > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly > the same moment... As a mass is accelerating upwards a corresponding force presses downwards. The rear suspension is getting old, like the backfiring engine, and collapses under the strain. The van skids off the road and breaks open releasing the budgies. The police are unable to prosecute for being overloaded as the van is now lighter and magistrates want a slip from the weighbridge before handing out fines and points. nigelH |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| Keith Manning wrote: > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly > the same moment... As a mass is accelerating upwards a corresponding force presses downwards. The rear suspension is getting old, like the backfiring engine, and collapses under the strain. The van skids off the road and breaks open releasing the budgies. The police are unable to prosecute for being overloaded as the van is now lighter and magistrates want a slip from the weighbridge before handing out fines and points. nigelH |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| Keith Manning wrote: > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly > the same moment... As a mass is accelerating upwards a corresponding force presses downwards. The rear suspension is getting old, like the backfiring engine, and collapses under the strain. The van skids off the road and breaks open releasing the budgies. The police are unable to prosecute for being overloaded as the van is now lighter and magistrates want a slip from the weighbridge before handing out fines and points. nigelH |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| Keith Manning wrote: > Here's a thought. The van backfires and they all take off at exactly > the same moment... As a mass is accelerating upwards a corresponding force presses downwards. The rear suspension is getting old, like the backfiring engine, and collapses under the strain. The van skids off the road and breaks open releasing the budgies. The police are unable to prosecute for being overloaded as the van is now lighter and magistrates want a slip from the weighbridge before handing out fines and points. nigelH |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 11:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 11:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 11:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 11:39 AM |
| key stage two question on tv last night | david | United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland | 0 | 01-27-2005 11:39 AM |